Leteicia James has been

So you think getting an indictment is difficult, even in "liberal" eastern VA? Have you ever heard the "ham sandwich" comparison?

Dude <smh> Come up with something better.
If they had nothing the grand jury would have let a fellow Trump hater go. I predict she will lose her law license over this.

The latest news is one of the homes is lived in by a felon that is a FUGITIVE from North Carolina and has indictments in two different states. This keeps getting better and better. :laugh: The woman is fat Tish's grandniece.
 
Last edited:
Ok but we already know that about the Trump conviction as the bank and Insurance companies were both due more money than he defrauded him of, if he had not filed fraudelent doc;s.

Why are you revisiting that? Oh that is right you denied it prior but now you agree.
factually wrong and idiotic
 
If they had nothing the grand jury would have let a fellow Trump hater go. I predict she will lose her law license over this.

The latest news is one of the homes is lived in by a felon that is a FUGITIVE from North Carolina and has indictments in two different states. This keeps getting better and better. :laugh: The woman is fat Tish's grandniece.
They're both in big trouble...;)
Her rant was epic, though...the world got treated to what a lunatic she really is...
 
All real estate loans have collateral, Poorboy.

Correct.

Property collateral is nothing to do with 'personal guarantees', Poorboy.

You are describing yourself again.

In fact, I have done exactly that! Business loans are not real estate loans.

None.

Nope. The only requirement is that the bank is satisfied with taking the risk of the loan, and they were.

Nope. As long as the loan payments are being made, the loan stays intact. Personal net worth is no longer being monitored at all.

Business loans HAVE collateral.

Nope. The bank can seize the assets of the business that you put up for collateral.

True.

Nope. To make a business loan, you must first have the business (the LLC). The loan is in the name of the LLC.

Nope. They require collateral, which is the assets of the LLC...in this case, the property itself.

Nope. They will take the building and property and sell it what they can get for it. Property values generally go up, but there ARE exceptions. In that case, the bank loses money on the deal.

Nope. You owe nothing, The LLC is bankrupt.

If YOU took out such a loan personally, than YOU would be bankrupt.

Okay...just for giggles and grins, let's say you claim this asset is worth $1 million to the bank. The bank will look at the property and determine that you are full of it and not issue the loan.

YOU are not the LLC. 100% of the 'shares' of the property in question is the LLC's. The loan application is by the LLC.

YOU are not the LLC. 100% of the property is collateral.

No such requirement. As long as the LLC makes payments on the loan, it remains intact. If the loan is paid, the loan is satisfied.

YOU are not the LLC.

IF you use LLC assets for personal use, the LLC is effectively dissolved, and YOU are exposed to that liability if the loan fails.
If there are other members in the LLC, you have defrauded them by breach of contract (the LLC constitution). This is theft, and can easily land you in jail on felony charges.

Under the State of Washington law, this can be construed as a class A felony. This would result in a penalty of at least twenty years in jail (up to life imprisonment), and up to $50,000 fine. A bankruptcy cannot erase that fine.

As far as the bank is concerned, they will collect their collateral (the property), and sell it for what they can get for it, since the loan failed.
You have not defrauded the bank, but you HAVE defrauded any other members in the LLC.
Clearly you don't know the first thing about business loans and LLCs. If I own an LLC, that LLC is a personal asset. How can you be so stupid that you don't know what you own is an asset?
 
Good betting money is this lawyer is added to the list of those sanctioned and disbarred after doing Trumps bidding.



'A huge problem': DOJ may have withheld evidence suggesting Letitia James’ innocence


U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan may have left out important information in her indictment against New York AG Letitia James that might have derailed some charges.

“In the indictment, … Halligan accuses Ms. James of having misrepresented the purpose of the house when she purchased it in August 2020 for $137,000,” reports the Times. “The indictment says that while Ms. James indicated to her mortgage broker that she expected to use the house as a second home, she had instead used it as a “rental investment property, renting the property to a family.”

Only it does not look like she rented it at all.

The Times reports occupant Nakia Thompson — Letitia James’ grandniece — testified to a grand jury in Norfolk, VA. that she “had lived in the house for years (with her children) and that she did not pay rent,”...

...prosecutors did not ask Nakia Thompson to testify again, and the grand jury that voted to indict Letitia James was not seated in Norfolk, where this information was revealed, but in Alexandria....

...she suspected prosecutors “used the other grand jury for testimony, then moved things over to Alexandria to seek indictment.”...

...“Did Halligan present this exculpatory evidence?” … If not, or if she explained it away without proper basis, the government already has a huge problem in the James case.”

Federal rules on the presentation of evidence state that “It is the policy of the Department of Justice … that when a prosecutor conducting a grand jury inquiry is personally aware of substantial evidence that directly negates the guilt of a subject of the investigation, the prosecutor must present or otherwise disclose such evidence to the grand jury before seeking an indictment against such a person.”

The rules further state that appellate courts “may refer violations of the policy to the Office of Professional Responsibility for review.”...
She’s so out of her league, she had to be tutored by the judge, there were spelling errors and filing incorrect paperwork in some cases. She should go back to insurance before she loses her livelihood.
 
They have the signed documents that shows her fraud.
Ya but the problem is i already debunked that lie by you.

A fraud is not just a signed document and DOES NOT exist if you cannot prove intent. BOTH PARTS are necessary to prove fraud and you won't address part 2 as you cannot, honestly.
 
"No one is above the law."

As the far left loons told us 9087 times.
Yes. And this accurate.

And since it seems clear Letisha acted within the law, no one is saying she is above the law and that will be demonstrated in the proceedings to come as the case is thrown out.

Just as Trump was not above the law and when subjected to the law was found guilty and has been found to be both a fraudster and rapist/Sexual assaulter.
 
She’s so out of her league, she had to be tutored by the judge, there were spelling errors and filing incorrect paperwork in some cases. She should go back to insurance before she loses her livelihood.
I think the likelihood she is sanctioned and disbarred is super high.

I am betting that someone in Trumps orbit gave her exactly what to present to the grand jury (no way she went thru the years of evidence in a day) and they removed all the exculpatory evidence that prior DA's had rejected the case after reviewing and prior Grand Jury(s) had refused to indict over.

She is not going to be able to say 'i did not review the material... it was given to me by others to present to the Grand Jury' as an excuse when the Judge or BAR asks her why she broke DOJ rules and policy.

90% she ends both sanctioned and disbarred and those in Trump orbit who picked her, knew that but determined she was loyal enough and dumb enough that they could just get her to do it.
 
I think the likelihood she is sanctioned and disbarred is super high.

I am betting that someone in Trumps orbit gave her exactly what to present to the grand jury (no way she went thru the years of evidence in a day) and they removed all the exculpatory evidence that prior DA's had rejected the case after reviewing and prior Grand Jury(s) had refused to indict over.

She is not going to be able to say 'i did not review the material... it was given to me by others to present to the Grand Jury' as an excuse when the Judge or BAR asks her why she broke DOJ rules and policy.

90% she ends both sanctioned and disbarred and those in Trump orbit who picked her, knew that but determined she was loyal enough and dumb enough that they could just get her to do it.
I don’t not understand ruining your life for DonOld, but many appear willing to do it, it’s crazy.
 
When was Trump convicted of entering into and[sic] NDA?
You cult members believe the most idiotic things are true. I guess you have to be so gullible or you wouldn't be in your cult.

Trump being convicted 34 times for entering into an NDA with Stormy Daniels and Michael Avenatti - darling rockstar of the democrat party and convicted fraudster, is the greatest achievement of you Fascists.

The brutal and violent rape of American Jurisprudence was a spectacle not seen in America since democrats in Mississippi were running similar courts in 1920 to try black men of raping white women.

You must be so proud.
 
Back
Top