Lesbian child molester defies judge, pays price, liberals cry "stop the hate"

Steelplate said:
I meant to you...or rather 911 on a personal level. Sexual activity does not necessarily mean molestation. Apparently these two had a relationship when both were minors....I don't consider that situation a "molestation". Statutory Rape? Yes.

When I think of a child molested, I think of a predator who stalks, selects, earns the trust of a minor and then exploits the sexually.

I don't think that's the case here...I think it was a friendship that turned into an affair. Does that make her any less guilty? No.

But I don't think she's a dangerous sexual predator.
Click to expand...

Sadly, whether she is a dangerous sexual predator or not, she will be listed in the registry as if she were.
 
Re: Lesbian child molester defies judge, pays price, liberals cry "stop the hate"

WinterBorn said:
Sadly, whether she is a dangerous sexual predator or not, she will be listed in the registry as if she were.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I know. That's the part I do not necessarily agree with.
 
Steelplate said:
I meant to you...or rather 911 on a personal level. Sexual activity does not necessarily mean molestation. Apparently these two had a relationship when both were minors....I don't consider that situation a "molestation". Statutory Rape? Yes. When I think of a child molested, I think of a predator who stalks, selects, earns the trust of a minor and then exploits the sexually. I don't think that's the case here...I think it was a friendship that turned into an affair. Does that make her any less guilty? No But I don't think she's a dangerous sexual predator.
Click to expand...

The molester in this case defied a court order by having thousands of contacts with her child victim. That's why she's back in jail and the plea deal is off the table.

But some liberals ignore her willful flouting of the law and demand that she be given a pass.

That is the issue.
 
Re: Lesbian child molester defies judge, pays price, liberals cry "stop the hate"

Agree with me said:
The molester in this case defied a court order by having thousands of contacts with her child victim. That's why she's back in jail and the plea deal is off the table.

But some liberals ignore her willful flouting of the law and demand that she be given a pass.

That is the issue.
Click to expand...

She's a young girl in love with another young girl who is in love with her. As far as giving her a pass? No....she is responsible for her actions.....I agree.

But you "black and whiters" have zero ability to.place yourself in another person's shoes, do you?
 
Steelplate said:
She's a young girl in love with another young girl who is in love with her. As far as giving her a pass? No....she is responsible for her actions.....I agree. But you "black and whiters" have zero ability to.place yourself in another person's shoes, do you?
Click to expand...

I know the law, so did the molester. I choose not to violate the law, the adult molester chose to, and now she wants spacial treatment, supported by liberals.

In fact, she tried to destroy evidence to evade the repercussions of her actions.

Her emotions have no legal standing.
 
Agree with me said:
Why is is sad?

What seems sad is the stolen childhood this offender took from her child victim.
Click to expand...

I did not say that the child was not molested. But I see a difference between levels of molestation. I think this situation and others is not the same as some adult pervert molesting numerous 8 year olds. As I said, I think she is guilty of the crime for which she is charged, but I do not see this woman as a sexual predator.
 
Steelplate said:
But those two questions still stand....and I would like you to answer them honestly.

1. When did you lose your virginity?

2. Does it really matter if your daughter loses hers to a classmate the same age, or to a 20 year old if she is 16?
Click to expand...

1. Information that I choose not to reveal, due to the harpies on here.

2. I taught all my children that engaging in such behavior, when they really don't have a clue as to the emotional involvement, is unacceptable.

All my daughters waited till they were adults and so did my son.
 
Steelplate said:
I meant to you...or rather 911 on a personal level. Sexual activity does not necessarily mean molestation. Apparently these two had a relationship when both were minors....I don't consider that situation a "molestation". Statutory Rape? Yes.

When I think of a child molested, I think of a predator who stalks, selects, earns the trust of a minor and then exploits the sexually.

I don't think that's the case here...I think it was a friendship that turned into an affair. Does that make her any less guilty? No.

But I don't think she's a dangerous sexual predator.
Click to expand...

mo·lest (m-lst)
tr.v. mo·lest·ed, mo·lest·ing, mo·lests
1. To disturb, interfere with, or annoy.
2. To subject to unwanted or improper sexual activity.

Children can not give CONSENT, period.
They can't give CONSENT to someone their own age.
They can't give CONSENT to someone a year older then they are.
They can't give CONSENT to someone 2 or 3 years older then they are.
They can't give CONSENT to an adult.

The "18 year old" was the older person in the relationship and therefore bears the brunt of the responsibility.
 
Last edited:
USFREEDOM911 said:
So you wouldn't have minded a 20 year old man, having a sexual relationship with your 16 year old daughter?
Click to expand...
Because I talk to my daughter, she's not likely to have sex with a 20 year old when she is 16. However, if she did willingly I would not want it to be a crime.
 
Socrtease said:
Because I talk to my daughter, she's not likely to have sex with a 20 year old when she is 16. However, if she did willingly I would not want it to be a crime.
Click to expand...

I certainly hope her mother has more sense then you do.
A 16 year old is still struggling with who they are and now when you throw sex into the mix, especially with someone who's much older, all that happens is that they become more confused.
Most of the time they tend to see themselves only as an object of sex and that that's what they're intended for.
 
Socrtease said:
Because I talk to my daughter, she's not likely to have sex with a 20 year old when she is 16. However, if she did willingly I would not want it to be a crime.
Click to expand...

Then don't report it to the police if it happens.

The parents of the molested child in this case felt differently, they did report it, it is a crime, and now some liberals are pretending they committed a hate crime.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Just curious; but if you think 16 and 20 are ok, what about....
15 and 19?
14 and 18?
13 and 17?
12 and 16?
11 and 15?
10 and 14?

At what point do you intend to be a man and stand for something, instead of falling for anything?
Click to expand...

States have what I think are referred to as "Romeo Laws," that fall short of statutory rape laws in severity. In New York State we have "sexual misconduct" statutes that are misdemeanors. There's no question that the ages are completely arbitrary, but state legislatures have the right to make those determinations.

On a separate matter, I think any underage girl with a baby who goes down to the welfare office to register for benefits should be sat down with a police detective, a complaint filed, and a criminal investigation launched. Ideally, I wouldn't limit it to welfare. Any birth certificate so issued should result in a criminal investigation, since there is probable cause of criminal activity.
 
Re: Lesbian child molester defies judge, pays price, liberals cry "stop the hate"

USFREEDOM911 said:
I certainly hope her mother has more sense then you do.
A 16 year old is still struggling with who they are and now when you throw sex into the mix, especially with someone who's much older, all that happens is that they become more confused.
Most of the time they tend to see themselves only as an object of sex and that that's what they're intended for.
Click to expand...

Yes...they are struggling with who they are. Sex exacerbates that struggle. Because at that age sex and love are often confused as the same thing. Even with 18 year olds.....sometimes 20 year olds, depending on their maturity.

That's why I maintain that this case isn't about some sick child predator....it's about an illegal sexual and emotional relationship. I have no issue with the older girl being punished. The law is the law....and we are all subject to the law.

But the way some of you label this girl in the same manner as a 40 year old who hangs out at playgrounds looking for victims is quite over the top.
 
Hunt violated her pretrial conditions by contacting the girl identified as the victim in the case.

Prosecutors say Hunt exchanged thousands of texts with the girl and sent her nude photos.

Prosecutors also alleged Hunt's mother, Kelly Hunt Smith, texted the alleged victim and urged her to delete "everything" so no one would find out the girl and Hunt had spoken.

Assistant State Attorney Chris Taylor said in court Tuesday that within days of the court's no contact order, Hunt began contacting the alleged victim in the case, the paper reports. The younger girl's parents reportedly found out, leading to an investigation and Tuesday's hearing.

Sheriff's Detective Jeremy Sheppard testified during the hearing about the abundance of electronic evidence obtained and told the court that Hunt and the younger girl had physical contact on July 29.

"The evidence is overwhelming," Circuit Court Judge Robert Pegg said before revoking the teen's bond.

Hunt's father has publicly claimed that the girl's parents went to police because they blamed Hunt for their child's homosexuality.

Since Hunt's arrest, the case has garnered national attention for what some say is a gay rights issue. Advocacy groups including the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida argue that older high schoolers dating their younger counterparts is an innocuous, everyday occurrence that is not prosecuted - regardless of sexual orientation - and not a crime on par with predatory sex offenses.


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_...ip-to-remain-in-jail-until-trial-judge-rules/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top