Justice Dept. Submits Redacted Affidavit Used in Trump Search Warrant

B

BidenPresident

Verified User
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department on Thursday proposed extensive redactions to the affidavit used to obtain a search warrant for former President Donald J. Trump’s Florida residence in an effort to shield witnesses from intimidation or retribution if it is made public, officials said.

The filing, sent to a federal judge in Florida a few minutes before a noon deadline, is unlikely to lead to the immediate release of the affidavit.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/25/us/politics/trump-justice-dept-affidavit.html
 
BidenPresident said:
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department on Thursday proposed extensive redactions to the affidavit used to obtain a search warrant for former President Donald J. Trump’s Florida residence in an effort to shield witnesses from intimidation or retribution if it is made public, officials said.

The filing, sent to a federal judge in Florida a few minutes before a noon deadline, is unlikely to lead to the immediate release of the affidavit.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/25/us/politics/trump-justice-dept-affidavit.html
Click to expand...

So basically an affidavit that reveals nothing. Can't wait.
 
BidenPresident said:
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department on Thursday proposed extensive redactions to the affidavit used to obtain a search warrant for former President Donald J. Trump’s Florida residence in an effort to shield witnesses from intimidation or retribution if it is made public, officials said.

The filing, sent to a federal judge in Florida a few minutes before a noon deadline, is unlikely to lead to the immediate release of the affidavit.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/25/us/politics/trump-justice-dept-affidavit.html
Click to expand...

Remembering back you were the FIRST to screech that Trrump should turn ovr the documents. Garland bluffed and Trump literally trumped his bluff by agreeing that they should be fully made public. NOE is is Garland panicking and coming up with feeble excuses as to why they should remain sealed.
Which way do you want it now moron?
 
U.S. Justice Dept. gives judge redacted Trump search affidavit under seal

Reinhart is expected to review the department's proposed redactions and decide whether to release the affidavit - a sworn statement outlining the evidence that gave it probable cause to seek a search warrant - and in what form. Even if it is unsealed, Reinhart has said the redactions could be so extensive they would "render the document devoid of content."

https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-ju...trump-search-affidavit-under-seal-2022-08-25/
 
Lionfish said:
Remembering back you were the FIRST to screech that Trrump should turn ovr the documents. Garland bluffed and Trump literally trumped his bluff by agreeing that they should be fully made public. NOE is is Garland panicking and coming up with feeble excuses as to why they should remain sealed.
Which way do you want it now moron?
Click to expand...

Trump would never allow these documents to be made public. They would show exactly the type and amount of stolen secrets he kept in his basement. To that you can add the video of the search which Trump has never made public.
 
Yakuda said:
So basically an affidavit that reveals nothing. Can't wait.
Click to expand...

Do you want the world to actually see the type of national security documents Trump kept laying around so carelessly. Or are you more interested in the names of the people involved?
 
floridafan said:
Do you want the world to actually see the type of national security documents Trump kept laying around so carelessly. Or are you more interested in the names of the people involved?
Click to expand...

I want to see both. Unlike you I want to get to the bottom of things. You don't. It's much better to have smoke and mirrors than facts isn't that right? Im for putting all the cards on the table. How about you? This redacting shit is for the birds.
 
Yakuda said:
I want to see both. Unlike you I want to get to the bottom of things. You don't. It's much better to have smoke and mirrors than facts isn't that right? Im for putting all the cards on the table. How about you? This redacting shit is for the birds.
Click to expand...

You are gonna see what the judge allows you to see. If trump admitted that he stole national security documents, as he has, you would just make more excuses for him.
Why in the world would you want to know the people involved in the search? Its not like you would know any of them.
 
floridafan said:
You are gonna see what the judge allows you to see. If trump admitted that he stole national security documents, as he has, you would just make more excuses for him.
Why in the world would you want to know the people involved in the search? Its not like you would know any of them.
Click to expand...

Are you mentally damaged? Seriously. Have you had some kind of head injury? First if he admitted he stole "security documents" then arrest him. Why the fuck are you waiting? Next I want to know who is involved because taxpayer money is being used for this bullshit and I think we're entitled to some fucking accountability. Honest to God I swear you're a retard.
 
Yakuda said:
Are you mentally damaged? Seriously. Have you had some kind of head injury? First if he admitted he stole "security documents" then arrest him. Why the fuck are you waiting? Next I want to know who is involved because taxpayer money is being used for this bullshit and I think we're entitled to some fucking accountability. Honest to God I swear you're a retard.
Click to expand...

You know exactly why you want those names, and it has nothing to do with the use of taxpayer money, my dear.
 
Lionfish said:
Remembering back you were the FIRST to screech that Trrump should turn ovr the documents. Garland bluffed and Trump literally trumped his bluff by agreeing that they should be fully made public. NOE is is Garland panicking and coming up with feeble excuses as to why they should remain sealed.
Which way do you want it now moron?
Click to expand...
Affadavits used to procure warrants are never released pre trial. Why should they be?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top