Let me see if I have this straight, the Senate Health Care Bill

Alice in Liberaland said:
BTW are they actually cutting spending or cutting the rate of growth? There is a difference not that I would expect a dumbass like Deshtard to get it
Click to expand...

the fact that you call me desh instead of evince outs you grind


the money wont be spent which means children will die for lack of care


Instead that money wil be given to the wealthy in tax cuts


someone who makes a million will get back 50,000 dollars



that means those rich people can redo their master bath or get a bigger pool while children die for lack of care



Putin must be so proud of you
 
evince said:
the fact that you call me desh instead of evince outs you grind


the money wont be spent which means children will die for lack of care


Instead that money wil be given to the wealthy in tax cuts


someone who makes a million will get back 50,000 dollars



that means those rich people can redo their master bath or get a bigger pool while children die for lack of care



Putin must be so proud of you
Click to expand...

I am not Grind you dumb twat. Grind wishes he was as smart and good lookin as me
 
I do, in as far as it stops the bleeding that is Obamacare.

It's a discussion bill, needing all hands on deck to iron out fixes.

But the premise of not forcing someone to buy something they don't want to buy, or need.
And adding incentives for states to get involved more rather that the wholesale draining of federal funds, and allowing across state lines competition, you know that capitalism idea, is a start
 
I think what's happening now is a near-perfect reflection of the differences in priorities between the 2 parties.

Democrats look out for the most vulnerable in our society. Republicans look out for the very wealthy.
 
Thing1 said:
I think what's happening now is a near-perfect reflection of the differences in priorities between the 2 parties.

Democrats look out for the most vulnerable in our society. Republicans look out for the very wealthy.
Click to expand...

I know you want to believe that. I know that is what you tell yourselves.
 
Ralph said:
FYI: The (wink, wink) Billions being cut from the roles of "medicare" are those picked up by Obama Care....those who did not meet the qualifications for medicare in the first place. Nothing will change.... as the "20 something leeches" will go back to sucking the state dry on MEDICIAD.... Obama Care did not add the advertised 20 million new former un-insured unto the rolls....as 14 million out of the supposed 20 million qualified for mediciad before Obama Care attempted to cook the health care books. And the "new" would never meet the limited "income" limitations placed on Mediciad. That's why OBAMA CARE mandated the young to purchase (wink, wink) insurance they did not need or did not want. Any young person could go to any major health insurance carrier and purchase "catastrophic coverage" for pennies a day @ 1/10 the mandated wealth ordered under OBAMA CARE.

But once again....not taxing someone...anyone is not giving anything away as the wealth attempting to be redistributed belongs to those who EARNED IT....it belongs to them not BIG BROTHER.

Question? Just how does Big Brother pay for medicare in the first place? Answer: It does not...there is no real money in the supposed locked social security trust fund....its all based upon CREDIT and worthless government bonds that could never be paid if the tab were to be called for today...thus the 19 Trillion in debt.

There is no TAX PROBLEM to begin with as the United States Government takes in 8 Trillion dollars each year.....but there is a "progressive" SPENDING PROBLEM used to purchase the votes of socialist leeches.

Another FYI: The good people of WVa? They did overwhelming vote for Trump....why? Because they have lived through failed liberal policies that have allowed the Carpet Baggers to steal the natural resources and wealth from the state since the end of the civil war. In other words...unlike the lies and ignorant propaganda you are attempting to spread like butter on toast....the majority of the folks in rural states such as WV are blue collar workers and have informed themselves of the real facts and the need to change the status quo where the blue collar middle class working folk have been sold out by the LIBERAL ELITE big city boys who naturally think they deserve to be in power because they are so much smarter than the workers with dirt under their nails.

WVA numbers? Trump won 68% to Hillary's 26%. But I am sure your propaganda will change the minds of these hard working miners and blue collar support workers...all it takes is BS as Hillary found out....oops!
Click to expand...

Only thing missing is the right wing blog that was copied and pasted off of

Fact, it's a cut in tax for a select few and a balancing reduction in benefits for another select group, the rest of your social political babble is irrelevant
 
Alice in Liberaland said:
ROFLMAO

Poor Gayrod thinks he knows better for other people. Let them vote their interests and you vote yours.

It is ironic that you claim to vote against your interests all the time.

Do you see the irony?
No?
Click to expand...

No, the only irony is when poor redneck trash votes for Repugnant assholes who promise to gut the very same programs they depend on just because Repugnants always mouth a bunch of phony patriotic sounding rhetoric.
 
Jarod said:
ITs still the same basic format as Obamacare, It could be a lot worse, its not really a repeal.

Its simply a second generation Obamacare with less protections for poor people and a gutting of the taxes that paid for it.
Click to expand...

"IF" it were being PAID FOR.....why then was Obama Care already failing and why was it deemed mandatory under penalty of fine and or imprisonment not to purchase that which was BEING PAID FOR? The supposed TAX that was targeted to PAY FOR IT was not sufficient to actually pay for the designed failure of the program that would hopefully lead to a single payer coverage controlled in its entirely by BIG BROTHER. Face it....the liberal "wet dream" of a 100% socialized single payer system has FAILED.

What's new about this latest BIG BROTHER boondoggle? Nothing....every time the government controls anything in its entirety its grossly mismanaged and can only continue IN THE RED. Look at all the progressive social programs (from social security to headstart)....all have failures and are all over budget. Why should this latest government boondoggle be any different? All one has to do is look to history in relation to the success or failures of socialism in the Untied States of America.

Its a documented fact that all the liberal social programs that supposedly are used in the "WAR ON POVERTY" have spent over 22 Trillion US tax dollars over the past 50 years...that's over 3x the amount spent on ALL THE WARS engaged by the US MILITARY over the entire course of this nation's history. The facts are indisputable and documented by the Government's own accounting system. If you can prove any of this information to be incorrect simply debunk the Government sources provided....the most telling number as presented by the governments own data? Since the supposed declared war on poverty i.e., the Great Society programs launched in the 60s....the poverty index has remained static at 14-15% since 1967 to date...after the tax payer expenditure of inflation adjusted monies that amount to 22 TRILLION with a T....strange is the fact that the US now finds itself some 19 Trillion in debt.

While the social liberals attempt to blame the 19 trillion dollar debt on the military....the facts as presented show that the spending on SOCIALISM and its failures to win the supposed war on poverty far out pace the monies spent on national defense....as stated before....socialism has spent/wasted (with no apparent gain) more than the 19 trillion...over 3x the amount spent by this nation since its inception on national defense and warfare.

Simply debunk the sources....or not...as the truth can never be subject to refutation.

www.heritage.org/poverty-and-inequality/report/the-war-poverty-after-50-years
 
Last edited:
And it still doesn't repeal Obamacare. Nice job, fuckheads.

Who also agrees that it's time for that old piece of shit, McConnell, to curl up and die of ass cancer?
 
Jarod said:
They don't care, they wont like the result, but they wont care. That is why they are poor in the first place, they done base decisions on what will help them, they base decisions on angry emotion.
Click to expand...

We have to pass it, too see what's in it.

:evilnod:
 
look I will bottom line this for the loons.

It's not a matter of IF Obamacare is repealed, it's WHEN.
nothing more to say except it's time to try something different, the ACA didn't work, Period, keep talking all you want, it's chatter, babble and chatter
 
Nomad said:
No, the only irony is when poor redneck trash votes for Repugnant assholes who promise to gut the very same programs they depend on just because Repugnants always mouth a bunch of phony patriotic sounding rhetoric.
Click to expand...

Sadly, Obamacare providers have stopped providing, leaving millions of children dying in the streets.

Thanks, Obama
 
Alice in Liberaland said:
BTW are they actually cutting spending or cutting the rate of growth? There is a difference not that I would expect a dumbass like Deshtard to get it
Click to expand...

The liberal voting base HAS to promote this to fail; because if it becomes successful, they've lost yet another leg of support for their midterm ranting and their hopes for 2020.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top