Let’s just say it: The Republicans are the problem.

Gatorman said:
poet, I don't know you at all except through this monitor but if you held a public event and I thought for one moment any of these idiots were planning to show up for a personal with you then you can be assured I would also be there with my 62 year old ass. I don't play either in situations like that. So if any of these turdlickers want some Gator that can also spin a line like a Dreidel it can be arranged. Thunder and lightning ain't got shit on me.
Click to expand...

Thank you, my friend. Between you and I, and my European partner, we wouldn't even need the facebook posse, to handle these girls. You hear that "ladies"? Put on your big girl panties, and let's dance.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
I think it would be funny to wait until he reveals another place he's going to be, like he did for Houston's Aids Awerness Day, and show up.
Wait unitl he's mingling with the crowd, walk up, shake his hand, and then say "OK, I"m here. You said you could kick my ass and now you have the opportunity."
I would have to bring along someone to film it, so I could YouTube him running away and screaming for security.
Click to expand...
it's his own fears and insecurities that make him believe I want to kick his ass. It's saddening, because I'm not in to violence. I think he'd be unhappily surprised to find out i'm not the racist he claims me to be, but it's his own issues that prevent him from meeting new people, not mine.
 
poet said:
Really? One on one? Public? I don't agree to meet with folks whom I don't know what they're capable of, in private. You might have a gun. In fact, I would count on it. You're militia, right? Do you leave home without it? Didn't think so. And a film crew would be in tow, as well as half the gay community, along with my Houston Facebook posse. You can bring your KKK buddies, and let's find out who does a better "four corners". You're dumber than dirt. Not pissed off, at all. By what? I'm a goddamn liberal, yes indeed. And my white posse will kick the racism out of you. Say when.
Click to expand...
this is what I was talking about. you're all up in to violence, with backup I might add, but one on one or outnumbered, you fold like a cheap card table. You're the perfect subject in the governments eyes. ready to bow down and say 'yes, massa'. wouldn't that make you an uncle tom?
 
SmarterThanYou said:
it's his own fears and insecurities that make him believe I want to kick his ass. It's saddening, because I'm not in to violence. I think he'd be unhappily surprised to find out i'm not the racist he claims me to be, but it's his own issues that prevent him from meeting new people, not mine.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't lower myself. Nice dodge. Got out of that confrontation, quick fast and in a hurry. Coward. Assures me that your penchant for guns is Freudian-based....if you know what I mean.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
it's his own fears and insecurities that make him believe I want to kick his ass. It's saddening, because I'm not in to violence. I think he'd be unhappily surprised to find out i'm not the racist he claims me to be, but it's his own issues that prevent him from meeting new people, not mine.
Click to expand...

I go by what I've seen out of your turdlicking self. You appear to me to at least want to be mean, racist and out of control. I can fix that for ya, dumberthananyoneIevermet.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
this is what I was talking about. you're all up in to violence, with backup I might add, but one on one or outnumbered, you fold like a cheap card table. You're the perfect subject in the governments eyes. ready to bow down and say 'yes, massa'. wouldn't that make you an uncle tom?
Click to expand...

Bitch, you're the one in a goddamn militia. How can you be a militia "of one"? Knowing full well, you would have to have "back up", to back up your big girl panty talk.
A "perfect subject in the government's eyes"? What the fuck is that supposed to mean. You don't even know, or can't express it. And you obviously don't know the meaning of the term , "Uncle Tom"......it means one that caters to the whims of whites, acting subservient, and suppliant. The opposite of me. Stupid bitch.

An Uncle Tom would be Allen West, Herman Cain, Larry Elder, Thomas Sowell, Ward Connerly, Ron Christie, Clarence Thomas, or any other black Republican apologist.
 
poet said:
I wouldn't lower myself. Nice dodge. Got out of that confrontation, quick fast and in a hurry. Coward. Assures me that your penchant for guns is Freudian-based....if you know what I mean.
Click to expand...
you were the fuckwad talking about violence between us. I never mentioned it at all. that's not a dodge, that's just your plain truth. don't like it? too fucking bad. it is what it is. and remember, you're the one avoiding the one on one.
 
poet said:
Bitch, you're the one in a goddamn militia. How can you be a militia "of one"? Knowing full well, you would have to have "back up", to back up your big girl panty talk.
A "perfect subject in the government's eyes"? What the fuck is that supposed to mean. You don't even know, or can't express it. And you obviously don't know the meaning of the term , "Uncle Tom"......it means one that caters to the whims of whites, acting subservient, and suppliant. The opposite of me. Stupid bitch.
Click to expand...
LOL, look at you blather on like the fool you've always been. not even aware that you're the biggest uncle tom out there.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
LOL, look at you blather on like the fool you've always been. not even aware that you're the biggest uncle tom out there.
Click to expand...

How would you know? You're confused. Whites cannot qualify an "Uncle Tom". It's a derogatory term blacks apply to blacks who have sold out. You must think you have license to use "Uncle Tom" as you would "the n-word". You can't use pejoratives against blacks without being perceived as racist. You don't get it. Not my problem.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
you were the fuckwad talking about violence between us. I never mentioned it at all. that's not a dodge, that's just your plain truth. don't like it? too fucking bad. it is what it is. and remember, you're the one avoiding the one on one.
Click to expand...

Who mentioned violence against "you"? You do realize that everyone can follow the fucking thread?
You wrote:

Originally Posted by SmarterThanYou

yes, you're a coward. you wouldn't even meet me one on one. had to be 'public', scared of me that i might have my gun. i'm 10x smarter than you, which pisses you off. All you understand is liberalism and racism. nothing more.
Click to expand...

What would you be wanting to meet me "one on one" about? The tea in China? You are the one that "implied" violence. Your one, on my one. Damn fool.
The only way I'd meet you one on one, is if I were armed...and I'm anti-gun. So, if we meet, it's going to be in public, with a crowd, and tv cameras, so I can have footage of your ass whooping.
 
poet said:
Thank you, my friend. Between you and I, and my European partner, we wouldn't even need the facebook posse, to handle these girls. You hear that "ladies"? Put on your big girl panties, and let's dance.
Click to expand...

Gonna be a big ball in CowTown!!!
 
SmarterThanYou said:
it's his own fears and insecurities that make him believe I want to kick his ass. It's saddening, because I'm not in to violence. I think he'd be unhappily surprised to find out i'm not the racist he claims me to be, but it's his own issues that prevent him from meeting new people, not mine.
Click to expand...

I still think it would be funnier then shit.
Just the look of "OH SHIT", on his face, would be worth the trip.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
 
SmarterThanYou said:
you were the fuckwad talking about violence between us. I never mentioned it at all. that's not a dodge, that's just your plain truth. don't like it? too fucking bad. it is what it is. and remember, you're the one avoiding the one on one.
Click to expand...

Wasn't it his comment, that started this exchange?

poet said:
Cowardly? Bitch, please. You don't intimidate anyone. You're not very bright to begin with. Nothing about me is cowardly. If you were here, we could "catch a square".
If you understood politics, we could have a discussion.
Click to expand...
 
SmarterThanYou said:
regulating and controlling the diets, lifestyles, and other actions of citizens is not considered freedom. just in case you were wondering.
Click to expand...


I thought it was the Repubs telling people how to live. Aren't they against gay marriage?

The only diet I can recall is the Libs wanting to ensure children ate properly. I know the Repubs are more concerned about fetuses than children. At least, that's their story. The truth is they just want to punish women for having sex.

Thank God for the freedom revolution of the 60s. You should have been there! :cheer:
 
apple0154 said:
I thought it was the Repubs telling people how to live. Aren't they against gay marriage?

The only diet I can recall is the Libs wanting to ensure children ate properly. I know the Repubs are more concerned about fetuses than children. At least, that's their story. The truth is they just want to punish women for having sex.

Thank God for the freedom revolution of the 60s. You should have been there! :cheer:
Click to expand...

You just said a lot there, apple. I hope some of these puritans take a look at it.
 
poet said:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...-the-problem/2012/04/27/gIQAxCVUlT_story.html
Rep. Allen West, a Florida Republican, was recently captured on video asserting that there are “78 to 81” Democrats in Congress who are members of the Communist Party. Of course, it’s not unusual for some renegade lawmaker from either side of the aisle to say something outrageous. What made West’s comment — right out of the McCarthyite playbook of the 1950s — so striking was the almost complete lack of condemnation from Republican congressional leaders or other major party figures, including the remaining presidential candidates.

It’s not that the GOP leadership agrees with West; it is that such extreme remarks and views are now taken for granted.



We have been studying Washington politics and Congress for more than 40 years, and never have we seen them this dysfunctional. In our past writings, we have criticized both parties when we believed it was warranted. Today, however, we have no choice but to acknowledge that the core of the problem lies with the Republican Party.

The GOP has become an insurgent outlier in American politics. It is ideologically extreme; scornful of compromise; unmoved by conventional understanding of facts, evidence and science; and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition.

When one party moves this far from the mainstream, it makes it nearly impossible for the political system to deal constructively with the country’s challenges.

“Both sides do it” or “There is plenty of blame to go around” are the traditional refuges for an American news media intent on proving its lack of bias, while political scientists prefer generality and neutrality when discussing partisan polarization. Many self-styled bipartisan groups, in their search for common ground, propose solutions that move both sides to the center, a strategy that is simply untenable when one side is so far out of reach.

It is clear that the center of gravity in the Republican Party has shifted sharply to the right. Its once-legendary moderate and center-right legislators in the House and the Senate — think Bob Michel, Mickey Edwards, John Danforth, Chuck Hagel — are virtually extinct.

The post-McGovern Democratic Party, by contrast, while losing the bulk of its conservative Dixiecrat contingent in the decades after the civil rights revolution, has retained a more diverse base. Since the Clinton presidency, it has hewed to the center-left on issues from welfare reform to fiscal policy. While the Democrats may have moved from their 40-yard line to their 25, the Republicans have gone from their 40 to somewhere behind their goal post.

What happened? Of course, there were larger forces at work beyond the realignment of the South. They included the mobilization of social conservatives after the 1973Roe v. Wade decision, the anti-tax movement launched in 1978 by California’s Proposition 13, the rise of conservative talk radio after a congressional pay raise in 1989, and the emergence of Fox News and right-wing blogs. But the real move to the bedrock right starts with two names: Newt Gingrich and Grover Norquist.

full article at site.
Click to expand...

Quite humorous... especially given that it is the Dems that are intent on eliminating their moderates.
 
Gatorman said:
poet, I don't know you at all except through this monitor but if you held a public event and I thought for one moment any of these idiots were planning to show up for a personal with you then you can be assured I would also be there with my 62 year old ass. I don't play either in situations like that. So if any of these turdlickers want some Gator that can also spin a line like a Dreidel it can be arranged. Thunder and lightning ain't got shit on me.
Click to expand...

LMAO...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top