Keith Olbermann's Greatness

Status
Not open for further replies.
Where am I trying to change the meaning Care? I am outlining it as it is ... direct from the Constitution that our Forefathers laid out.., and no .. just because you are an extreme left winger it does not give you and Desh some special enlightment ... lets get this straight. We are a Country made up of different people with diffferent ideals ... a big tent Country!
And I am offended that you think that I am part of some sinister fascist Idealism... :mad:

I went to military schools for a great part of my education and was taught by these CONSERVATIVE military schools that we live in a Democracy, with a Democratic Republic as our form of government....

In your tiny interpretation.... the whole western world does not live in democracy....with freedom, including the freedom to choose what form of democracy they want...?

Democracy:


Main varieties include:

Direct

Direct democracy is a political system where the people vote on government decisions, such as questions of whether to approve or reject various laws. It is called direct because the power of making decisions is exercised by the people directly, without intermediaries or representatives. Historically, this form of government has been rare because of the difficulties of getting all the people of a certain territory in one place for the purpose of voting. All direct democracies to date have been relatively small communities; usually city-states. The most notable was the ancient Athenian democracy. Today, direct democracy is existing in countries such as Switzerland, where certain cantons practice it in its literal form, and in other countries, typically those where there is also referendum.

Representative

Representative democracy (or Polyarchy[1]) is so named because the people do not vote on most government decisions directly, but select representatives to a governing body or assembly. Representatives may be chosen by the electorate as a whole (as in many proportional systems) or represent a particular subset (usually a geographic district or constituency), with some systems using a combination of the two. Many representative democracies incorporate some elements of direct democracy, such as referenda.


Liberal

Liberal democracy is a representative democracy which has free and fair elections, and also has rule of law, a separation of powers, and protection of liberties (thus the name liberal) of speech, assembly, religion, and property. [3] [4] Conversely, an illiberal democracy is one where the protections that form a liberal democracy are either nonexistant, or not enforced. The experience in some post-Soviet states drew attention to the phenomenon, although it is not of recent origin. Napoleon for example used plebiscites to ratify his decisions.
 
I loved Olberman on ESPN. When he got tempermental and left I was not happy with him or the ESPN powers that were. Now I like to watch his show, but I watch it realizing that it has a definite leftist slant, just like O'Reilly has a rightist slant. As long as we know what we are watching they are both entertaining shows.

As to the "facism" thing, I think we all know the term is used to invoke an emotionally charged response to help the president build support for his "war on terror." Will it work? Time will tell. I do know that we are going to have to do something about the ME/Iran situation.
 
Wow, he really was good here. I usually think of him as being very funy, but this was actually very powerful. I don't understand when these bags of shit are going to wake up and realize that when they speak of people against the war in these terms, that they are now speaking of a majority of Americans?

Here's the link again , because on this board, you just paste the address and it makes the link for you. You can't use HTML, which makes you wonder, will we soon be like those old geezers who complain that "the kids today can't count change back?" Because the "new" cash registers figure it for you...someday soon no one under a certain age will know how to create a link, because all over the net, sites will do it for them. And we will all sit around, shake our heads and say "In my time". You'll see

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/...delivers-one-hell-of-a-commentary-on-rumsfeld


Ahh the youth :)
I was on the net before HTML and browsers.......
 
Question:

Does Olberman write his own shit?

That speech was a work of art. In terms of rhetoric, content, and delivery. It was frickin' brilliant. As good, or better, than the best shit a presidential speechwriter can come up with.

Frankly, if it is written by Olbermna, I'm astonded by his talent for rhetoric.
 
Olberman ?
Never watched the guy. Must be a hype and spinner. I avoid those and just try and get the news and make up my own mind.
 
Oberman writes his own stuff and reports things others avoid even though its bonafide news.

He funny and knows when to be serious.

He is a must watch newscaster no matter what side your on because he gives it like it is and hates fake news.

They make him report it so he does funny shit shit it like puppet theater treating it like the Crap it is.

When its time to get serious he rises to the level and always delievers
 
hey desh, are you going to apologize to Rove for accusing him on leaking Palmes name? Remember all those post you made putting him in prison?
 
hey desh, are you going to apologize to Rove for accusing him on leaking Palmes name? Remember all those post you made putting him in prison?


He did leak her name and discuss her position...

And from what I have read, Scooter libby did such leaking with Judith Miller of the NYT, prior to the party that novak was at, where Armitage mentioned it.

and Rove CONFIRMED IT readily and proceded to pass the plame classified info along to over 5 different journalists.

And as I said, scooter libby passed this info on before the novak article....and then he proceeded to LIE BEFORE OATH and OBSTRUCT JUSTICE....

Why do you think HE LIED toby, Huh? I'd love to hear your reason....

care

We all KNEW that there was a third "leaker" and pretty much we had all heard that it was Armitage...but this has nothing to do with the tea in China...
 
Sorry Care I just wanted Desh to respond to a different thread, the ROVE thread. But she will ignore it.
 
Are we to expect anything less form Keith Oberman? That was nothing but a bashfest on the Bush adm. They guy is so far left he can't see straight. I found ironic that he talked about England's government ignoring Hitler's threat but yet,the Liberals like Keith,are doing the exact same thing to Bush in regards to threats we face today.

That show has got to be the worst show on cable news. I believe his ratings reflect that. It's a bit immature for a news show IMO.
 
Obermanns convoluted reasoning was astonishing.....how he turned the appessers of Chamberlain into the Bush admin. was to say white is black and black is white....Lberals truely eat shit...the shit coming from the likes of Mr. Obermann....we see on a daily basis who the appessers of terrorism in the US are....and ANYBODY with even a partially functioning brain knows its not the Bush admin....
 
Olberman is typical lib. distort the facts and just make the crap up as he goes along. He should be on the Comedy Channel and not the new channel.
 
but I do enjoy is obsession with O'Reily...because he can't attack the content, he attacks the person.....how typical, as proven on these political boards....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top