Ketanji Brown Jackson is the most popular Supreme Court nominee in years

So last year she was confirmed with bi partisan support to the second highest court in the land, now she is a radical? :palm:

But confirming a drunken rapist white guy is just Honky dory with you

YOU MEAN THE BRILLIANT JURIST YOU AND YOURS LINED UP PAID LIARS TO DEFAME? HIM?

WHO THE FUCK DID HE "RAPE"?


2j21qw.jpg



2jztxp.jpg



Kav-Avenatti.png
 

HORSE SHIT. THEY STOP LAWS THAT ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL, AS THEY TAKE A VOW TO DO.

That made no sense at all. Discuss Roberts court opening up dark money in political campaigns. They wrecked the campaign financing laws to favor the rich and powerful. They allowed southern strategies and gerrymandering to flourish. They helped states pick who can vote. The court reached past the cases and changed the standards. You should take a vow not to post stupidly, but it would be meaningless. Your right wing slant poisons you and it poisons our right wing supreme too.
 
That made no sense at all. Discuss Roberts court opening up dark money in political campaigns. They wrecked the campaign financing laws to favor the rich and powerful. They allowed southern strategies and gerrymandering to flourish. They helped states pick who can vote. The court reached past the cases and changed the standards. You should take a vow not to post stupidly, but it would be meaningless. Your right wing slant poisons you and it poisons our right wing supreme too.

?????????????????????????????????????? How completely fucked in the head are you? I mean seriously. You have zero idea what the SC actually does. None. A typical democrat. Dumb as fuck. At least learn the basics you uneducated idiot.
 
:palm: Take it up with Congress. She did apply them as directed. You don't want her on the court so you'll make up any excuse to trash her, at least be honest about it. Read the link, it's short.

"Requires the court to impose a sentence within the range set forth by the Commission, if one has been issued, unless aggravating or mitigating circumstances exist that were not adequately considered by the Commission in formulating the guidelines. Requires the court to state in open court at the time of sentencing the reason for imposing a sentence at a point within the prescribed range, or the specific reason for imposing a sentence outside of such range."

https://www.congress.gov/bill/98th-congress/house-bill/5773

She can't answer the question what a woman is. What's your answer?
 
How would your kids know? Not all who have kiddie porn are acting on it. But because you judge them badly, they should have long .long sentences. The point is that many are being overly sentenced. You are wise to judge them by behavior.

They wouldn't...until they had a bad experience. Then it's too late. Do a through pre-sentence investigation. What and how many articles on the puter.

You see, I have little compassion for pedophiles. I think they should be hung in public.
 
They wouldn't...until they had a bad experience. Then it's too late. Do a through pre-sentence investigation. What and how many articles on the puter.

You see, I have little compassion for pedophiles. I think they should be hung in public.

As should rapists, don't you agree?
 
She handed out much lower sentences than recommended, is sex offense cases, for some odd reason...."PROOF" was in the hearings. Did you not watch?

I don't believe that's true. Some were higher, some were average and some were lower. But you go right ahead and pick on her, rather than acknowledge the truth about sentencing by many republican-approved judges.

WASHINGTON — Several Republican senators repeatedly and misleadingly suggested during this week’s Supreme Court confirmation hearings that Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson had given uncommonly lenient sentences to felons convicted of child sex abuse crimes.

But all of the Republican critics had previously voted to confirm judges who had given out prison terms below prosecutor recommendations, the very bar they accused Jackson of failing to clear.


Just 30% of offenders who possessed or shared images of child sex abuse received a sentence within the range suggested by nonbinding federal guidelines in the 2019 fiscal year, and 59% received a sentence below the guideline range. And in general, it is not uncommon for judges to impose shorter sentences than what prosecutors have recommended...

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/nation-world/story/2022-03-25/critics-of-jacksons-child-sex-abuse-sentences-backed-judges-with-similar-records
 
She can't answer the question what a woman is. What's your answer?

This is my answer because I follow the science, not RW prejudices.

"There isn't one single 'biological' answer to the definition of a woman. There's not even a singular biological answer to the question of 'what is a female,'" Jordan-Young said.

There are at least six different biological markers of “sex” in the body: genitals, chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive structures, hormone ratios and secondary sex characteristics. None of the six is strictly dichotomous, Jordan-Young said, and the different markers don’t always align."
 
This is my answer because I follow the science, not RW prejudices.

"There isn't one single 'biological' answer to the definition of a woman. There's not even a singular biological answer to the question of 'what is a female,'" Jordan-Young said.

There are at least six different biological markers of “sex” in the body: genitals, chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive structures, hormone ratios and secondary sex characteristics. None of the six is strictly dichotomous, Jordan-Young said, and the different markers don’t always align."

So, you don't know what a woman is either?

giphy.webp


What are you? Should I wonder too?
 
?????????????????????????????????????? How completely fucked in the head are you? I mean seriously. You have zero idea what the SC actually does. None. A typical democrat. Dumb as fuck. At least learn the basics you uneducated idiot.

You have never made a post of value, ever added useful information or brought insight . You are stubbornly and proudly ignorant.
 
Back
Top