LGBTQ rights in Russia

gfm7175 said:
You're missing the point... it's not truly about WHEN, it's about WHY any such events haven't ever been held in any of those places...
Click to expand...
Only in places where the people are kind and generally willing to tolerate/endure abusive LGBTTQQIAXXXXXXX+ supremacy (for a while) would the LGBTTQQIAXXXXXXX+ movement thrust their abusiveness onto the people. The places you mentioned will certainly invite them to come on over and find out just how far their tolerance goes, maybe even extending to the roof of a tall building. The places you mentioned don't appreciate anyone exposing their children to sexual behavior, i.e. they know who the true victims are.
 
Scott said:
Almost. Same-sex marriage is neither recognized or performed in some tribal nations in the US:

Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...
Soooooooooooo the issue isn't really about "equality" after all, but is actually about the fact that there are still SOOOOOME people SOOOOOOMEWHERE within the USA who do not (or otherwise refuse to) recognize so-called "same-sex marriage"?

Actually, let me rephrase that. --- The issue isn't about "equality" after all, but is actually about the fact that it REEEEEEEEEEALLY burns your grits that there is still at least ONE lone person out there SOMEWHERE within the USA who refuses to grant [any LGBTQ-related movement] unfettered SUPREMACY over ANY and ALL people who don't possess a "membership card".

Am I understanding this correctly? ... because that's what you just got done telling me here...


P.S. -- All references to Wikipedia have been (and will continue to be) summarily dismissed upon sight. I do not accept Wikipedia as a valid source of anything.
 
IBDaMann said:
Sure. Your movement attacks straight people who don't acknowledge your supremacy. You call them your oppressive victimizers, while you refer to yourself as an oppressed victim suffering in oppressive victimhood.

You seek to marginalize straight people and normalize LGBTTQQIAXXXXXXX+ supremacy.
Click to expand...
Wow. You truly are dumb. It's astounding.
 
gfm7175 said:
Soooooooooooo the issue isn't really about "equality" after all, but is actually about the fact that there are still SOOOOOME people SOOOOOOMEWHERE within the USA who do not (or otherwise refuse to) recognize so-called "same-sex marriage"?

Actually, let me rephrase that. --- The issue isn't about "equality" after all, but is actually about the fact that it REEEEEEEEEEALLY burns your grits that there is still at least ONE lone person out there SOMEWHERE within the USA who refuses to grant [any LGBTQ-related movement] unfettered SUPREMACY over ANY and ALL people who don't possess a "membership card".

Am I understanding this correctly? ... because that's what you just got done telling me here...


P.S. -- All references to Wikipedia have been (and will continue to be) summarily dismissed upon sight. I do not accept Wikipedia as a valid source of anything.
Click to expand...
Parroting @IBDaMann.
 
AProudLefty said:
Parroting @IBDaMann.
Click to expand...
Tipping your king yet again.

giphy.webp
 
IBDaMann said:
You've got nothing. This is what happens when you back yourself into a corner while not knowing anything and while being too lazy to think anything through.
Click to expand...
You claimed that LGBT is a movement. You also claimed that there is no history of violence against gay and transgender people.
 
IBDaMann said:
When you forfeit, my victory is assured.
Click to expand...
Assumption of victory fallacy.

All you did was inventing a group and assigned an invented movement to it.

Also you denied the violence.

So no inventing things doesn't win you anything.

You're really bad at this. I'm sure you're bad at chess.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top