Judge SLASHES Bond from $1.2 Million to $7,000 for Foreign Trucker Who Killed 5 Including a Baby in Fiery Austin Crash

[Uncensored2008]

You just proved you are an idiot because you didn't cite anything that shows that anyone was held for months without an attorney or held for months without an indictment.

Other than the three links provided.

But you have your party and the dream of world dictatorship under the Globalist Oligarchy - that leaves you no room for integrity.

Your first link is nonsense since all that is required is that a defendant is given access to all the evidence and in all cases they were. Complaining about how some video wasn't made public when they wanted it to is nothing but RW bullshit that has nothing to do with due process. The article cites the lawyers of the defendants. That would not occur if the defendants didn't have a lawyer.

ROFL

If anyone wonders how Concentration camps came about, they need only read your post.

Your second link only says the violent criminals can be held without bond since it was only the most violent criminals from Jan 6 that were not granted bond. Are you saying violent criminals should all be let of jail before trial?

Your third link says that some defendants were kept in solitary confinement to protect the from the prison's general population.

No, none of your links showed anyone being held without access to lawyers or held for months without an indictment.

A thousand plus political prisoners were held without bond for varying amounts of time, as Garland and his thugs worked to break them down. The goons using an "isolate and torture" methodology to coerce "confessions" in the same way Torquemada did. The "confessions" were then used to persecute other victims.

Civil rights died under Garland and his vile inquisition.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

I notice there are no sources, not that you would ever lie. It just that you libtards scream sources like little bitches so why not, Sources?? links?? LOL

This is what Grok just told me when I asked if the information it gave me earlier was correct.
Grok:
"I gave you the wrong information about Ronald Sandlin’s timeline because I misinterpreted the duration of his restricted attorney access, stating 18 months when his initial complaints were only 62 days after arrest, per The Guardian, NPR. I relied on Politico’s broader reporting about detention conditions lasting into mid-2022, but failed to clarify the initial delay period, causing the error."

I posted the info exactly as I got it, not to trick your pea-sized brain, genius. You'll act like you’ve never posted an incorrect source, but let’s be real, that’s practically your daily bread as a card-carrying progressive drone. And you, my friend, are the cream of the clueless crop, a real standout in the herd of bleating lefties. I saw a reply, asked Grok a question, and Grok flubbed it, big whoop, it happens. The real question is, can you handle it, or will you melt down completely? If you’re itching to debate whether you’re dumber than the average doorknob, I’m ready to school you. Want to argue why you’re a textbook mindless drone, I’m all in. Or if you’d rather spar over whether there’s any hope of curing your progressive affliction, I’m game, pick your poison, champ. LOL Dicky the Dumbass Drone, it's got a nice ring to it.

It seems google is hard for you since you have to rely on GROK. Try doing your own research. It isn't that hard to find the entire court docket for them.

Loading…

www.courtlistener.com

Loading…

www.courtlistener.com

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Other than the three links provided.

Your three links didn't show anyone was held for months without an indictment or held for months without an attorney. Quote the part of your links that you feel shows that.

But you have your party and the dream of world dictatorship under the Globalist Oligarchy - that leaves you no room for integrity.

You have your delusions.

ROFL

If anyone wonders how Concentration camps came about, they need only read your post.




A thousand plus political prisoners were held without bond for varying amounts of time, as Garland and his thugs worked to break them down. The goons using an "isolate and torture" methodology to coerce "confessions" in the same way Torquemada did. The "confessions" were then used to persecute other victims.

Civil rights died under Garland and his vile inquisition.

ROFLMAO.. Now your delusions are only getting more delusional. The number of people that were not given bond or were unable to make bail was less than 100.

 

[Into the Night]

This never happened in America.

Blatant lie (denial).

No one was held for months without counsel.

Blatant lie (denial). People who never committed any crime were arrested and held for months without counsel or trial.

Your fantasy world doesn't seem to actually exist.

Not a fantasy world, idiot. It happened.

I have asked before, name one person held for months without an indictment. The only name anyone could come up with was held for 45 days before the indictment came from a grand jury. They had a lawyer prior to that indictment because their lawyer filed a motion with the court prior to the indictment.

There was no grand jury.
Some were held for four years without any trial.

 

[Into the Night]

It seems google is hard for you since you have to rely on GROK. Try doing your own research. It isn't that hard to find the entire court docket for them.

Loading…

www.courtlistener.com

Loading…

www.courtlistener.com

Special pleading fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Your three links didn't show anyone was held for months without an indictment or held for months without an attorney. Quote the part of your links that you feel shows that.

He already did. RQAA.

You have your delusions.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Mantra 1d. Lame.

ROFLMAO.. Now your delusions are only getting more delusional. The number of people that were not given bond or were unable to make bail was less than 100.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Paradox. Irrational.

 

[Phantasmal]

And the truck driver came from Texas. Which is also a land rife with government corruption. I am seeing no connection to Mexico.

Rife!

 

[Into the Night]

I never said it required going to school.

Never said you did.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

He already did. RQAA.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Mantra 1d. Lame.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Paradox. Irrational.

Into the Night to English translation -

Into the Night - RQAA
English - "I'm too stupid to make any valid argument so I will pretend I already did."

Into the Night - "Argument of the Stone fallacy"
English - "I'm too stupid to make any valid argument."

Into the Night -"Mantra 1d"
English - "I'm too stupid to make any valid argument."

Into the Night - "Paradox. Irrational."
English - "I'm too stupid to make any valid argument."

 

[Into the Night]

LOL... And the gullible toddler makes silly claims...

Sandlin was arrested on Jan 28th, 2021. On Feb 2nd, 2021 his lawyer filed notice of appearance. He was indicted on Feb 5th 2021. He made the alleged complaints about mental torture and solitary confinement in early April 2021. It seems time means nothing to you. Jan to April is not 18 months. It isn't even 3 months.
Sandlin was not held months without an indictment. He was held 8 days before the indictment. 62 days is not 18 months.
Sandlin was not held for months without an attorney.

Sandlin was held for months without an attorney. He didn't even break any law.

Edward Lang was arrested on Jan 16, 2021. He was indicted on Jan 29th, 2021. Lang was given court appointed counsel during his first court appearance on Feb 9th, 2021. He was not held for months without an indictment. Lang was indicted for attacking police officers with a dangerous weapon.
Lang was not held for months without an indictment.
Lang was not held for months without an attorney.

He did not attack any police officer. He was held for months without his attorney. He also broke no law.

 

[Into the Night]

You just proved you are an idiot because you didn't cite anything that shows that anyone was held for months without an attorney or held for months without an indictment.

Your first link is nonsense since all that is required is that a defendant is given access to all the evidence and in all cases they were. Complaining about how some video wasn't made public when they wanted it to is nothing but RW bullshit that has nothing to do with due process. The article cites the lawyers of the defendants. That would not occur if the defendants didn't have a lawyer.

Your second link only says the violent criminals can be held without bond since it was only the most violent criminals from Jan 6 that were not granted bond. Are you saying violent criminals should all be let of jail before trial?

Your third link says that some defendants were kept in solitary confinement to protect the from the prison's general population.

No, none of your links showed anyone being held without access to lawyers or held for months without an indictment.

Yet they were held for months without access to lawyers.
They broke no law. They are not criminals.

Meanwhile, the violent Democrats rioting in Jan 6th faced NO jail time and were not even arrested.
Meanwhile, a 'security' officer murdered a protester, and has also not faced any jail time.

 

[Into the Night]

Into the Night to English translation -

Into the Night - RQAA
English - "I'm too stupid to make any valid argument so I will pretend I already did."

Into the Night - "Argument of the Stone fallacy"
English - "I'm too stupid to make any valid argument."

Into the Night -"Mantra 1d"
English - "I'm too stupid to make any valid argument."

Into the Night - "Paradox. Irrational."
English - "I'm too stupid to make any valid argument."

Redefinition fallacies. You can't change the fallacies you have committed or blame them on me or anybody else.

 

[Tobytone]

It seems google is hard for you since you have to rely on GROK. Try doing your own research. It isn't that hard to find the entire court docket for them.

Loading…

www.courtlistener.com

Loading…

www.courtlistener.com

Dicky, it was a side issue to the original post. I didn’t put much effort into it because it’s a tired subject. When I got that response from Grok, I’ll admit I was surprised, I hadn’t heard of that length of time with a lawyer before. But honestly, I didn’t care enough to dig deeper.

I’m fine with Google, I appreciate your concern, just couldn’t be bothered. It’s like when you clueless libtards constantly post articles that's debunked in two minutes, you act like you can’t find the takedown. Hilarious. Anyway, thanks for your concern, it’s noted and ignored.

 

[Into the Night]

Dicky, it was a side issue to the original post. I didn’t put much effort into it because it’s a tired subject. When I got that response from Grok, I’ll admit I was surprised, I hadn’t heard of that length of time with a lawyer before. But honestly, I didn’t care enough to dig deeper.

I’m fine with Google, I appreciate your concern, just couldn’t be bothered. It’s like when you clueless libtards constantly post articles that's debunked in two minutes, you act like you can’t find the takedown. Hilarious. Anyway, thanks for your concern, it’s noted and ignored.

Grok, Google, DuckDuckGo, ChatGPT, it's all the same. It's just browsing the web in different ways.
Poorboy is trying to make a difference out of nothing, even going so far as to claim Grok is automatically False, and Google is automatically True...even though they are the same websites!

A truly weird way to Stone your argument (cast it aside without counterargument).

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Dicky, it was a side issue to the original post. I didn’t put much effort into it because it’s a tired subject. When I got that response from Grok, I’ll admit I was surprised, I hadn’t heard of that length of time with a lawyer before. But honestly, I didn’t care enough to dig deeper.

I’m fine with Google, I appreciate your concern, just couldn’t be bothered. It’s like when you clueless libtards constantly post articles that's debunked in two minutes, you act like you can’t find the takedown. Hilarious. Anyway, thanks for your concern, it’s noted and ignored.

The court docket shows when the person's lawyer is introduced to the court. In both of those cases, the person had a lawyer in less than 30 days from their arrest. The claim that they were held for months without a lawyer is false.

 

[Into the Night]

The court docket shows when the person's lawyer is introduced to the court. In both of those cases, the person had a lawyer in less than 30 days from their arrest. The claim that they were held for months without a lawyer is false.

A public defender is not a defense lawyer. He's just filler, hired by the same State that prosecutes.

BOTH were denied defense lawyers.

 

[Tobytone]

The court docket shows when the person's lawyer is introduced to the court. In both of those cases, the person had a lawyer in less than 30 days from their arrest. The claim that they were held for months without a lawyer is false.

Hey Dicky, you're beating a dead horse. Are you stuck in a loop? I'm aware. Did I dispute that??

 

[Walt]

Mexico IS in America, Wally.

It is in the Americas, but not in America. If Mexico was part of America, it would be illegal to block people from crossing the border.

 

[Walt]

A public defender is not a defense lawyer. He's just filler, hired by the same State that prosecutes.

BOTH were denied defense lawyers.

A public defender is a defense lawyer hired by the state.

There are no public defenders in the federal system. Instead, they have court appointed lawyers. No one in a criminal court gets denied a defense attorney. Doing that would be a violation of your fifth amendment rights, and would scuttle the entire case.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

A public defender is a defense lawyer hired by the state.

You left out the word "pretend."

There are no public defenders in the federal system. Instead, they have court appointed lawyers. No one in a criminal court gets denied a defense attorney. Doing that would be a violation of your fifth amendment rights, and would scuttle the entire case.

But, you'd be better off in many cases not having one than a pubic pretender or the equivalent.