Long War Fail, part three; Civilian deaths leap under Trump

I was watching a report from inside Raqqa, it is a very bloody street by street war, which inevitably results in high casualties. Daesh are like cornered rats with nothing to lose, should everybody just walk away instead? Again I repeat, every casualty should be chalked up to Obama, he is the reason that Raqqa, Mosul and Nineveh were taken in the first place.

Classic, trumpf orders the deaths of innocent ppl & you blame someone else, anyone else...

The blood on his little hands is his, no one else-the buck stops there...
 
Classic, trumpf orders the deaths of innocent ppl & you blame someone else, anyone else...

The blood on his little hands is his, no one else-the buck stops there...
Are you denying that Obama dropped the ball and sat back watching Daesh take over all those cities? I suppose you could try, but any dispassionate observer would disagree with you. I know than you detest Trump and it truly clouds your thinking, but those deaths are due to Obama. There is no other logical way to look at it.
 
I accept your concession.

(laughing)

And you're one of the idiots who wants to debate on APP? I have yet to see you successfully back up a single claim.

Pathetic
you-loser1.jpg
 
You've expressed other sentiments about civilian casualties not really mattering as long as we achieve our objectives, though. Not much difference there.

This is an interesting debate technique- moral equivalency. But it is a logical fallacy. If Hitler liked the color red and I like the color red, I must be just like Hitler.
 
My opinion of him matters little at this point but I would hardly class him as PC.

You might want to read up on him a bit because from a conservative point of view, then as well as now, he tried to offend as few people as possible. That's why the "no new taxes" boondoggle happened, and why he lost reelection.
 
Back
Top