Judge Aileen Cannon indicates that she may dismiss the classified documents case

Walt said:
There needs to be a jury impaneled for prejudice to attach. For a judge to dismiss a case after a jury has been impaneled requires something major and new, not around before the jury was impaneled. There is no magic way that judges can cover up cases without an appeal allowed.



Then have your wife explain to you that a judge cannot just decide to attach prejudice for the fun of it. The trial has to be in full swing for prejudice to be attached. That would require the trial first not to be dismissed.
Click to expand...
But she hasn't ruled on immunity yet. For just that reason
 
QP! said:
You guys need to STOP speaking on matters of law, as if you know the facts, when you do not and are stupid.



She would be immediately overturned and scolded for the THIRD TIME, by the appellate court. A very right wing court.
Click to expand...

She would be more than scolded. It would be the third time she has been reversed. The appellate court will have had enough and reassign the case to a competent judge.
 
BartenderElite said:
I wish this was surprising.
Click to expand...

She's been slow rolling this until after the election. IMO, her behavior has damaged her reputation as a judge, but enhanced it as a Trump loyalist.

Dismissing Trump's obstruction, theft and classified material mishandling isn't necessary since all she has to do is slow roll it until after November when 1) Trump dismisses it himself if he wins or 2) it no longer matters if he's convicted should he lose.
 
ExpressLane said:
No I am not . My wife was a federal court reporter for the Chief Justice of the Northern District of Texas for more than 30 years. So I am more cognizant of how the court system works than most people are. Trump MAY stand trial. But if the judge dismisses the case with prejudice it cannot be retried.
Click to expand...

It could be appealed!
 
Walt said:
There needs to be a jury impaneled for prejudice to attach. For a judge to dismiss a case after a jury has been impaneled requires something major and new, not around before the jury was impaneled. There is no magic way that judges can cover up cases without an appeal allowed.



Then have your wife explain to you that a judge cannot just decide to attach prejudice for the fun of it. The trial has to be in full swing for prejudice to be attached. That would require the trial first not to be dismissed.
Click to expand...

THIS!!!
 
i will repeat in FULL, what i cited earlier as so Magats, again struggle to understand any thing legal.


WHAT DOES “DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE” MEAN IN A CRIMINAL CASE

Dismissal of a criminal case may occur before, during, or after trial. It may be the result of a motion to dismiss by the prosecutor or by the defendant, or due to a determination made by the court without a motion from either party.

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
In the dismissal context, the term prejudice refers to whether the court has made a final determination on the case. The prejudice relates to the prosecutor’s ability to pursue the charges in another subsequent proceeding.

A dismissal with prejudice means that the ruling is the final judgment in the case. The dismissal prohibits the prosecutor from refiling the charges. In a dismissal without prejudice, the prosecutor can refile the charges (or file new charges based on the same circumstances) at some future time.

A dismissal with prejudice is much more desirable for the defendant than dismissal without prejudice. When a criminal case is dismissed with prejudice, the prosecutor cannot file new charges or reopen the case. The dismissal permanently ends the case in the defendant’s favor. The prosecutor’s only option for continuing the case is to appeal the dismissal ruling to a higher court, which may happen if the prosecutor disagrees with the judge’s decision...
Click to expand...
 
LurchAddams said:
Got some bad news for you, tiger. It looks like trump will have to face justice for his crimes.

Prosecutors said the files Trump is charged with possessing are presidential records, not personal ones, and that the statute does not apply to classified and top-secret documents, like those kept at Mar-a-Lago
Click to expand...

Prosecutors say a lot of stupid things; just look at Fulton County. That doesn't make it so halfwit. I wish you had a brain. Really I do.
 
QP! said:
You guys need to STOP speaking on matters of law, as if you know the facts, when you do not and are stupid.

She would be immediately overturned and scolded for the THIRD TIME, by the appellate court. A very right wing court.
Click to expand...

:lolup: Low IQ clown thinks he has the facts. :rofl2:
 
Jarod said:
If she does so before the jury is sworn, she will be brutally overturned by the appellate courts once again!

She just might be deviously Trumped that she will wait until jeopardy attaches and then dismiss the case, thereby extinguishing appellate rights.
Click to expand...

It would be graphic judicial misconduct on top of two prejudicial reversals in a case she is able to sit on because the accused put her there. It would be risking her judgeship if she hasn't risked it already.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top