The hospital disagrees with you, Wally.
Then present the hospital blood tests in court. So far what has been presented in court is that the blood tested negative for drugs.
Seriously, there was a field sobriety test, basic balance stuff, which he failed slightly. That is not a surprise, he had just been in an accident. The blood was taken, and then tested later. The tests all came up negative. The hospital did not test the blood. There are few instant tests for blood, and those that are would not be completely accurate. The prosecutor had the suspect in custody, so was willing to take his time and test it well.
It was tested as completely as modern science can, no drugs or alcohol.
Nope. The work order is issued by the shadow company, Wally. The US government issues visas, not work permits.
Work permits are issued by the US Government. It is often part of the visa issue. For instance, a permanent work permit for a non citizen, is generally called a Green Card, and is issued by... You guessed it... The US GOVERNMENT.
If companies were allowed to decide who got working papers, they would give working papers to everyone.
No, Wally. People have livers.
After the blood is drawn, it has no connection to the liver. It sits in a vial, and is tested later. Unless the driver figured out some way to get his liver into the vial...
The hospital found a depressant in his system, Wally.
allegedly failed a field sobriety test, with officers citing classic symptoms of central nervous system depressant use — bloodshot eyes, mumbled speech, and swaying.
Not the hospital, but police officers. All symptoms could be signs of a concussion, or having just been in a severe car accident. It of course made sense to take blood, for future testing. Those tests came back negative for any drugs or alcohol.
So again, the whole case is shot. Posters here are left with "maybe... maybe... maybe", but prosecutors need far more than "maybe." They need a whole new theory of a crime, and then evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to support that evidence. Given that their previous theory of a crime fell apart in court, it is not looking good.
My question is why haven't they arrested the driver who caused the accident? They claim the truck driver failed to prevent the accident, because of drug use. There is no drug use, so why not arrest the other driver who caused the accident?