new defense for white folks..........all white juries will relate to you.
Hey Evince, ever see an all BLACK jury? if not why do you think thats is?
OJ's....
new defense for white folks..........all white juries will relate to you.
Hey Evince, ever see an all BLACK jury? if not why do you think thats is?
Point taken, but, a lot of times, tears are contrived, so I would have to be present in the courtroom to be able to get a picture of her mental state, but I still stand by my point that pulling your gun, instead of a taser is not being in control and after 25 years of service, I would expect better of her. Tears would not change that.
She'll probably get off on that charge but the question still lingers. How in the world would a police veteran confuse a taser with a real gun?
Remorse does not erase culpability. There are many people in jail who are sorry for what they have done, it doesn’t absolve them of blame.I think if you look at the video I posted in this link?
Of her right after she shot him?
You will see that her tears are almost certainly NOT contrived in the courtroom.
This woman CLEARLY felt MASSIVE remorse as soon as she realized what she had done.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-and-CRY-you-ll-get-off&p=4848519#post4848519
Naw she will get off because he was fleeing with a cop hanging in the door of his car. That could lead to serious injury or death of the cop. That justifies the use of lethal force. I'm sure she intended to taz him but she could just as easily shot him and be within her rights. The bottom line is resisting arrest is stupid.
That was not the first time that has happened.
Perhaps the question should be, "Why are cop Tazers shaped like pistols?"

That was not the first time that has happened. Perhaps the question should be, "Why are cop Tazers shaped like pistols?"
the problem is she freaked out a bit and fucked up.
Point taken, but, a lot of times, tears are contrived, so I would have to be present in the courtroom to be able to get a picture of her mental state, but I still stand by my point that pulling your gun, instead of a taser is not being in control and after 25 years of service, I would expect better of her. Tears would not change that.
That alone will probably get her off the charge. As to he lesser charge or punishment, we'll have to see.
She killed a man. Cop or not, that innocent life needs atonement. Sure, treat it like she accidentally ran over him, but a death is still a death.
They can give her the minimum (5 years? out in 2?) in minimum security, but she needs to pay the penalty as should anyone in the same situation.
Additionally, a pass for Potter, who I do sympathize with, also give the little police department and the city a pass. The City needs more cops and more training. They can have an exchange or ride along program with the Milwaukee cops for a month...and night...on weekends....just to see how rough the real world can get.
While the city skimped on training and/or qualifications, a man is now dead and a woman's career shattered by the guilt of having killed an innocent human being. It's not just about paying atonement, but making sure there are no repeat issues. The City and taxpayers of Brooklyn Center need to address this.
ThisMaybe women are too emotional to be cops.![]()
Uh uh. Says the gay boy.
![]()
Is this you?
![]()
Lack of training in dangerous situations. She obviously panicked when she saw her trainee's life endangered. According to the link below, the traffic stop wasn't necessary but it was legal and routine as training for for her trainee.She'll probably get off on that charge but the question still lingers. How in the world would a police veteran confuse a taser with a real gun?
No, but a male gay cop is more cut out for the job than a woman. There is a physical and mental difference between men and women. Sorry to burst your bubble.
I'm female. Women are not cut out for some jobs, cops is one of them.