Monad Portal
Was it me?
you're a nitpicking imbecile.
“lose-lose” scenario
- Thread starter dukkha
- Start date
you're a nitpicking imbecile.
Monad Portal
Was it me?
war machine. war machine. war machine.
Monad Portal
Was it me?
no the point doesnt remain the same.
john brennan is weak for using the royal we. you fucking idiot.
Maybe, maybe not.
Why do you support Putin overrunning Ukraine? You're appeasing Putin just like Chamberlain appeased Hitler as pointed out earlier.
Why the inconsistency? Is it because you hate America just like I said?
Jesus fucking Christ you're a moron. No wonder you're being set up as a patsy.
First, you don't know how to properly quote something on JPP so people can tell the difference between a quote and a statement.
Second, you didn't cite the reference and I can't find Brennan saying it even though it sounds good to me. Using Intelligence over "facts" is part of the job. He's the head of the CIA. Do I really need to tell you what the fucking "I" stands for, Fredo?
As the leader of a group, it would be proper to use the Royal "we" when a person is speaking on behalf of the group. If the quote is true, I'm guessing he was speaking for the CIA.
not really. NATO would kick Russia's ass with or without being in Uk.
If you know that Russia certainly knows it and the second half of your thread's argument goes down the drain.
Change the subject much?
the thread OP has 3 concepts.
1. sanctions dont work -they are delayed and can cause escalated moves by Putin
2.they cause economic misery for those putting on sanctions as well
( Russia withholding fertilizer -wait till the spring growing season has shortages and price hikes)
3.and your contention- and in the OP- it keeps Russia from doing it again
(my contention that was never going to happen and certainly not after Uk)
Just following your lead into a hole to see how deep it goes.
Then comment on what I said.
Monad Portal
Was it me?
moon
Satire for Sanity
We'd never know because it would go nuclear immediately. Can you think of anything more stupid than surrounding Russia with a string of weak countries that you've promised to sacrifice 334 million Americans for ? How does that sit with a government's first duty of the well-being of its people ?
BartenderElite
Verified User
The purpose of the sanctions is pretty obvious.
It's not a "lose lose." What's the alternative? Is this a "we should stay out of this" piece of propaganda thread?
It's not a "lose lose." What's the alternative? Is this a "we should stay out of this" piece of propaganda thread?
I did. The fact you don't like the answer is your own fucking problem.
How did Russia make out in Afghanistan you obtuse bastard?
You don't want to answer because it refutes your bullshit.
Of course it is lose/lose Shithead.
All war is. Only the Banksters and the MIC gain.
Why are you posting here?
Fucking prog moron.
Quagmire. US Stingers didn't help. Now who is changing the subject, douchebag?
That Putin's Russia would never "do it again" seems a weak contention unless the price paid for doing it a first time is especially heavy.
Agreed that Putin is the problem. However, if the Russians don't stop him then Russia becomes the problem.
Might well be a lesser problem, as prior Russian successive leaders sometimes proved to be. In this case, Putin's ego is uniquely engaged in what has become a nasty experience for Russia however it ends.