What threats? What do you think he can do?
True, it's about his farcical lies and retarded claims.
“Kimmel is back on ABC to big ratings”
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
What threats? What do you think he can do?
True, it's about his farcical lies and retarded claims.
26 million is nearly four times more Americans than watched Trump’s parade, and “grovel” is hardly what Kimmel did:
“He (Trump) tried his best to cancel me, instead, he forced millions of people to watch the show. That backfired bigly. He might have to release the Epstein files to distract us from this now.”
Another bald-faced lie. But brainless halfwit leftists like you seem to enjoy being lied to and gaslighted.
Into the Night
Verified User
I'm afraid you're right.No need to ask. The answer is an affirmative yes.
Into the Night
Verified User
Kimmel is off the air. You can't get ratings if you off the air.
Into the Night
Verified User
No, they didn't. A few did (mostly on Youtube), but Kimmel is not being carried by most of the stations affiliated with ABC. Kimmel is effectively off the national broadcasting. Only a few stations are carrying him at all.WOW!!! 26 million watched to see him grovel and just got more asinine lies.
Into the Night
Verified User
Blatant lie.
It's exactly what he did, and he did it badly. Just crocodile tears.
Trump didn't cancel Kimmel.
What show? Kimmel is off the air.
What Epstein files? Why are you idiots fixated on 'files' that don't exist?
Tbird19482
Verified User
Will Trump do anything about Watters on FOX calling for the UN to get bombed?
Probably not, He is a right winger and they can't do no wrong , can they MAGAS?
did Watter call to bomb the UN - Bing
Intelligent search from Bing makes it easier to quickly find what you’re looking for and rewards you.
Are you kidding, silly.Will Trump do anything about Watters on FOX calling for the UN to get bombed?
Probably not, He is a right winger and they can't do no wrong , can they MAGAS?
did Watter call to bomb the UN - Bing
Intelligent search from Bing makes it easier to quickly find what you’re looking for and rewards you.www.bing.com
As a somewhat side note, what is your opinion of CA's new SB 771? It seems to be a bit harsh to allow the state to pick and choose what they deem to be hate speech.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
cawacko
Well-known member
Understood about the numbers but ratings aren’t the only factor. Networks also look at cost. Kimmel’s salary compared to cheaper substitute programming matters, as do things like ad revenue, how much online engagement it gets, and how a show supports the rest of the lineup.
I know nothing about late night TV, but that's what I've picked up on reading about it.
cawacko
Well-known member
On the surface it sounds admirable 'let's stop online harm', but the devil is always in the details. This will very much be challenged on free speech grounds. The way it's written leaves a lot of discretion to the regulators, and we know how that often turns out.
tigerred59
Verified User
Back in the day, ABC under the leadership of Fred Silverman, took bold steps to showcase a little unknown called 3's Company. All the bible toting hypocrites had a fit over a gay guy living with 2 sexually provocative females and urged advertisers to pull their support....ONLY ONE COMPANY ABLIGED....SEARS. Although it took a minute, but Sears not only lost customers, they lost their fuckin company!!!“It got a large audience, nearly 6.3 million people tuned in to the broadcast alone, despite the blackouts in many cities. As is often the case with late-night hosts’ monologues, there was a larger audience online, with more than 15 million people watching Kimmel’s opening remarks on YouTube by Wednesday evening, more than 26 million people watched Kimmel’s return on social media, including YouTube.
Kimmel is back on ABC to big ratings, but some affiliates still refuse to air his show
Jimmy Kimmel offered no apologies in his return to late-night television, but said he was not trying to joke about the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.apnews.com
Without Nextstar and Sinclair, wonder how they did for the 11:30-12:30 time slot showing reruns
So explain to us then, what was the “lie”Another bald-faced lie. But brainless halfwit leftists like you seem to enjoy being lied to and gaslighted.
Or are you just modeling your Messiah, say shit, true or not, it doesn’t matter
What’s to know, it ain’t Carson or Letterman, and probably more edgy, but basically the same, monologue, and guests usually promoting something, pretty much as always. Audience isn’t what it used to be given the time period and the unlimited options people have for viewing anything. Kimmel has his own niche, quick witted, and I’d wager probably a millennial following, especially on the internet
Especially allowing the State to hane the decisions at their discretion.
cawacko
Well-known member
I guess my point behind about not knowing much about late night TV wasn’t real clear. I meant from an economic perspective in terms of the cost of production and how much additional revenue is generated beyond just the viewers watching live and how the stations value that.
Certainly not an expert, or even an amateur, but on network TV nothing is cheap, and I’d suppose with late night TV even breaking even is an accomplishment. Kimmel’s value is what he offers on digital platforms and his name recognition for ABC
Keep in mind, showing Family Feud reruns late night’s isn’t going to make any network or affiliates money, and even with the “hard way” the affiliates are going to want to keep close with Disney knowing college football and major sports events are on that Network and ESPN
Speaking of which, Illinois lost their QB this week, getting rosier for your Trojans