Into the Night
Verified User
It is EXACTLY like taking a 2nd mortgage out on your home.
Vacuous fallacy.
Leteicia James has been
- Thread starter FastLane
- Start date
QP!
Verified User
Good betting money is this lawyer is added to the list of those sanctioned and disbarred after doing Trumps bidding.
U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan may have left out important information in her indictment against New York AG Letitia James that might have derailed some charges.
“In the indictment, … Halligan accuses Ms. James of having misrepresented the purpose of the house when she purchased it in August 2020 for $137,000,” reports the Times. “The indictment says that while Ms. James indicated to her mortgage broker that she expected to use the house as a second home, she had instead used it as a “rental investment property, renting the property to a family.”
Only it does not look like she rented it at all.
The Times reports occupant Nakia Thompson — Letitia James’ grandniece — testified to a grand jury in Norfolk, VA. that she “had lived in the house for years (with her children) and that she did not pay rent,”...
...prosecutors did not ask Nakia Thompson to testify again, and the grand jury that voted to indict Letitia James was not seated in Norfolk, where this information was revealed, but in Alexandria....
...she suspected prosecutors “used the other grand jury for testimony, then moved things over to Alexandria to seek indictment.”...
...“Did Halligan present this exculpatory evidence?” … If not, or if she explained it away without proper basis, the government already has a huge problem in the James case.”
Federal rules on the presentation of evidence state that “It is the policy of the Department of Justice … that when a prosecutor conducting a grand jury inquiry is personally aware of substantial evidence that directly negates the guilt of a subject of the investigation, the prosecutor must present or otherwise disclose such evidence to the grand jury before seeking an indictment against such a person.”
The rules further state that appellate courts “may refer violations of the policy to the Office of Professional Responsibility for review.”...
'A huge problem': DOJ may have withheld evidence suggesting Letitia James’ innocence
U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan may have left out important information in her indictment against New York AG Letitia James that might have derailed some charges.
“In the indictment, … Halligan accuses Ms. James of having misrepresented the purpose of the house when she purchased it in August 2020 for $137,000,” reports the Times. “The indictment says that while Ms. James indicated to her mortgage broker that she expected to use the house as a second home, she had instead used it as a “rental investment property, renting the property to a family.”
Only it does not look like she rented it at all.
The Times reports occupant Nakia Thompson — Letitia James’ grandniece — testified to a grand jury in Norfolk, VA. that she “had lived in the house for years (with her children) and that she did not pay rent,”...
...prosecutors did not ask Nakia Thompson to testify again, and the grand jury that voted to indict Letitia James was not seated in Norfolk, where this information was revealed, but in Alexandria....
...she suspected prosecutors “used the other grand jury for testimony, then moved things over to Alexandria to seek indictment.”...
...“Did Halligan present this exculpatory evidence?” … If not, or if she explained it away without proper basis, the government already has a huge problem in the James case.”
Federal rules on the presentation of evidence state that “It is the policy of the Department of Justice … that when a prosecutor conducting a grand jury inquiry is personally aware of substantial evidence that directly negates the guilt of a subject of the investigation, the prosecutor must present or otherwise disclose such evidence to the grand jury before seeking an indictment against such a person.”
The rules further state that appellate courts “may refer violations of the policy to the Office of Professional Responsibility for review.”...
OMG, trump couldn't find a career prosecutor to take the case against James or Comey so he hired his insurance salesman to do it - this is really NOT going to end well for trump or his DOJNew York Attorney General Letitia James has been indicted on at least one count of alleged fraud, becoming the second political figure in a span of just three weeks to face prosecution after President Donald Trump's public demand that the Justice Department move "now" to charge his enemies.
The contents of the indictment were still not unsealed as of Thursday late afternoon.
U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia Lindsey Halligan presented evidence to a federal grand jury Thursday seeking an indictment on charges of mortgage fraud against James, sources familiar with the matter tell ABC News. ...
============================================
I bet she no longer has that smug smile on her face
Because she went after your daddy? What a cuck you are!
Yep, America is misogynist and racist - so we're going to banish the black woman and bring in a goon. Great move, America!
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
It stands period , that's how the law works you dumb peckerwood, it doesn't stay o;pen until appeals and good luck with appeals ,as the courts in NYC aren't bought off like MAGA friendly courts in jesusland yokel flyover statesDonald Trump's 34 felony convictions have not yet been adjudicated on appeal.
His "guilt" stands for now but the appeals process is not finished. This will never survive the appeals process.
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
Tommy is just a dumb farang fuck living in a 3td world shithole , King Rama X is watching him.
The appeal can go all the way to the SCOTUS yeah that court.
Trump is a shoe in for the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize. So do you thnk the NY court of appeals will left Trump's convictions stand.
I hope @serendipity makes a serendipitous discovery of a bar a soap and learns to use it!
Silly he doesn't want to scrub your hairy smelly back!
Last edited:
Well James defrauded her insurance company too. So she certainly knows insurance laws.OMG, trump couldn't find a career prosecutor to take the case against James or Comey so he hired his insurance salesman to do it - this is really NOT going to end well for trump or his DOJ
My back gets shaved, daily by the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders. Also, my balls.
"James defrauded her insurance company.." according to trump's DOJ. That and 10 cents won't even buy you stick of gum anymore.
They have the signed documents that shows her fraud.
Yeah? Cool! So, I guess you don't think the case will be thrown out before it even goes to trial?
Nope. Remember a grand jury in liberal Eastern Virginia handed down the indictment.
I'd totally do them. I'd be the meat in a GILF sandwich!
I believe you.
So you think getting an indictment is difficult, even in "liberal" eastern VA? Have you ever heard the "ham sandwich" comparison?
Dude <smh> Come up with something better.