Judge rules Documents aren’t Trumps!

No he doesn't. Once again, you prove what a complete fucking moron you are. The Presidential Records Act defines what Presidential records are. Did you think security clearance gave you a free pass to steal classified documents? I sure hope you don't have any kind of clearance. You are too fucking stupid to be trusted with anything.

No such law.
 
That wasn't even a judge. Dumbass assface.

There was...sort of. Biden ordered the raid, told the FBI to file the affidavit (committing perjury in the process), and pressured the judge to approve it.
So you are right...sort of. It wasn't an independent judge, but a political hack.
 
Yeah, you didn't read the link I posted. Remain ignorant, doesn't bother me in the least! The judge that granted a Special Master is the guy that signed off on that warrant's boss.
He's not even a actual judge, doesn't even do criminal court, and what the FBI did is shifty AF.
ws1V4Ki.png

I stand corrected. You are correct. He wasn't a judge at all.
 
Magistrates sign off on warrants all the time. That is part of their job.
No, it isn't.
You think the rule of law is 'shifty'. That's why you cannot ever be allowed to run anything. The depth of your stupidity is surprising even to me. I should have known better.
You despise the rule of law. You discard the Constitution of the United States. Don't hide behind the document you despise.
And yes, a Federal Magistrate is a judge.
No. A magistrate is not a judge. Redefinition fallacy.
In fact, their official title is 'Federal Magistrate Judge'.
A magistrate is not a judge. Redefinition fallacy.
Once again, you are a complete fucking moron. Jesus Christ man, pick up a fucking book and read.
Inversion fallacy. You are describing yourself again.
 
What reason would a judge that doesn't preside over criminal law have to sign a warrant, fucktard? I tell ya why they went to that guy, and it's the same reason they wanted Merrick Garland: They're probably pedos and compromised and the Dems have the the goods and leverage on them. They could never have gotten a real judge to sign off on that.
Well...at least they couldn't find a judge to sign of on that.
But do keep it up. This thing has cost Democrats thousands of votes already, and will be costing them more and more.
Indeed it has.
You obviously didn't read anything from the court case I posted, with all the precedents to this type of situation in it.

Trump's gonna get his stuff back and there's gonna be some people involved in this thing in trouble.
Time will tell. It really depends on whether election fraud by Democrats is enough to fault the election again.
This thing is over.
No, but the counter-suits will be entertaining. Check yer supply of popcorn!
 
A primary part of a Federal Magistrate Judges responsibility is to issue warrants you STUPID MOTHERFUCKER. Just stop.
Nope. A Magistrate does not have that authority. Only a judge may sign a search warrant, and only when the warrant specifically lists the place to be searched and the items to be seized. The warrant must also show cause for the search...a rather difficult thing to do since Trump had already worked with government agents to design and secure the storage area...AND THEY APPROVED IT, right up until these same agents broke the lock THEY REQUESTED BE PUT ON THE STORAGE AREA, following an illegal search warrant.
The irony here is that this Federal Magistrate has more experience in his little finger than the Trump appointed judge that made this ruling has in her entire body.
Irrelevant. Experience is not a factor, and you are just making shit up again.
 
For non-criminal law? What reason would there be to sign warrants for non-criminal laws broken? Hmm?

Yet still that judge is his boss, until he's removed from the bench, which will be shortly.

A magistrate cannot sign warrants for criminal law either. A judge is required, and that judge must follow the restrictions of the law before he is allowed to approve such a search.
 
The FBI is left wing now? When did this happen?

Classified or declassified, the documents do not belong to #TRE45ON.

You can look at it this way. Your neighbor asks to borrow your lawnmower. You lend it to him. He refuses to return it when you ask. Does he have a right to keep it now, since you let him use it, or does it still belong to you? Would you call his refusal to return your property "theft"?

What documents??????!?
 
To sum up, you're fine with a twice-impeached corrupt and criminal ex-POTUS who tried to overthrow the government keeping secret documents on top of his other crimes. You are a good little German, Soldat.

Trump was impeached once. You cannot impeach someone that is not in office. Impeachment is not conviction. You idiots still cannot name a crime or specifics. Trump did not condone the coup by Democrats. What documents?????!?
 
A judge wouldn't be referred to an "it". A department, like the Justice Department, would. The completely dishonest Gateway Pundit even shows a copy of the letter, which references May and is clearly a request by the FBI to access the 15 boxes already retrieved.

Judge’s order doesn’t show Biden ordered FBI search

CLAIM: A federal court order in the legal dispute over government documents held by former President Donald Trump shows President Joe Biden ordered the FBI search at Trump’s Florida home.

AP ASSESSMENT: False. Monday’s court order does include the phrase “as requested by the incumbent president” but it’s not related to last month’s search at Mar-a-Lago. The phrase comes from a May letter from the National Archives denying Trump’s request to delay turning over documents to the FBI. The letter states that the archives made the FBI aware of the documents after determining some of them were considered highly classified. The FBI then requested permission from the White House to access the documents, which the Biden administration granted.

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-trump-biden-search-documents-461520270373

Fake News.
 
No, it isn't.

You despise the rule of law. You discard the Constitution of the United States. Don't hide behind the document you despise.

No. A magistrate is not a judge. Redefinition fallacy.

A magistrate is not a judge. Redefinition fallacy.

Inversion fallacy. You are describing yourself again.

Version fallacy. You are describing oneself again.
 
Back
Top