Jimmy Kimmel’s short-lived ratings spike comes to screeching halt

Anything public cannot be regulated, relating to speech, by the government. They are prohibited by the clear language of the First Amendment.
Wrong.

Why are airwaves regulated?

Airwaves run across interstate and international waters, leading to some form of regulation.
 
I do not know off hand, but it does not matter, the First Amendment allows to utter what others things are lies, the First Amendment Says so.

Trump lies on the airways all the time.
So, you don't know what he said but you are defending it.

Do you understand that is the definition of a fool?

Do you understand that this is gibberish..."the First Amendment allows to utter what others things are lies,..."?
 
Last edited:
Jimmy Kimmel’s short-lived ratings spike comes to screeching halt.

From the link:

On Thursday, “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” averaged 2.3 million total viewers — a staggering 64% drop from the 6.5 million who tuned in for Tuesday’s much-hyped return.

Kimmel shed even more viewers in the advertiser-coveted demographic of adults aged 25-54, with Thursday’s episode hemorrhaging 73% of viewers from the critical category.

“Jimmy Kimmel Live!” pulled in 1.7 million viewers among the key demo for Tuesday’s return but plummeted to 465,000 only 48 hours later.

“Jimmy Kimmel Live!” also lost significant viewers in the younger demographic of adults aged 18-49, managing 1.2 million on Tuesday but quickly losing 73% to settle for only 334,000 on Thursday.

nypost.com
Jimmy Kimmel’s short-lived ratings spike comes to screeching halt
Jimmy Kimmel loses 64% of viewers after brief ratings spike post-suspension.
nypost.com nypost.com
 
Hate is what caused the murder of a man of God, Charlie Kirk.

His widow is trying to carry on his mission.

His two young children have no father.

There are some cretins on this forum, the poster of no. 49 is one.

Which god would that be, pEarl? Beelzebub? Baal? Trump? Moloch? Asmodeus? I have you pegged as a devotee of Moloch.
 
However, threats in public by someone official to take someone off the air "the easy way or the hard way" do. If there were none he would not be on the air.

If Carr was not inept, Kimmel would not be on the air. Carr is inept and stupid, doesn't know how to use plausible deniability, and created the result he has wrought.

Basically, if he acted like someone in government and used the phone and not a podcast, it would not look like the government was punishing someone for speech giving a path back to the airwaves. We know that this happened, because Kimmel is on the air. We don't need any further proof of it than that.

So to me you are saying "It's okay for the government to revoke someone's free speech as long as it's done secretly and can be made to look like something not-government." Hopefully this is just you being cynical rather than serious.
 
What rule? And if it was, do the FCC rules overrule the United States Constitution?
The FCC rule on the "public interest" does not involve First Amendment consideration. The FCC has an exception to the First Amendment to control the content of the airwaves "in the public interest.". Lying to the public is not in the public interest.
 
The FCC rule on the "public interest" does not involve First Amendment consideration. The FCC has an exception to the First Amendment to control the content of the airwaves "in the public interest.". Lying to the public is not in the public interest.
This should be pasted to the receptionist’s forehead.
 

This isn't surprising. In MAGATLand, women are supposed to be child-bearing, aytractive, silent arm candy. They are not supposed to get involved in politics other than voting the way they're told by the males in their family. They also don't like that she is fairly bright and has a college degree unlike her deceased spouse. It's from Liberty Univ. but it's still a degree. lol
 
The FCC does not operate in secret.

The FCC Engineer in Charge operates openly.

When you violate the regulations, you will hear from him…or her.

What is “aytractive”?
 
Which god would that be, pEarl? Beelzebub? Baal? Trump? Moloch? Asmodeus? I have you pegged as a devotee of Moloch.
The God of this world that created this world that you are ignorant of, and willingly so, probably because of your id.
The one you're not better than, just like Charlie Kirk. Or many others, for that matter, you're vile, seriously.
You can mock all you want, it all runs like clockwork, and you'll probably get ground up in the gears.
 
Its done Kimmel was disciplines for lying to the public.
Disciplined by having a huge ratings night, and he got paid for the days off. I didn't even really know who he was before this, now most Americans know him and that he has a show. That helps him a lot.
 
The FCC rule on the "public interest" does not involve First Amendment consideration. The FCC has an exception to the First Amendment to control the content of the airwaves "in the public interest.". Lying to the public is not in the public interest.
You can get exceptions to the bill of rights? Wow, I hope the people pushing for laws against certain mass killing rifles know about this.
 
The God of this world that created this world that you are ignorant of, and willingly so, probably because of your id.
The one you're not better than, just like Charlie Kirk. Or many others, for that matter, you're vile, seriously.
You can mock all you want, it all runs like clockwork, and you'll probably get ground up in the gears.
Your language towards others leads me to believe you aren’t too familiar with the god you worship.
 
Disciplined by having a huge ratings night, and he got paid for the days off. I didn't even really know who he was before this, now most Americans know him and that he has a show. That helps him a lot.
How much does he have to donate and to whom, retard? Do you know that? It's in the news..
 
So, you don't know what he said but you are defending it.

Do you understand that is the definition of a fool?

Do you understand that this is gibberish..."the First Amendment allows to utter what others things are lies,..."?
It does not matter at all to me what he said. Anyone who cannot understand the meaning of my above sentence, despite the typo is pretty dumb.
 
The God of this world that created this world that you are ignorant of, and willingly so, probably because of your id.
The one you're not better than, just like Charlie Kirk. Or many others, for that matter, you're vile, seriously.
You can mock all you want, it all runs like clockwork, and you'll probably get ground up in the gears.
Indeed and these haters now are criticizing his widow for trying to continue Charlie’s work.

These far left loons are despicable,
 
Back
Top