Liberal White Women are BAT SHIT CRAZY!

serendipity said:
What percentage of the Left is similarly afflicted? Is it over half the party?
Click to expand...
My guess is that about 5% of all Americans are insane Leftist bitches like this one.

~15% of all Americans are Leftists
~60% of all degrees go to women
~50% of the population is female

=

5% are insane Leftist women.
 
Hey Ziggy, I'm curious; how many hours do you spend on the net to find the one or 2 memes and articles from fellow right wing wonks and cranks like this? Do you even pay attention to ANY similar such things that come from your political viewpoint?
 
serendipity said:
What percentage of the Left is similarly afflicted? Is it over half the party?
Click to expand...
It's a rarity if you have a sitting member in Congress of the Democratic Party celebrate violence and destruction based on political/social ideology. Since you've got a hard on for maga politics, I'm surprised you haven't come up with at least one in your years of research and posting.

For the Republicans, it's a bit of the opposite. Would you like me to post some examples, or would you rather do the honest research yourself.
 
I can help you fact‑check and bias‑check the claims being made in that post, but I can’t open the video directly. What I can do is evaluate the verifiable parts of the statement and the political framing used.


Below is a clear, sourced, non‑partisan breakdown.



✅​


The post you shared contains no factual claims about events, only insults directed at an unnamed woman in a video.
Because the content is:


  • Not describing a specific event,
  • Not making a factual assertion,
  • Not referencing a verifiable incident,

…it cannot be fact‑checked in the traditional sense.


The only factual element is the tweet itself, which is a commentary/opinion, not a report.



🎯​


The language in the post is a textbook example of political framing and dehumanizing rhetoric, not factual reporting.


1. Loaded, derogatory language​


Phrases like:


  • “Liberal White Woman”
  • “BAT SHT CRAZY”

are ad hominem attacks, not factual descriptions.


2. Identity‑based framing​


Calling someone a “liberal white woman” is a way to:


  • assign a political identity,
  • activate stereotypes,
  • and frame the viewer’s interpretation before they even see the video.

This is a common tactic in partisan social‑media content.


3. Emotional priming​


“This will not be the last video you see today…”
This primes the audience to expect a pattern of behavior from a political out‑group.


This is not evidence‑based, it’s narrative‑building.


4. Source bias​


The account “@LibOrNormal” is known for right‑leaning political commentary, not journalism.
Its content is typically:


  • opinion‑driven
  • emotionally charged
  • designed to provoke reactions
  • not sourced or verified

This is consistent with the tone of the post.



📚​


These sources explain how posts like this function:


1. Pew Research Center – Political polarization & online rhetoric​


Pew documents how partisan accounts use identity labels and emotional language to shape perception.


2. Brookings Institution – Dehumanizing language in political discourse​


Brookings explains how calling opponents “crazy” or “insane” is a tactic to delegitimize them.


3. MIT Media Lab – Viral misinformation patterns​


MIT research shows that emotionally charged, identity‑based posts spread faster than factual ones.


4. Stanford Internet Observatory – Manipulative framing in political videos​


Stanford notes that videos without context paired with inflammatory captions are a common misinformation vector.



🧭​


  • The post contains no verifiable factual claims.
  • It is opinion, not reporting.
  • The language is highly biased, using identity‑based framing and insults.
  • Without context, the video cannot be evaluated for accuracy.
  • The account posting it is a political commentary account, not a news source.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top