Yes, the Democrats did since Roe, they used it to murder millions of unborn children.Earl, stay with subjects within your small range of intelligence. No one claimed abortion was ever an "enumerated" right.
Poor, poor Marty.
Yes, the Democrats did since Roe, they used it to murder millions of unborn children.Earl, stay with subjects within your small range of intelligence. No one claimed abortion was ever an "enumerated" right.
Well, Nordy, the Democrats claimed a Constitutional right that was not enumerated in the Constitution.Cannot read huh? Abortion was not mentioned in the Constitution. The anti-abortionists made this crap up and pressured the Supremes into allowing it to be dealt with. Once they opened that door, the Christian Fascists rallied and walked through.
If it is murder, why are they not charged with it? How would you punish a girl who got an abortion to save her future? Will you take a rapists baby and make it your own responsibility? You take a complicated personal problem and turn it into a "killing babies" meme. That shows your depth. There are lots of problems to consider and your simple meme takes you out of the discussion.
Abortion is not enumerated in The Constitution, Earl. It was a right found by the Warren court based on another unenumerated right, that of privacy. Maybe try a third "poor" next time.Yes, the Democrats did since Roe, they used it to murder millions of unborn children.
Poor, poor Marty.
Well, Marty, the un-enumerated Constitutional right that was used to murder millions of the unborn never existed, did it?Abortion is not enumerated in The Constitution, Earl. It was a right found by the Warren court based on another unenumerated right, that of privacy. Maybe try a third "poor" next time.
Well, Marty, the un-enumerated Constitutional right that was used to murder millions of the unborn never existed, did it?
As I said, there was never an enumerated Constitutional right to abortion, Marty.Yeah, it did, Earl. Sorry. It’s actually not possible to overturn a non-existent right, strange as that may seem to you.
Again, find a different topic here.
Wrong. The judge wasn't ruling what is the law, is was a bunch of emotional partisan political pabulum.
PAGE 31 – OPINION AND ORDER
CONCLUSION
For the above reasons, this Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining
Order, ECF 6, and temporarily enjoins Defendants’ September 28, 2025, Memorandum ordering
the federalization and deployment of Oregon National Guard service members to Portland.
An interesting read because the judge talks about the reality of what is happening in Portland vs what the President claims is happening.
The judge doesn't go so far as to say Trump is delusional but does say this -
The President’s determination
was simply untethered to the facts
Wrong. Activist jurists disagree with the law and believe that they can dictate to the Executive Branch,Looks like courts disagree with fascism. The courts will save us unless Trump ignores them - which is a possibility!
What part has anything to do with actual law???You might want to read the ruling. It is a 14 day TRO and the merits are to be argued in court at some point to result in a permanent injunction
Slows down what process?
Trump today claimed buildings were being burnt down in Portland and there is no evidence of that happening.
What we are seeing is evidence of Trump having dementia since he is out of touch with reality.
What this moron is ignoring is the supremacy clause.PAGE 2 – OPINION AND ORDER
IMMERGUT, District Judge.
This case involves the intersection of three of the most fundamental principles in our
constitutional democracy. The first concerns the relationship between the federal government
and the states. The second concerns the relationship between the United States armed forces and
domestic law enforcement. The third concerns the proper role of the judicial branch in ensuring
that the executive branch complies with the laws and limitations imposed by the legislative
branch. Whether we choose to follow what the Constitution mandates with respect to these three
relationships goes to the heart of what it means to live under the rule of law in the United States.
Which of those 3 fundamental principles should we ignore?
Absurdity; the last desperate refuge for the ignorant, the dishonest and the stupid when they know they have lost an argument.Really? At which level, Clarence Darrow?
You have no idea whether or not the decision will stand. I'm predicting it will. Military in the streets at the whim of the Executive? It's everything our founders fought against.
More lame bullshit from the lying leftist halfwit. There is no evidence it was arson and if so, has nothing to do with Republicans you dumb, lying leftist asshat.Is it comments like yours that lead to results like this?
Suspected arson of liberal judge's home
![]()
SLED Investigating Alleged Arson Incident At S.C. Judge's Home - FITSNews
Palmetto State circuit court judge Dianne Goodstein had been receiving death threats, sources say...www.fitsnews.com
No, it doesn't strawman pontificator. But it is ironic how you are willing to ignore the insurrectionist and inciteful statements made by Democrats.It continues to make your statement an incitement to violence based on the standard the RW has set.
ProjectionYeah. And? Perhaps you need to get out of your cult and see what is happening in the real world.
Trumpys are happy the judge's home got burned down. As Trump shows, extreme violence is part of his method to change the country into his fiefdom.
Trump ignores Posse Comitatus, like he does any other law that slows down his power-grabbing administration. He even created an army that is loyal to him to evade the law.
I would think even the right would be alarmed at where Trump is going.
There have been. If you had a brain, which obviously you do not, you could comprehend the obvious.Have there been any riots in Portland in the last 100 days? yes/no
This will show how deep you are in the cult.
Indeed, TD.There have been. If you had a brain, which obviously you do not, you could comprehend the obvious.
On Saturday, Oct. 4, 2025, OPB reporters witnessed escalation of federal tactics against protesters outside of the ICE facility
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQtm5LATz_o
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQiHJ_6uP64
I see Poopiehead has decided to show how dedicated he is to the cult by coming here and showing he is as untethered to facts with his beliefs as Trump is. Perhaps Poopiehead got a law degree by staying in a Holiday Inn Express last night.Wrong. The judge wasn't ruling what is the law, is was a bunch of emotional partisan political pabulum.
This judge is untethered to any facts. Claiming that there was no violence or threat to Federal property and Federal law enforcement was a dumb lie.
They are lying morons on steroids who think they can continue to lie and gaslight the American people into supporting policies no one with a brain would support.Indeed, TD.
Are these far left loons saying that there is no rioting in Portland and hasn’t been for the last months?
They must be the same far left loons who said that the border was closed, and that the vegetable was sharp as a tack. They sound like Baghdad Bob.