Lynch meeting with Bill Clinton creates firestorm for email case

anatta said:
I'm not in the mood to google up obvious stuff.
the entire world calls it an impropriety yet some how the Great Rune doesn't think it to be so..

If you can't see this was a private meeting (as opposed to a public one) mores the pity..
having staff at a private meeting does not make it public -or relieve Lynch from ethical responsibilities.

She's recused herself from any further involvement in the decision making, once the FBI makes any recommendation
for prosecution ( or does not recommend). not a formal recusal, but close enough

^ under what circumstances??? while her enforcement dept (FBI) is investigating a spouse??
It's amazing how you screw up every concept you attempt to discuss.

USAG is head of DoJ - as such she is director of the dept. whether she does the actual prosecution,
or makes the recommendation is hair splitting without value .her voice is determinative of action
++

US Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton meet privately in Phoenix before Benghazi report
http://www.abc15.com/news/region-ph...-lynch-bill-clinton-meet-privately-in-phoenix
Click to expand...

Now you are not in the mood, yesterday you did it for other's clarity.
You are a piss poor liar.
 
Rune said:
Again, for the idiots, there is NO CASE until charges are filed in a Federal court.

Without a case there is no impropriaty. Fucking idiots.
Click to expand...

Dude, there doesn't have to be a case. Both Clintons are under an *investigation* that could result in indictment.

Even democrats see the impropriety.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Dude, there doesn't have to be a case. Both Clintons are under an *investigation* that could result in indictment.

Even democrats see the impropriety.
Click to expand...

I am sorry.... You said there was a case.
Were you lying then or now?

Federal law is quite clear and for a reason;
There is no Federal Case unless charges are filed in a Federal Court.

By all means prove your claim about Dems...you can't.
 
Rune said:
Again, for the idiots, there is NO CASE until charges are filed in a Federal court.

Without a case there is no impropriaty. Fucking idiots.

Furthermore she most certainly DID NOT recuse herself, like most of your lies, you are making that up from whole cloth to suit your ends.
You Sir, are a liar of the first order and without shame.
Click to expand...

Funny the banned Daeshtard claimed she recused herself but you didn't correct her
 
For whatever reason they met on that plane, some good may have come of it. Lynch was basically forced to concede that she would comply with the recommendations of the FBI, and a motorcade of black govt. Suburbans picked her up from her DC residence this morning. Personally, I think Bill was asking her for hillary's head on a stake to get back at her for smearing his "good" name.
 
anatta said:
idiot. a private meeting between 2 parties can and does include staff.
Click to expand...

The report says that Clinton stepped onto the plane without his secret service and that Lynches security detail was not there as well, thus the meeting was private, assuming that the pilot was not there as well.
 
Rune said:
Again, for the idiots, there is NO CASE until charges are filed in a Federal court.

Without a case there is no impropriaty. Fucking idiots.

Furthermore she most certainly DID NOT recuse herself, like most of your lies, you are making that up from whole cloth to suit your ends.
You Sir, are a liar of the first order and without shame.
Click to expand...
she did not recuse, she did remove herself from the decision making process..do you see how both is possible?
The "case" would be her determination to prosecute base on the FBI's recommendations It is an investigation as of now.
I did not use the word "case" here- why do you sow red herrings for rebuttals?

Thanks for the comic relief from my job :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top