Again. You are determined to prove you are an idiot or illiterate. The story says no drugs or alcohol in his system and he had a work permit allowing him to work in the US.
Judge SLASHES Bond from $1.2 Million to $7,000 for Foreign Trucker Who Killed 5 Including a Baby in Fiery Austin Crash
- Thread starter volsrocks
- Start date
You are using a brain that doesn't show up in the tests.
Text Drivers are Killers
Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
I've read like 5 articles on this and none of them give the name of corrupt judge who cut bond to 7K. Anyone catch the name?
So he has a odd name, and black skin... But did not cause a car accident... Shouldn't he be released?
He tested negative for drugs and alcohol, so not a problem.
He is a US citizen, so not a problem.
Again, he is a US citizen, so not an illegal alien. He did not cause the accident. You are completely lost.
He was using some sort of magical drug that left no evidence? How can you prove that?
Truck drivers are randomly drug tested. You can lose your license even if you have a prescription for what is found.
Speaking of illiterate idiots, you pass with flying colors. I worked at a large trucking hub and there were quite a few
drivers (mostly from California and Colorado) who couldn't speak English. That is a scary thought when traveling on
interstates when the truck drivers can't read the road signs. Whether this driver could speak English is speculative.
Keep in mind, the driver is responsible for going over his truck and trailer. If anything is found not up to operating
condition (air leaks, worn out tires, etc.), he is toast.
Walt claims this driver was a US citizen. Are you lying? Or is Walt?
Nice pivot from your false argument that he was drunk.
He was not drunk or on drugs and he was not in the country illegally.
This was a multi-car pileup. The driver was originally charged because the police said he failed a field sobriety test. Then when they did a blood test there was no evidence of any drugs or alcohol so the charges of driving under the influence and causing a death while driving under the influence were no longer valid. Because there was no crime of that type that could be proven let alone even charged the judge reduced his bail based on whatever lesser charge he was still charged with.
You would have all the answers and would stop making yourself look like a fool if you bothered to read the actual article. But I realize it is more than one paragraph long and likely includes words that are difficult for you to understand with your limited English.
Last edited: