"Limbaugh: Democrats who set up George W. Bush to go to war with Iraq"

Ahh, but all one has to do is watch/listen/read what the Murdoch media is putting out to see that is EXACTLY what they are suggesting with regards to the minority of left wing radicals spewing hate. There is an "audience of millions" for anyone who can broadcast on the net or cable or commercial TV. The rest of your screed is pure supposition and conjecture...unlike Fox News which boasts and brags of it's legion of followers via it's ratings and circulation. Again, you can show me a progressive or liberal or democratic group that spews the flip side of the garbage you see and hear on Fox News or Clear Channel or from the neocons or tea partiers in the last 20 years, I'm all ears. That means DOCMENTATION, NOT SPECULATION.

That is not speculation. Just spend some time listening to those commentators. A Randy Rhoads sounds just like Rush Limbaugh--"the Democrats/Republicans are a danger to this country and evil scumbags, petty, petty, petty, the media is dominated by liberals/conservatives..." Each diverts from the current issue to call attention to a previous president of the other party.

If you don't see the exact same methods your partisanship is covering up your objectivity. The conservative posters will give us the exact same argument as yours but for their side. Spewing hate comes from both sides. If you don't see the hate for Trump and his supporters you are blind.
 
Ginsburg is currently cancer free. She has defeated cancer three times. She may well die from cancer one day, but there is no reason to currently believe she will die from cancer. With the number of tests she is going through, we can be sure she is not currently dying from cancer.

Limbaugh is dying from cancer. We wish him all the luck in his treatment, but (according to him) the prognosis is not good. He does lie a lot, so it is hard to know the truth about how bad it really is. Working in his favor is he has a lot of money for treatment. Working against him is he is a drug addict with an inability to think straight.

I would never wish anybody death or anything harmful.
 
I would never wish anybody death or anything harmful.

I am sorry if I implied you did. No where in your post did you wish anything bad on Ginsburg.

I am correcting that she is not dying from cancer at the moment. She is 86 years old, has had cancer three times, and still can do 20 pushups on a daily basis. In short, she is TOUGH. Fat boys trump and limbaugh could learn a thing or two from her.
 
I am sorry if I implied you did. No where in your post did you wish anything bad on Ginsburg.

I am correcting that she is not dying from cancer at the moment. She is 86 years old, has had cancer three times, and still can do 20 pushups on a daily basis. In short, she is TOUGH. Fat boys trump and limbaugh could learn a thing or two from her.

I did not think you were implying I wanted anyone harmed. Thanks for correcting the information about Ginsberg. Some posters think she is already dead and has been replaced by an imposter. "On the Basis of Sex" is a pretty good movie about her life.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Ahh, but all one has to do is watch/listen/read what the Murdoch media is putting out to see that is EXACTLY what they are suggesting with regards to the minority of left wing radicals spewing hate. There is an "audience of millions" for anyone who can broadcast on the net or cable or commercial TV. The rest of your screed is pure supposition and conjecture...unlike Fox News which boasts and brags of it's legion of followers via it's ratings and circulation. Again, you can show me a progressive or liberal or democratic group that spews the flip side of the garbage you see and hear on Fox News or Clear Channel or from the neocons or tea partiers in the last 20 years, I'm all ears. That means DOCMENTATION, NOT SPECULATION.



That is not speculation. Just spend some time listening to those commentators. A Randy Rhoads sounds just like Rush Limbaugh--"the Democrats/Republicans are a danger to this country and evil scumbags, petty, petty, petty, the media is dominated by liberals/conservatives..." Each diverts from the current issue to call attention to a previous president of the other party.

If you don't see the exact same methods your partisanship is covering up your objectivity. The conservative posters will give us the exact same argument as yours but for their side. Spewing hate comes from both sides. If you don't see the hate for Trump and his supporters you are blind.

You demonstrate typical right wing myopia....I've highlighted EXACTLY what is required for you to validate your assertion. BOOKS have been written documenting the lies and distortions, documentation of racism that Limbaugh has spewed in the last 30 years

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/rush-limbaugh-racist-quotes/


The Way Things Aren't: Rush Limbaugh's Reign of Error 1995



....can you say the same for Rhoads? If you can't, that makes just a minor blowhard version of Limbaugh. Carry on.
 
You demonstrate typical right wing myopia....I've highlighted EXACTLY what is required for you to validate your assertion. BOOKS have been written documenting the lies and distortions, documentation of racism that Limbaugh has spewed in the last 30 years

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/rush-limbaugh-racist-quotes/


The Way Things Aren't: Rush Limbaugh's Reign of Error 1995

....can you say the same for Rhoads? If you can't, that makes just a minor blowhard version of Limbaugh. Carry on.

That is exactly what I said about Limbaugh. He misleads, promotes hate, etc. What you miss is that the left does the same thing. There are many books written about media bias by the left and all their people.

Right-wing myopia? I am not right-wing and criticized them as much as the left. You think if a person is critical of one side he must be defending the other--reread my posts.

What do you mean can I say the name for Randi Rhoads? I said it in my post. I have listened to her show and it is just like Limbaugh--full of hate, petty speculation, simplistic blaming of one side for all the world's problems....

The problem is you think none of this is true about the left because they are truthful. The right thinks the same thing. They both use the same tactics--smear the person making the accusation, point to something the other side did that was "worse," blame it on the media.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
You demonstrate typical right wing myopia....I've highlighted EXACTLY what is required for you to validate your assertion. BOOKS have been written documenting the lies and distortions, documentation of racism that Limbaugh has spewed in the last 30 years

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ru...racist-quotes/


The Way Things Aren't: Rush Limbaugh's Reign of Error 1995

....can you say the same for Rhoads? If you can't, that makes just a minor blowhard version of Limbaugh. Carry on.



That is exactly what I said about Limbaugh. He misleads, promotes hate, etc. What you miss is that the left does the same thing. There are many books written about media bias by the left and all their people.

Right-wing myopia? I am not right-wing and criticized them as much as the left. You think if a person is critical of one side he must be defending the other--reread my posts.

What do you mean can I say the name for Randi Rhoads? I said it in my post. I have listened to her show and it is just like Limbaugh--full of hate, petty speculation, simplistic blaming of one side for all the world's problems....

The problem is you think none of this is true about the left because they are truthful. The right thinks the same thing. They both use the same tactics--smear the person making the accusation, point to something the other side did that was "worse," blame it on the media.

You equate Rhoads with Limbaugh....I asked you to provide proof beyond your generalized opinion. Clearly, you can't do that. I've listened to Rhoads myself when she was available on AM in the NYC/Long Island area...she repeatedly stated that she is a "entertainer' with an opinion. Limbaugh has consistently categorize himself as an accurate social/political commentator.

Big difference that. Also, the GOP has twice given Limbaugh the highest citizens award Congress can give. Rhoads has yet to receive any such thing from the Dems.

Your comparison is hanging by a hair's breadth only.
 
Gotta wonder: how many weeks before Rush & the other right wing pundits start saying that it was Democrats who tried to downplay the coronavirus?
 
Gotta wonder: how many weeks before Rush & the other right wing pundits start saying that it was Democrats who tried to downplay the coronavirus?

Or DEMOCRATS invented it with money from Soros and planted it in China knowing that it would spread around the world, giving DEMS plausible deniability.
 
Back
Top