Lynch meeting with Bill Clinton creates firestorm for email case

Rune said:
You must be kidding.
Ms. Lynch rteained her security staff and DID NOT meet in private with Mr. Clinton.
Click to expand...
Though she insisted the 30-minute conversation was a purely social encounter, Ms. Lynch said, “I certainly wouldn’t do it again.”
Click to expand...

The attorney general joked that she should have acted more swiftly to keep him from boarding. Asked by a journalist to name one thing she wished her predecessor, Eric H. Holder Jr., had told her about her job, she replied, “Where the lock on the plane door was.”
Click to expand...
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/02/us/politics/loretta-lynch-hillary-clinton-email-server.html?_r=1
 
TheDonald said:
The meeting was held and filmed on purpose, Lynch can still choose not to indict unless she stands aside, which she has not done. If there were no cameras who filmed it? and how did the person with the camera know what and when to film? This airport scene was quite purposeful for the Clintons
Click to expand...
no idea/ cell phones maybe? The meeting was still a private meeting.
PS could you make you sig pic a little smaller? thanks
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Well, compared to a Hillary indictment and calling Obama as a witness it wasn't so bad.
Click to expand...

We do not know why the meeting at the airport happened, nor do we know that it was caught on camera secretly, the entire thing may have been planned to be filmed and outed. Yet people believe what they choose, which is that Bill and Lynch were caught, I say not so fast to the conclusion.
 
anatta said:
I log in with a fresh batch of stupidity to deal with. ..Rune never fails..

Lynch is top in DoJ,and as such has ultimate say in any prosecutions - do all prosecutorial decisions go thru her desk? no
would this one have done so? - yes, there isn't a more determinative case out there .
To clarify: it would have been her decision to accept/reject/modify the FBI's recommendations. yes.

I'm not looking for documentation to satisfy you -i'm on break between taking phone calls for work-
and you should learn to use The Google yourself for once.

Hint: does any prosecutor (or member of a prosecutor's office) meet on an unofficial basis with anyone -
or related to anyone that Office or investigators associated with?

FBI is part of DoJ
Click to expand...

Laughing my fucking ass off @ anaata.
Again the USAG is not a prosecutor.
Only Asistants prosecute.

Meeting in private? That could be viewed as an impropriaty. Such was NOT the case.

Your refusal to back up your claim is hillarious in that you find it needed to post copy about the most basic obvious
concepts.

I did indded google you flippant piece of shit.

There are zero restrictions, ethical, legal moral or otherwise as to who the USAG general may meet....further the guidline of ethics for prosecutors issued by the American Bar makes zero mention either.

Face it anaata you are a classical muck raker, you sling mud at the wall to see what will stick in the manner of a disconsolate monkey flinging his feces at onlookers.

You have an irrational hatred of everything Clinton and if you could prove me wrong you already would have.

What tiny bits of credibilty you may have once had have now been shredded finely and cast to the four winds....you have become a laughing stock, a charicature at best.

Thank you so much YOU FUCKING LOSER.
 
Rune said:
Laughing my fucking ass off @ anaata.
Again the USAG is not a prosecutor.
Only Asistants prosecute.

Meeting in private? That could be viewed as an impropriaty. Such was NOT the case.

Your refusal to back up your claim is hillarious in that you find it needed to post copy about the most basic obvious
concepts.

I did indded google you flippant piece if shit.

There are zero restrictions, ethical, legal moral or otherwise as to who the USAG general may meet....further the guidline of ethics for prosecutors issued by the American Bar makes zero mention either.

Face it anaata you are a classical muck raker, you sling mud at the wall to see what wull stick in the manner of a disconsolute monkey flinging his feces at onlookers.

You have an irrational hatred of everything Clinton and if you could prove me wrong you already would have.

What tiny shreds of credibilty you may have once had have now been shredded finely and cast to the four winds....you have become a la ughing stock, a charicature at best.

Thank you so much YOU FUCKING LOSER.
Click to expand...

Just so you know, your word usage puts you at the level of a flea circus trainer.
 
Rune said:
.
1. AG Lynch is not "The prosecutor" since there is no Federal case against H.R. Clinton.
No Federal case exists unless criminal charges are filedin a Federal Court.

2. The US AG is an advisor of legal matters to other members of the Executive Branch. Assistant USAGs do prosecutions.
Click to expand...
it is not surprising that you lack understanding of this matter.....as the AG she has the final say on whether or not a person will be prosecuted by the federal government.....everyone, Democrat or Republican is fully aware of what you deny......that the AG should not be meeting with former POTUS if the AG will soon be called upon to decide if the wife of the former POTUS should be prosecuted by the federal government.....and she is the one with the final say so on if and who among the assistant USAG will handle the case against said wife of the former POTUS when it is filed.....
 
Rune said:
There are zero restrictions, ethical, legal moral or otherwise as to who the USAG general may meet....
Click to expand...

seriously?......then why is it that even she knew she had to hold a press conference about it.....if there were no concerns why bring it up?.....
 
Rune said:
Laughing my fucking ass off @ anaata.
Again the USAG is not a prosecutor.
Only Asistants prosecute.

Meeting in private? That could be viewed as an impropriaty. Such was NOT the case.

Your refusal to back up your claim is hillarious in that you find it needed to post copy about the most basic obvious
concepts.

I did indded google you flippant piece if shit.

There are zero restrictions, ethical, legal moral or otherwise as to who the USAG general may meet....further the guidline of ethics for prosecutors issued by the American Bar makes zero mention either.

Face it anaata you are a classical muck raker, you sling mud at the wall to see what wull stick in the manner of a disconsolute monkey flinging his feces at onlookers.

You have an irrational hatred of everything Clinton and if you could prove me wrong you already would have.

What tiny shreds of credibilty you may have once had have now been shredded finely and cast to the four winds....you have become a la ughing stock, a charicature at best.

Thank you so much YOU FUCKING LOSER.
Click to expand...
I'm not in the mood to google up obvious stuff.
the entire world calls it an impropriety yet some how the Great Rune doesn't think it to be so..

If you can't see this was a private meeting (as opposed to a public one) mores the pity..
having staff at a private meeting does not make it public -or relieve Lynch from ethical responsibilities.

She's recused herself from any further involvement in the decision making, once the FBI makes any recommendation
for prosecution ( or does not recommend). not a formal recusal, but close enough

There are zero restrictions, ethical, legal moral or otherwise as to who the USAG general may meet....further the guidline of ethics for prosecutors issued by the American Bar makes zero mention either.
Click to expand...
^ under what circumstances??? while her enforcement dept (FBI) is investigating a spouse??
It's amazing how you screw up every concept you attempt to discuss.

USAG is head of DoJ - as such she is director of the dept. whether she does the actual prosecution,
or makes the recommendation is hair splitting without value .her voice is determinative of action
++

US Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton meet privately in Phoenix before Benghazi report
http://www.abc15.com/news/region-ph...-lynch-bill-clinton-meet-privately-in-phoenix
 
anatta said:
I'm not in the mood to google up obvious stuff.
the entire world calls it an impropriety yet some how the Great Rune doesn't think it to be so..

If you can't see this was a private meeting (as opposed to a public one) mores the pity..
having staff at a private meeting does not make it public -or relieve Lynch from ethical responsibilities.

She's recused herself from any further involvement in the decision making, once the FBI makes any recommendation
for prosecution ( or does not recommend). not a formal recusal, but close enough

^ under what circumstances??? while her enforcement dept (FBI) is investigating a spouse??
It's amazing how you screw up every concept you attempt to discuss.

USAG is head of DoJ - as such she is director of the dept. whether she does the actual prosecution,
or makes the recommendation is hair splitting without value .her voice is determinative of action
++

US Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton meet privately in Phoenix before Benghazi report
http://www.abc15.com/news/region-ph...-lynch-bill-clinton-meet-privately-in-phoenix
Click to expand...

Again, for the idiots, there is NO CASE until charges are filed in a Federal court.

Without a case there is no impropriaty. Fucking idiots.

Furthermore she most certainly DID NOT recuse herself, like most of your lies, you are making that up from whole cloth to suit your ends.
You Sir, are a liar of the first order and without shame.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top