She took advantage of drunk me at a party 32 years ago!
I remember that!!!
She took advantage of drunk me at a party 32 years ago!
So last year she was confirmed with bi partisan support to the second highest court in the land, now she is a radical?
But confirming a drunken rapist white guy is just Honky dory with you
Righties are so upset that she seems so much smarter than the beer guy....
HORSE SHIT. THEY STOP LAWS THAT ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL, AS THEY TAKE A VOW TO DO.
did you drink beer in high school? I poured it down my throat by the gallon
I guess that makes me a gang rapist?
How many people raped by priests remember those details about their abuse?
That made no sense at all. Discuss Roberts court opening up dark money in political campaigns. They wrecked the campaign financing laws to favor the rich and powerful. They allowed southern strategies and gerrymandering to flourish. They helped states pick who can vote. The court reached past the cases and changed the standards. You should take a vow not to post stupidly, but it would be meaningless. Your right wing slant poisons you and it poisons our right wing supreme too.
Proof?
Take it up with Congress. She did apply them as directed. You don't want her on the court so you'll make up any excuse to trash her, at least be honest about it. Read the link, it's short.
"Requires the court to impose a sentence within the range set forth by the Commission, if one has been issued, unless aggravating or mitigating circumstances exist that were not adequately considered by the Commission in formulating the guidelines. Requires the court to state in open court at the time of sentencing the reason for imposing a sentence at a point within the prescribed range, or the specific reason for imposing a sentence outside of such range."
https://www.congress.gov/bill/98th-congress/house-bill/5773
How would your kids know? Not all who have kiddie porn are acting on it. But because you judge them badly, they should have long .long sentences. The point is that many are being overly sentenced. You are wise to judge them by behavior.
They wouldn't...until they had a bad experience. Then it's too late. Do a through pre-sentence investigation. What and how many articles on the puter.
You see, I have little compassion for pedophiles. I think they should be hung in public.
As should rapists, don't you agree?
She handed out much lower sentences than recommended, is sex offense cases, for some odd reason...."PROOF" was in the hearings. Did you not watch?
She can't answer the question what a woman is. What's your answer?
This is my answer because I follow the science, not RW prejudices.
"There isn't one single 'biological' answer to the definition of a woman. There's not even a singular biological answer to the question of 'what is a female,'" Jordan-Young said.
There are at least six different biological markers of “sex” in the body: genitals, chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive structures, hormone ratios and secondary sex characteristics. None of the six is strictly dichotomous, Jordan-Young said, and the different markers don’t always align."
So, you don't know what a woman is either?
![]()
What are you? Should I wonder too?
?????????????????????????????????????? How completely fucked in the head are you? I mean seriously. You have zero idea what the SC actually does. None. A typical democrat. Dumb as fuck. At least learn the basics you uneducated idiot.