Killers love guns

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cancel4
  • Start date Start date
DNC's posts are much more entertaining than anyone else.....and proof positive "he swallows".....
 
The assumption that plant life is worthless while meat life is valuable is illogical. One does not know the value of a life you cannot communicate with. Just because it does not have a face does not mean it has no value.

In Wicca, the life in every animal or plant is equally valuable.

And DNC, I am not going to become a vegetarian. I am an omnivore. I am a hunter. I am a shooter. Better for me to be who I am than to try and squeeze an extra week out of my life and try to please those around me by being a herd animal.
 
DNC's posts are much more entertaining than anyone else.....and proof positive "he swallows".....

Not true, I find yellow-peril, Asshate, Watermark, Charver, and Beefy all to be much more amusing than DNC.

That said, his post about trusting Obama completely was fucking hilarious, and great satire on someone's part...
 
I would very much doubt that. Left to their own devices populations self regulate.
By permitting the slaughter of wild creatures you also allow me to hunt. Now, you might be the best shot in the world. You might be able to down an animal with a single bullet so the animal knows nothing. However, you would allow me to hunt and I have never fired a gun in my life, with the exception of an airgun at a fairground. There are probably more bad shots than good shots in America. Not really a humane method of putting meat on the table.
The desire to kill is one of man's basest desires. Outside America we understand human progression and enlightenment. We give lessons if you are interested.

What country are you from? Chances are, at some point in history the USA has saved your ass. So...we'll pass on the lessons, thank you.
 
What country are you from? Chances are, at some point in history the USA has saved your ass. So...we'll pass on the lessons, thank you.

*** crosses fingers and hopes Low replies "Vietnam" ***
 
Last edited:
Tell you what. You tell us which countries' donkeys you have saved and why and I'll tell you if you are close.


What country are you from? Chances are, at some point in history the USA has saved your ass. So...we'll pass on the lessons, thank you.
 
Nobody needs a car, either.

Look at the news. How many killings with guns will America put up with before we act? President Obama and Attorney General Holder are ready to do whatever it takes to get guns off the streets. Nobody should have a gun, nobody needs a gun.
 
True, and the Global Warming crisis would be solved if everyone was like you and me.

Cars aren't used for mass muirder, though, and guns are. We need to disarm the public now!

One battle at a time.
 
Last edited:
True, and the Global Warming crisis would be solved if everyone was like you and me.

Cars aren't used for mass muirder, though, and guns are. We need to disarm the public now!

Obe battle at a time.

Auto accidents are the leading cause of death in the USA. Auto accidents are the leading cause of work related injuries and deaths.
 
Auto accidents are the leading cause of death in the USA. Auto accidents are the leading cause of work related injuries and deaths.

And now to address auto accidents involving alcohol......does DNC want to go back to prohibition days?
 
What I and the Attorney General and millions of other concerned people want is a stop to the madness of gun violence, which is perpetrated by the myth that the second amendment gives every nutball the right to kill.
 
True, and the Global Warming crisis would be solved if everyone was like you and me.

Cars aren't used for mass muirder, though, and guns are. We need to disarm the public now!

One battle at a time.

Not used for mass murder?

What about the old guy in CA that plowed thru a crowd?
Or a drunk causing an accident that kills several?
Or a kid with no sense causing a major wreck.
 
What I and the Attorney General and millions of other concerned people want is a stop to the madness of gun violence, which is perpetrated by the myth that the second amendment gives every nutball the right to kill.

What you want is to allow sensationalistic nonsense to allow the disarming of the population.

No one has ever claimed the 2nd amendment gave us a right to kill. And those willing to kill are not going to obey any law that you and the AG write.

The only myths involved your interpretation of the 2nd amendment and that banning firearms will help.
 
What other use does a gun have if not to kill?

When gun enthusiasts talk about "freedom," they have something specific in mind—freedom from government oppression. In their view, unfettered access to firearms is the key ingredient to protecting individual rights from overreaching by government. They argue that the only way to keep centralized authority in check is to ensure that individual citizens retain the capability to confront the government with force of arms. As NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre has said, “The people have a right to take whatever measures necessary, including force, to abolish oppressive government.”

This idea, which we call “insurrectionism,” is part of a broader ideological perspective that opposes a strong, activist government in nearly all of its forms. Insurrectionist philosophy degrades the democratic values and institutions that protect all of the freedoms we enjoy as Americans. Gun lobby extremists have been perfectly willing to trample on any freedom that gets in the way of their pursuit of unrestricted private access to firearms (i.e., property rights, access to justice, freedom of information, public safety, etc.). This toxic mix of ideology and firepower has moved beyond rhetoric and resulted in real violence in our country.

http://www.csgv.org/site/c.pmL5JnO7KzE/b.3509297/k.7F98/Guns_Democracy_and_Freedom.htm
 
Tell you what. You tell us which countries' donkeys you have saved and why and I'll tell you if you are close.

All of western Europe, South Korea, Kuwait, Grenada, the Philippines, numerous other countries throughout the Pacific, Afghanistan, Iraq, and arguably the USSR. The list goes on... so what's your answer?
 
When gun enthusiasts talk about "freedom," they have something specific in mind—freedom from government oppression. In their view, unfettered access to firearms is the key ingredient to protecting individual rights from overreaching by government. They argue that the only way to keep centralized authority in check is to ensure that individual citizens retain the capability to confront the government with force of arms. As NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre has said, “The people have a right to take whatever measures necessary, including force, to abolish oppressive government.”

This idea, which we call “insurrectionism,” is part of a broader ideological perspective that opposes a strong, activist government in nearly all of its forms. Insurrectionist philosophy degrades the democratic values and institutions that protect all of the freedoms we enjoy as Americans. Gun lobby extremists have been perfectly willing to trample on any freedom that gets in the way of their pursuit of unrestricted private access to firearms (i.e., property rights, access to justice, freedom of information, public safety, etc.). This toxic mix of ideology and firepower has moved beyond rhetoric and resulted in real violence in our country.

http://www.csgv.org/site/c.pmL5JnO7KzE/b.3509297/k.7F98/Guns_Democracy_and_Freedom.htm

your first idiot problem is buying the paul helmke phrase of 'insurrectionism' hook, line, and sinker causing you to flop around like a fish instead of using what you migh have in your brain pan.

It's not insurrectionism, it's the theory of restoration. Most people who thoroughly believe in constitution, bill of rights, and especially the second amendment know full well that a central federal government is necessary, however, the constitution strictly limits the powers afforded to that central government and for good reason. The Second Amendment is not about providing a means of insurrection, for that would entail having to admit that an oppressive and tyrannical US federal government would be legitimate. At the point where it becomes overreaching and tyrannical, that federal government is no longer legitimate and is operating outside of its constitutional restrictions, therefore, those of us who retain our right to arms protected by the Second Amendment would set out to RESTORE the federal government to it's legitimacy.
 
I take it that by posting a somewhat humorous, but irrelevant, link, you have absolutely no rebuttal to my expertly articulated and well reasoned point.

you can go sit down in the corner now.
 
Back
Top