Liar, Liar

I think the Broaddrick rape is the one I remember. I believe it. Clinton was pretty full of himself, especially after he won the governor's race. The other claims were various harassment and acts of perversion, not unlike Kavanaugh.
I don’t, she either lied under oath or lied when she was’t under oath. She can’t have it both ways, under oath, she said it didn’t happen. That’s the story I believe. Wiley is more believable. Her story has never changed.
 
not even close. an occasional reference on my part is not long winded typical screed like Nomad's.
You need better comprehension skills

You should try reading some of your own nonsense.

It's difficult I know, kind of like listening to Trump speak, but you should at least try.

Might be eye-opening.
 
You asked why nobody is hiring an investigator. When Biden wins, people will worry about it.

Sorry, but I doubt it unless they just want to blow smoke like Trump does when he wants to distract people. There is nothing to stop any group or person to hire private investigators to investigate Kavanaugh's history as a drinker and his claim of being a virgin until after college. Why wait unless it is purely for partisan politics?

2iqxj1.jpg
 
I love ceviche, halibut is my favorite, it was easier to find in Alaska then it is here.

I've had Conche "ceviche" in Key West and the Bahamas a few times although I don't recall them calling it that. Same principle: "cooking" the meat with lemon or lime juice.
 
You should try reading some of your own nonsense.

It's difficult I know, kind of like listening to Trump speak, but you should at least try.

Might be eye-opening.
when you actually contribute something besides a partisan rant, i miht consider it
 
not even close. an occasional reference on my part is not long winded typical screed like Nomad's.
You need better comprehension skills

Dude, you do it all the time. You're known for it. It's one reason why, like the TD twins and a few others, I think you are mentally ill. Normal people don't hate like you do.
 
I don’t, she either lied under oath or lied when she was’t under oath. She can’t have it both ways, under oath, she said it didn’t happen. That’s the story I believe. Wiley is more believable. Her story has never changed.
Broaddrick? I seem to remember that she wasn't credible enough to make a case, but Clinton was known to have had the state police watch out while he was in hotel rooms as governor.
 
Sorry, but I doubt it unless they just want to blow smoke like Trump does when he wants to distract people. There is nothing to stop any group or person to hire private investigators to investigate Kavanaugh's history as a drinker and his claim of being a virgin until after college. Why wait unless it is purely for partisan politics?

2iqxj1.jpg
Any investigation would entail all the women that he exposed himself to while in college. His roommate seems to confirm his actions. I don't know if they'll ever prove the attempted rape, but if they keep digging it's possible.

None of which does anything but make him impeachable. Doing it now just brings another turd to the bench. Who knows what will happen when trump is gone. Don't forget that Barr won't allow any type of case to be brought under his watch. Unless these will be civil cases by his victims?
 
Any investigation would entail all the women that he exposed himself to while in college. His roommate seems to confirm his actions. I don't know if they'll ever prove the attempted rape, but if they keep digging it's possible.

None of which does anything but make him impeachable. Doing it now just brings another turd to the bench. Who knows what will happen when trump is gone. Don't forget that Barr won't allow any type of case to be brought under his watch. Unless these will be civil cases by his victims?

I'd question his drinking buds to find out when Bart first bragged about losing his virginity. If it differs from his public claims, then that's also impeachable. All of his testimony should be fact-checked for perjury.
 
I'd question his drinking buds to find out when Bart first bragged about losing his virginity. If it differs from his public claims, then that's also impeachable. All of his testimony should be fact-checked for perjury.
Yes. And that's all that is possible. Getting rid of him. Which will do nothing until trump is gone. It's obvious he's a liar. First we need to get a Senate majority so that Ginsburg can retire in peace.
 
Yes. And that's all that is possible. Getting rid of him. Which will do nothing until trump is gone. It's obvious he's a liar. First we need to get a Senate majority so that Ginsburg can retire in peace.

The election will be close. What are the odds the Democrats will take the Senate?

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...outbreak-trumps-uneven-response-idUSKCN22A2ZM
“It’s basically around 50-50,” Kyle Kondik, an elections analyst at the University of Virginia, said of the Senate odds. “For most of this cycle, I had things leaning to the Republicans. The playing field has gotten somewhat bigger, and the states we knew were going to be competitive have gotten a little better for Democrats over time.”
 
The election will be close. What are the odds the Democrats will take the Senate?

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...outbreak-trumps-uneven-response-idUSKCN22A2ZM
“It’s basically around 50-50,” Kyle Kondik, an elections analyst at the University of Virginia, said of the Senate odds. “For most of this cycle, I had things leaning to the Republicans. The playing field has gotten somewhat bigger, and the states we knew were going to be competitive have gotten a little better for Democrats over time.”
It will once again hinge on turnout. Republicans have more seats up than Dems, which is the opposite of '18. If current trends continue, it might be possible. McConnell is hated almost as much as Graham.
 
It will once again hinge on turnout. Republicans have more seats up than Dems, which is the opposite of '18. If current trends continue, it might be possible. McConnell is hated almost as much as Graham.

One party controlling all of Congress vs. a President on the opposite party forces both sides to work with each other.

Do you think Election 2020 will see a higher turnout or a lower turnout compared to 2016? 2018?
 
One party controlling all of Congress vs. a President on the opposite party forces both sides to work with each other.

Do you think Election 2020 will see a higher turnout or a lower turnout compared to 2016? 2018?
The only turnout that matters is Independents. Kids and non white voters chose not to vote in '16. '18 saw an improvement. You never know what the kids will do. They were motivated by mass shootings last year. I don't see much about that these days.
 
The only turnout that matters is Independents. Kids and non white voters chose not to vote in '16. '18 saw an improvement. You never know what the kids will do. They were motivated by mass shootings last year. I don't see much about that these days.

Agreed they are the swing voters, but is a low showing in one party is countered by a slightly larger showing in the opposite party, that could make the difference in the outcome.
 
:rofl2::rofl2::rofl2:

so quaint.. so uninformed - see my sig

Dems didn't invent Stormy. They didn't invent Trump not releasing his returns - which he said he'd do.

Isn't there just a little about Trump that gives you pause? I know you can deal w/ all of the "boor" stuff, but what about him makes you think he has anyone's interests in mind aside from his own?

He's a poor leader. I know you think he's standing up to China & deregulating and all that, but he has a very short-term vision for everything. He's not setting us up well for the future.
 
Agreed they are the swing voters, but is a low showing in one party is countered by a slightly larger showing in the opposite party, that could make the difference in the outcome.
Yes. But I'm sure we both agree that both parties are extremely motivated to vote. Only voter suppression will keep Democrats from the polls.
 
Back
Top