judge may allow the men Kyle Rittenhouse shot to be called 'rioters' or 'looters'

[Dutch Uncle]

and your stock just went back down........

Only among white supremacist domestic terrorists and I think those fuckers need to be in prison.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

1) BLM "looters and rioters" is the reason Kyle was shooting into a crowd along with white supremacist militias. Denying racism is already in the equation is idiotic if not a bald-face lie.

what an outrageous assumption, on your part, considering that kyle had to defend himself from WHITE people

2) Same here, but you're being evasive again. You're claiming you'd shoot into a crowd, recklessly endangering their lives, to kill one person taking a swing at you.

so fast it would make your head swim and it would all be the fault of the idiot swinging at me.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Only among white supremacist domestic terrorists and I think those fuckers need to be in prison.

and that is what makes YOU the racist...........when all you have left is insults and a race card, throw that bitch down and hope it backs everyone up..........

 

[Dutch Uncle]

what an outrageous assumption, on your part, considering that kyle had to defend himself from WHITE people


so fast it would make your head swim and it would all be the fault of the idiot swinging at me.

Now who's making it racist?

Your choice but don't be surprised when you are arrested for recklessly endangering the lives of American citizens and children in your zeal to shoot someone taking a swing at you.

Kyle is going down for injecting himself into a situation with deadly intent and it resulted in two deaths and a maiming. Like any other death(s), there must be a reckoning regardless if it's a 17 year old white supremacist domestic terrorist or a famous movie star.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

and that is what makes YOU the racist...........when all you have left is insults and a race card, throw that bitch down and hope it backs everyone up..........

Why? I've repeatedly stated that all violent offenders should be rounded up to face justice. BLM or Trumper Terrorist, the laws apply equally to all. Meanwhile, you support vigilantism, domestic terrorist groups and murdering Americans in an effort to advance your agenda to be "collateral damage".

How many of arrests and convictions resulted from those events in August 2020?

 

[LV426]

the statute I gave you was 29.304............29.593 just gives those requirements to meet 29.304.

Right, so do you understand how to read laws and statutes?

Because the FIRST STATUTE is that you must be at least 18 years of age to carry a firearm in public as Rittenhouse did that evening.

He wasn't between 14 and 16 years old, so that statute doesn't apply.

He wasn't doing target practice, and he was clearly not being supervised by an adult.

And he wasn't under 16 years of age when he went on his mass shooting, he was 17, so 29.304 doesn't apply because Rittenhouse was 17, not under 16.

 

[LV426]

tyou didn't prove me wrong here..........you actually proved me right, so thanks.

How do you figure that when the literal first statute is that you must be at least 18 years of age to carry that weapon as Rittenhouse did that evening?

the statute I gave you was 29.304.

Which applies to kids UNDER THE AGE OF 16 YOU STUPID FUCK:

29.304  Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age.

Rittenhouse was 17 when he went on his rampage.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Right, so do you understand how to read laws and statutes?

Because the FIRST STATUTE is that you must be at least 18 years of age to carry a firearm in public as Rittenhouse did that evening.

He wasn't between 14 and 16 years old, so that statute doesn't apply.

He wasn't doing target practice, and he was clearly not being supervised by an adult.

you either don't understand statutes and laws, or you willfully ignored the 3rd exception which allows for 17 year olds to carry rifles if they have an accepted certificate for rifle safety from any state.............

 

[LV426]

or you willfully ignored the 3rd exception which allows for 17 year olds to carry rifles if they have an accepted certificate for rifle safety from any state.............

So does Rittenhouse have that certificate? No, he doesn't.

So what else ya got?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

So does Rittenhouse have that certificate? No, he doesn't.

So what else ya got?

you have proof that he doesn't have it?

 

[LV426]

the statute I gave you was 29.304

29.304: Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age. - So no, that statute that you "gave me" doesn't support your argument since Rittenhouse was 17.

29.593 just gives those requirements to meet 29.304

Well let's see if that's true:

29.593  Requirement for certificate of accomplishment to obtain hunting approval.

So...that's for hunting, that's not for open carrying a weapon in public.

So you don't understand anything you're writing here.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

29.304: Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age. - So no, that statute that you "gave me" doesn't support your argument since Rittenhouse was 17.




Well let's see if that's true:

29.593  Requirement for certificate of accomplishment to obtain hunting approval.

So...that's for hunting, that's not for open carrying a weapon in public.

So you don't understand anything you're writing here.

yeah, i've gotten my fill of todays laughs from you

thanks for the entertainment of seeing you get things so fucking wrong...

 

[LV426]

the statute I gave you was 29.304............29.593 just gives those requirements to meet 29.304. you really need to learn how to read ALL the law, not just the parts you need.

That's what you are doing here, my dude.

So this is the statute you "gave me", notice how 17 year olds are not included in the statute at all:

29.304: Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age.
(1)  Persons under 12 years of age.
(a) Prohibition on hunting. No person under 12 years of age may hunt with a firearm, bow and arrow, or crossbow.
(b) Restrictions on possession or control of a firearm. No person under 12 years of age may have in his or her possession or control any firearm unless he or she is enrolled in the course of instruction under the hunter education program and he or she is carrying the firearm in a case and
unloaded to or from that class under the supervision of his or her parent or guardian, or by a person at least 18 years of age who is designated by the parent or guardian, or is handling or operating the firearm during that class under the supervision of an instructor.
(c) Restrictions on obtaining hunting approval. Except as provided under par. (d), no person under 12 years of age may obtain any approval authorizing hunting.
(d) Restrictions on validity of certificate of accomplishment. A person under 12 years of age may obtain a certificate of accomplishment if he or she complies with the requirements of s. 29.591 (4) but that certificate is not valid for the hunting of small game until that person becomes 12
years of age.
(2)  Persons 12 to 14 years of age.
(a) Restrictions on hunting. No person 12 years of age or older but under 14 years of age may hunt unless he or she is accompanied by his or her parent or guardian, or by a person at least 18 years of age who is designated by the parent or guardian.
(b) Restrictions on possession or control of a firearm. No person 12 years of age or older but under 14 years of age may have in his or her possession or control any firearm unless he or she:
1. Is accompanied by his or her parent or guardian or by a person at least 18 years of age who is designated by the parent or guardian; or
2. Is enrolled in the course of instruction under the hunter education program and is carrying the firearm in a case and unloaded to or from that class or is handling or operating the firearm during that class under the supervision of an instructor.
(3)  Persons 14 to 16 years of age.
(a) Restrictions on hunting. No person 14 years of age or older but under 16 years of age may hunt unless he or she:
1. Is accompanied by his or her parent or guardian or by a person at least 18 years of age who is designated by the parent or guardian; or
2. Is issued a certificate of accomplishment that states that he or she successfully completed the course of instruction under the hunter education program or has a similar certificate, license, or other evidence satisfactory to the department indicating that he or she has successfully
completed in another state, country, or province a hunter education course recognized by the department.
(b) Restrictions on possession or control of a firearm. No person 14 years of age or older but under 16 years of age may have in his or her possession or control any firearm unless he or she:
1. Is accompanied by his or her parent or guardian or by a person at least 18 years of age who is designated by the parent or guardian;
2. Is enrolled in the course of instruction under the hunter education program and is carrying the firearm in a case and unloaded to or from that class or is handling or operating the firearm during that class under the supervision of an instructor; or
3. Is issued a certificate of accomplishment that states that he or she successfully completed the course of instruction under the hunter education program or has a similar certificate, license, or other evidence satisfactory to the department indicating that he or she has successfully
completed in another state, country, or province a hunter education course recognized by the department.
(4)  Parental obligation. No parent or guardian of a child under 16 years of age may authorize or knowingly permit the child to violate this section.
(4m)  Hunting mentorship program. The prohibition specified in sub. (1) (a) and the restrictions specified in subs. (1) (b) to (d), (2), and (3) do not apply to a person who is hunting with a mentor and who complies with the requirements specified under s. 29.592.
(5)  Exception.
(a) Notwithstanding subs. (1) to (3), a person 12 years of age or older may possess or control a firearm and may hunt with a firearm, bow and arrow, or crossbow on land under the ownership of the person or the person's family if no license is required and if the firing of firearms is
permitted on that land.
(b)
1. In this paragraph, “ target practice" includes trap shooting or a similar sport shooting activity regardless of whether the activity involves shooting at a fixed or a moving target.
2. The restrictions on the possession and control of a firearm under sub. (1) do not apply to a person using a firearm in target practice if he or she is accompanied by his or her parent or guardian or by a person at least 18 years of age who is designated by the parent or guardian.
History: 1983 a. 420; 1997 a. 197; 1997 a. 248 s. 431; Stats. 1997 s. 29.304; 2005 a. 289; 2009 a. 39; 2011 a. 252, 258.
Cross-reference: See also s. NR 10.001, Wis. adm. code.

So how does the safety certificate requirement for hunting approval by a 17 year old under a separate statute have anything to do with the statute above that applies to people under the age of 16?

 

[LV426]

yeah, i've gotten my fill of todays laughs from you

I can't help it that you are too dumb to understand what you're reading.

The first statute you gave me applies only to people under the age of 16, Rittenhouse was 17 at the time of his massacre.

Then the next statute you gave me was that it would be acceptable for someone to carry the rifle in public as Rittenhouse did that evening, so long as he applied for and received a hunting approval based on a safety certificate that he got after completing adequate training.

But the problem is that Rittenhouse has no such certificate nor does he have that approval from Wisconsin, and even if he did, the statute you gave me was for approval of hunting has nothing to do with him walking around the streets of Kenosha.

 

[LV426]

you have proof that he doesn't have it?

Yes, because his lawyers would have entered it into evidence pre-trial.

 

[zymurgy]

This so-called judge at not playing with a full deck with asinine ways of failing to adjudicate his responsibilities in a impartial way over the years, and should have been thrown off the bench years ago. Now this so-called judge has dismissed the murder of others in favor of this hoodlum little boy who who should be tried as a adult for at least two counts of second degree murder, in particular, and who had no business with a weapon of that caliber. I suppose this disgraced so-called judge at also disgracing the dead at twisting things around to make them out to be the criminals, when in fact they did not go after the real murderous criminal Rittenhouse. I also suppose this so-called judge might have a certain unethical infatuation with his little killer boy Rittenhouse, which is a disgrace to the common decency of U.S. society and the legal profession.

cuckoo

 

[Nordberg]

Rittenhouse got lucky and has a weird judge who will likely push the trial his way. But he went to Wisconsin for evil purposes. It was not tourism.

 

[LV426]

should a cop surrender to being beaten to death to avoid firing in to a crowd while defending himself?

When, in the history of the US, have cops ever been beaten to death by an angry crowd?

NEVER.

When, in the history of the US, has an angry crowd of cops ever beaten someone to death? ALL THE FUCKING TIME.

 

[anonymoose]

Rittenhouse got lucky and has a weird judge who will likely push the trial his way. But he went to Wisconsin for evil purposes. It was not tourism.

Less evil than the rioters. They went to burn and loot. Kyle went to protect from the arsonists. More dumb than evil I'd say.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

When, in the history of the US, have cops ever been beaten to death by an angry crowd?

NEVER.

When, in the history of the US, has an angry crowd of cops ever beaten someone to death? ALL THE FUCKING TIME.

so cops are somehow magically immune from dying due to mob attacks?