DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
With this new standard of yours, I am now able to quote, say, an expert on Psychiatry if a certain behavior is healthy, and you must accept it as gospel fact. 

With this new standard of yours, I am now able to quote, say, an expert on Psychiatry if a certain behavior is healthy, and you must accept it as gospel fact.![]()
I'm looking forward to quoting the Solitary Standard when you attempt to dismiss my next reference.![]()
No its not natural. I'm sure I'll be able to quote an expert that agrees with me. Then it will be gospel fact.
Who determines who qualifies as an expert?
We all know that experts never disagree with each other.
Appeal to popularity.
I see its time to pack up for the mountains. I'll leave y'all to obsess and plot....
Not at all. But if you find a single biologist who says homosexual behavior never occurs in nature, and I have quoted 3 who say it does (including one who has spent her career studying dolphins), then my references out weigh yours.
Counting up debate points, I win.![]()
Three, I think, for me. None for you.![]()