MAGA farm owners say they can’t find American workers anymore

[Trumpet]

While we're on the subject, why does your party want to kill as many children as possible, both in the womb and out? I really am curious.

Why do you keep posting ridiculous tripe?????????????

 

[Trumpet]

You are pushing a system that, based on wealth redistribution, allows the government to destroy the economy and the lives of it citizens


... knowing that those in power will not suffer.


If you get your way, it will actually make sense for more and more people simply remain at home, seated on their sofas and stuffing their faces with Pringles and Dr. Pepper than make any attempt to find a job, until everyone except governmet workers are equally broke and miserable.

Do you understand that is what you are pushing and will you own that is exactly what you want?

This is what the Scum-lian have been doing for years.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I absolutely agree that hypergamy, as an evolutionary trait will cause problems as women gain ever more of the income share. We have many evolutionary traits that very subtly but also powerfully impact our decision making in ways many never realize (such as desire to keep eating when full and put on fat due to historical cycles of feast and famine) and hypergamy is a key one. The fact that historically women who got pregnant could be devastated if they had no man with an income and home drove that to being a top tier evolutionary need. And just as with 'over eating', hypergamy is very tough to over come if a female is not self aware of it and actively engages to change it.

But the key to that is not for women to stop working and become more subservient and to instead evolve to understand their evolutionary instinct to seek a man with greater shelter and income is not necessary increasingly in a world where women can be the primary income earner.

As with my stated example above, with female making $200K+/yr marrying WAY down, via income, and having a seemingly successful family and marriage we see more such examples like that trend is growing. As more females who also make large incomes see that, it gives them more reason to consider it whereas prior the instinct may have been to feel like they failing if they married a lesser earning male.

So the key to success is NOT forcing women to not be able to earn large incomes and is instead for the evolution process to continue, as it has been, to a point where hypergamy and over eating and other such evolutionary influences subside. And they WILL.

no, they won't. the social media world of women between the ages of 18 and 45 is full of women telling each other that they deserve a 6 foot tall man with 6 pack abs and makes 6 figures and that's what they consider 'bare minimum'........a handful of women are telling them that they need to live in reality and not have such high standards, only to get called 'pick me' girls........................

most women today do not have the foresight needed to make that adjustment and many economists know it, which is why they are predicting boxed wine and cat food stocks will become valuable, that by 2030, half of all women over the age of 30 will be single and childless.

most women live in a world of delusional entitlement and there are no signs of them changing that any time soon.

 

[AProudLefty]

Yes, it most certainly is. Let me know when you want to bring it on.


English comprehension isn't your strong suit either.


Epic fail. Obviously you won't be making any intelligent contributions anytime soon.

You committed a fallacy.

 

[AProudLefty]

While we're on the subject, why does your party want to kill as many children as possible, both in the womb and out? I really am curious.

I really am curious about your delusion. What caused it?

 

[Trumpet]

I really am curious about your delusion. What caused it?

Drugs

 

[QP!]

So you would rather see able bodied people who can work just live off of benefits instead? From cradle to grave? They need to work some too and pay into the system like the rest of us do.

Unemployment has been at record lows and that trend has been continuing for decades, so i am less concerned with the small percent who may be working then system than i am about handing corporations ever more taxpayer subsidies.

Why are you ok with increasing taxpayer subsidies with giant corporations who tend to be amongst the most profitable?

Don't duck that question, as you keep trying to do. Answer it.

 

[LichGold]

If you call around to these farms asking if they need work they'll report your number as spam calls.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

why do women want to be men?

Not sure where you got that odd notion. We don't want to be men. Unless, of course, they are trans.)

Wanting equal opportunity and equal pay does not mean we want to be men. Black people wanting the same are not wishing to become White.

 

[LichGold]

Not sure where you got that odd notion. We don't want to be men. Unless, of course, they are trans.)

Wanting equal opportunity and equal pay does not mean we want to be men. Black people wanting the same are not wishing to become White.

Why do women want to be trans men?

 

[QP!]

no, they won't. the social media world of women between the ages of 18 and 45 is full of women telling each other that they deserve a 6 foot tall man with 6 pack abs and makes 6 figures and that's what they consider 'bare minimum'........a handful of women are telling them that they need to live in reality and not have such high standards, only to get called 'pick me' girls........................

most women today do not have the foresight needed to make that adjustment and many economists know it, which is why they are predicting boxed wine and cat food stocks will become valuable, that by 2030, half of all women over the age of 30 will be single and childless.

most women live in a world of delusional entitlement and there are no signs of them changing that any time soon.

Your brain is rotted from you living on social media and in magat spheres.

Women have always aspired to a 'perfect man' ideal in the same way men have 'perfect women' ideals.

How many movies or tv shows, heck just think of sitcoms alone, do they present average looking men, married to wayyyyy hotter wives or GF's and for how many generations have you seen that? That is because men want to believe that no matter how ugly, how short and how broke they are, they deserve and will get a drop dead gorgeous wife.

In reality, people pair up much closer to the peer rate.

You are the worst person possible to diagnose womens beliefs and problems when you are basically an incel trapped in magat media.

 

[LichGold]

Your brain is rotted from you living on social media and in magat spheres.

Women have always aspired to a 'perfect man' ideal in the same way men have 'perfect women' ideals.

How many movies or tv shows, heck just think of sitcoms alone, do they present average looking men, married to wayyyyy hotter wives or GF's and for how many generations have you seen that? That is because men want to believe that no matter how ugly, how short and how broke they deserve and will get a drop dead gorgeous wife.

In reality, people pair up much closer to the peer rate.

You are the worst person possible to diagnose womens beliefs and problems when you are basically an incel trapped in magat media.

Is it obvious these FAGGOts are salty?

 

[QP!]

Not sure where you got that odd notion. We don't want to be men. Unless, of course, they are trans.)

Wanting equal opportunity and equal pay does not mean we want to be men. Black people wanting the same are not wishing to become White.

I mean 'why did black people want to be white people by asking for civil rights and not to be slaves, etc'. /DumberThanEveryone


Back before there were child support rights and spousal support rights, which is the time magats long for again, a mother could could be married, have several children with the husband, and he could leave her to marry his ongoing affair, and because she had no source of income and no way to provide a home, he would also get the kids, if he wanted them.

Those are the good ole days magats pine for and they will speak to how low divorce rates were, which, in large point is that it was almost impossible for women to leave even if he was cheating on her and beating her up daily.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Not sure where you got that odd notion. We don't want to be men. Unless, of course, they are trans.)

Wanting equal opportunity and equal pay does not mean we want to be men. Black people wanting the same are not wishing to become White.

bits of deflection, but here's where women show that they want to be men. the whole 'boss bitch' mentality. assertiveness, dominance, aggression, and confrontation......these are all masculine traits that men use in the workforce. These are all evolutionary traits associated with masculinity.

what I haven't been able to grasp yet is why women want to break away from gender roles that has worked for thousands of years?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Your brain is rotted from you living on social media and in magat spheres.

Women have always aspired to a 'perfect man' ideal in the same way men have 'perfect women' ideals.

How many movies or tv shows, heck just think of sitcoms alone, do they present average looking men, married to wayyyyy hotter wives or GF's and for how many generations have you seen that? That is because men want to believe that no matter how ugly, how short and how broke they are, they deserve and will get a drop dead gorgeous wife.

In reality, people pair up much closer to the peer rate.

You are the worst person possible to diagnose womens beliefs and problems when you are basically an incel trapped in magat media.

are you incapable of making an argument without ad homs?

your reality is before the age of social media. These days, you have top tier men sliding into the DMs of girls of all calibers.............then that access rots a womans brain because she lets the rapper or athlete have sex with her. Now that woman who is a 5 thinks she can get a 9 or a 10 to commit to her, not realizing that she just got used for sex. Then, if she realizes that, blames all men for her bad decision.

I'll state this again, i'm not wrestling in the mud with you pigs. you're wrong and you prove it with constant ad homs instead of logical debate

 

[LurchAddams]

Well, here's a steaming pile of cow manure. There are so many, many rebuttals to this nonsense but why bother.

This is a common theme I'm seeing now from the trumptards. @anonymoose did the same thing earlier today. trumptards are NOT responsible for the evil they do - "the left just makes them do it".

Isn't it great that trumptards crimes are all my fault? LOL. It's scapegoating. The Nazis did it with the Jews - and they're still doing it - only this time they have a safe haven in today's Republican tent.

 

[QP!]

are you incapable of making an argument without ad homs?

your reality is before the age of social media. These days, you have top tier men sliding into the DMs of girls of all calibers.............then that access rots a womans brain because she lets the rapper or athlete have sex with her. Now that woman who is a 5 thinks she can get a 9 or a 10 to commit to her, not realizing that she just got used for sex. Then, if she realizes that, blames all men for her bad decision.

I'll state this again, i'm not wrestling in the mud with you pigs. you're wrong and you prove it with constant ad homs instead of logical debate

Sorry but i just enjoy seeing what snowflakes magats and watching you cry at names with the user name you chose as an insult to all the others you "make an argument" with.

So too bad for you that you are so butthurt and cannot take it but you still want to try and dish it out, despite being so incredible bad at it, as the "poorly educated" are.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Sorry but i just enjoy seeing what snowflakes magats and watching you cry at names with the user name you chose as an insult to all the others you "make an argument" with.

So too bad for you that you are so butthurt and cannot take it but you still want to try and dish it out, despite being so incredible bad at it, as the "poorly educated" are.

cool story, bro. it's too bad you didn't actually do any of that.

 

[LichGold]

bits of deflection, but here's where women show that they want to be men. the whole 'boss bitch' mentality. assertiveness, dominance, aggression, and confrontation......these are all masculine traits that men use in the workforce. These are all evolutionary traits associated with masculinity.

what I haven't been able to grasp yet is why women want to break away from gender roles that has worked for thousands of years?

Tens of ten thousands of years. And it seems to have something to do with rope applications. A major turning point in human evolution cane with the invention of rope and using it to domesticate females.

Consider the value of a Husbandry Rights Restoration Act. Enabling feminism is just encouraging feminism. No where else in the world are they more radical and vile than where they have the most freedom. And it appears to be more about loneliness and resentment than anything else.

They're literally the same people inviting all the South American rapists and sanctimonious Islamic misogynists.

What's that say? It sez all women have "rape fantasies" and none of them have "good little eunuch faggot fantasies."

 

[EdwinA]

Oh look - more fake news from the 12b Maggot,

Must be a day ending in "Y"

We can note the usual cognitive dissonance here. First, the parrots snivel about Trump cutting welfare and food stamps and how evul it all is, then in another thread they're all about how it's just poor whites and evul Republicans on welfare n stuff and how great it is they're going to starve hahaha. They can't seem to make up their minds on such things. OF course it's just more proof they're nothing but parrots, of course.

So which is it, mostly women and children on welfare? That would mean the Democrats are hoping to starve them, which of course fits in with their own misogyny and hatred of children. And we know that that is indeed the case, as they promote mass murders of babies and sexually mutilating the survivors.

And, don't forget their latest 'appeal to science n stuff', after-birth abortion.

After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of Medical Ethics

Failing to bring a new person into existence cannot be compared with the wrong caused by procuring the death of an existing person. The reason is that, unlike the case of death of an existing person, failing to bring a new person into existence does not prevent anyone from accomplishing any of her future aims. However, this consideration entails a much stronger idea than the one according to which severely handicapped children should be euthanised. If the death of a newborn is not wrongful to her on the grounds that she cannot have formed any aim that she is prevented from accomplishing, then it should also be permissible to practise an after-birth abortion on a healthy newborn too, given that she has not formed any aim yet.


There are two reasons which, taken together, justify this claim:

1. The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus, that is, neither can be considered a ‘person’ in a morally relevant sense.
2. It is not possible to damage a newborn by preventing her from developing the potentiality to become a person in the morally relevant sense.

Hey, it's Science N Stuff !!! Find your two year old to be inconvenient? Is it keeping you from buying that new TV? Slaughter it! All good Democrats love science n stuff.