judge may allow the men Kyle Rittenhouse shot to be called 'rioters' or 'looters'

[Into the Night]

He should have never been tried to begin with. Everybody knew what was going on. The riots were on the news every day. So the chances that Kyle was just shooting people willy nilly just for the hell of it was just about zero. If it was me, I wouldn't have ended up running away from the attackers like he did. I would have depopulated the whole fucking area! Also, I'm sure Mr Rittenhouse wasn't there doing what he was doing by himself. It seems to me that the others who were there with him could have told the cops what happened and why. But these days, negro appeasement seems to be what the government is trying to promote.

Quite right.

 

[Into the Night]

That's the way it appears. He's the guy that was shot in the arm and survived, IIRC. I'm waiting for the trial for the most part before accepting any facts.

Video is great but sometimes things are not as they appear. Chauvin's trial proved that the more views, the better. There was no doubt he killed a man.

I'm curious to see if more smartphone videos are introduced plus home security camera videos, the police car videos, etc.

They are already there, dude. RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

True. We know that he went there to start shit with people he did not like. He got a weapon. That was not tourism, even as rightys define 1-6 to be.

It is legal to carry a weapon, dude.

 

[Into the Night]

I think he went there to prevent shit. Not start it. And if his objective was to start the shit, he wouldn't have run away, would he.

Again. Well said.

 

[Into the Night]

what fucking cops are you talking about?

This is normal for Lefty. He often goes off into some random phrases. He can't seem to keep track of a conversation at all either.

 

[Into the Night]

Which opens the city to lawsuits. LOL I don't see how that helps Kyle. It only tarnishes Kenosha Police as being racists who support white supremacist vigilantism.

Isn't that what some Kenosha residents were protesting?

It doesn't expose the city to anything. If you don't see how it helps Kyle, you are obviously clueless.
It is YOU being racist here.

 

[Into the Night]

that must really be the woke thing to do these days........misconstrue and recreate a whole new narrative.......whatever

Bingo.

 

[Into the Night]

No one will take my bets. LOL

Time will tell.

When I took my Texas carry class the instructors cautioned that shooting someone would change your life. Kyle is finding that out the hard way.

It proves the age old maxim, "Don't go looking for trouble".

Kyle's life has not changed. He is still Kyle.

 

[Into the Night]

A matter of degree and I disagree that the majority of Americans live in fear.

That's the point; while I don't condone political violence, things are such that it can't be stopped. It's like watching two trains head for each other. Do your best to stop them but at some point all you can do is get out of the way.

I feel the nation is at that point that one Kyle's militia buddies or other group is going to commit an atrocity against American citizens just like Timothy McVeigh, the hero of many of that sort. The mass murder will shock Americans to root these terrorists out of their holes and bring them to justice.

Now it's just a matter of sitting back to see what happens. The Feds have already stopped a couple moronic, lone ranger attacks but I expect these domestic terrorists are putting a lot more planning into their operation.

McVeigh did not attack citizens. He specifically targeted the federal government in retaliation for the murders at Waco.

 

[Into the Night]

OMG. You are actually fine with shooting innocent Americans. You've gone over the edge.

What is innocent about murderers, looters, rioters, arsonists, or assaults?!?

You call these 'innocent Americans'??????

 

[Into the Night]

The variables in this case resulted in him being charged with murder.

But not convicted.

 

[Damocles]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-rules-explained/

Here's why people shot by Kyle Rittenhouse can be called "rioters," "looters" and "arsonists" – but not "victims" at trial...

 

[Into the Night]

Deja Vu all over again. Good luck shooting into a crowd of innocent Americans just so you can kill a black man.

You are completely wacked.

What is innocent about looters, arsonists, murderers, or those trying to assault you?

 

[Into the Night]

Facebook hate? LOL

The not-so-dumb militias did not take part in the Insurrection or domestic terrorism. They should be very useful catching the terrorists.

What insurrection? What militia???

WTF are you talking about???!?

 

[Into the Night]

This so-called judge at not playing with a full deck with asinine ways of failing to adjudicate his responsibilities in a impartial way over the years, and should have been thrown off the bench years ago. Now this so-called judge has dismissed the murder of others in favor of this hoodlum little boy who who should be tried as a adult for at least two counts of second degree murder, in particular, and who had no business with a weapon of that caliber. I suppose this disgraced so-called judge at also disgracing the dead at twisting things around to make them out to be the criminals, when in fact they did not go after the real murderous criminal Rittenhouse. I also suppose this so-called judge might have a certain unethical infatuation with his little killer boy Rittenhouse, which is a disgrace to the common decency of U.S. society and the legal profession.

Self defense is not murder, even if the defense results in a death.

 

[Into the Night]

1) BLM "looters and rioters" is the reason Kyle was shooting into a crowd along with white supremacist militias. Denying racism is already in the equation is idiotic if not a bald-face lie.

2) Same here, but you're being evasive again. You're claiming you'd shoot into a crowd, recklessly endangering their lives, to kill one person taking a swing at you.

Kyle was not shooting into a crowd.
What militia are you talking about??!?

SmarterthanYou never claimed he would shoot into a crowd or be reckless.

You are hallucinating!

 

[Into the Night]

Now who's making it racist?

You.

Your choice but don't be surprised when you are arrested for recklessly endangering the lives of American citizens and children in your zeal to shoot someone taking a swing at you.

Arsonists, looters, murderers, and violent thugs are not innocent American citizens, dumbass.

Kyle is going down for injecting himself into a situation with deadly intent

He didn't.

and it resulted in two deaths and a maiming.

Self defense resulted in two deaths and a maiming. The only ones hit were the attackers. Turns out Kyle is a good shot!

Like any other death(s), there must be a reckoning regardless if it's a 17 year old white supremacist domestic terrorist or a famous movie star.

What about the reckoning for the property damage and people assaulted by these thugs? Nah...you don't want to talk about that! You want to label them 'innocent Americans'!!

 

[Into the Night]

Why? I've repeatedly stated that all violent offenders should be rounded up to face justice. BLM or Trumper Terrorist, the laws apply equally to all. Meanwhile, you support vigilantism, domestic terrorist groups and murdering Americans in an effort to advance your agenda to be "collateral damage".

How many of arrests and convictions resulted from those events in August 2020?

Kyle is not a violent offender.

 

[Into the Night]

Right, so do you understand how to read laws and statutes?

Because the FIRST STATUTE is that you must be at least 18 years of age to carry a firearm in public as Rittenhouse did that evening.

He wasn't between 14 and 16 years old, so that statute doesn't apply.

He wasn't doing target practice, and he was clearly not being supervised by an adult.

And he wasn't under 16 years of age when he went on his mass shooting, he was 17, so 29.304 doesn't apply because Rittenhouse was 17, not under 16.

Still quoting only part of the law as the complete law, eh? Special pleading fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

I can't help it that you are too dumb to understand what you're reading.

The first statute you gave me applies only to people under the age of 16, Rittenhouse was 17 at the time of his massacre.

Then the next statute you gave me was that it would be acceptable for someone to carry the rifle in public as Rittenhouse did that evening, so long as he applied for and received a hunting approval based on a safety certificate that he got after completing adequate training.

But the problem is that Rittenhouse has no such certificate nor does he have that approval from Wisconsin, and even if he did, the statute you gave me was for approval of hunting has nothing to do with him walking around the streets of Kenosha.

What massacre???

Kyle shot three people in self defense.