Gosh, I coulda sworn we spend days and days counting chads in 2000. Then we spent 2 years debating whether the Democrat actually prevailed there. Funny that would happen in a majority Republican state. When I made the comment, it was in relation to the US Congress, not the Florida legislature. The state legislature has absolutely nothing to do with what the US House votes on, or why/how they vote. I know for a fact, one Florida Senator is Republican and one is Democrat. I am not sure of the US House makeup, I think it's majority Democrat, but I could be wrong... it's certainly not ALL Republican or ALL Democrat, that would be very unusual in a state so evenly divided.
When some idiot makes the statement that the US House took action based on "the people of Florida" it should be pointed out, the "people of Florida" aren't all Democrats who oppose Republican initiatives, and they don't have any say in what the US House does or doesn't do.
I can do the same idiotic and juvenile thing you are doing, and twist your words out of context and application to mean whatever the fuck I say they mean, but I avoid doing this, primarily because I don't need or want to, and see no relevant purpose in doing it. I completely understand why you have to construct the illusion that I am always wrong, I just don't understand why you are so afraid of me, that you have to resort to this. Apparently, you don't have much faith in your ideas, or you can't articulate your points on an intellectual level, so you have to try to destroy my credibility, it's the only possible way for you to prevail. Contrary to your thinking that this sort of tactic intimidates me or dissuades me in any way, it actually gives me motivation and confidence that I have made valid points you can't refute.