Jews control the media. Ye is right. Here's the proof.

The reason Jews are overrepresented in Finance and Entertainment is because for ~1000 years, anything Jews owned or controlled was taken from them by a millennia of pogroms all over Europe.

So the Jews started creating things not so easily stolen and now that it's prolific and profitable, the same old antisemites want to take from the Jews again.

Mayer Amschel more than made up for that.
 
Your post is total fiction. I'm Jewish and I don't hate anyone. I don't look as anyone as black or Jewish or whatever. People are people.

I know you're full of hate and wish everyone in America was white and Christian, but it's just not gonna happen. Sorry.

You are a lay-Jew you simpleton.

Like all other forms of extremism those who cause the problems are in the top few percent.
 
You are a lay-Jew you simpleton.

Like all other forms of extremism those who cause the problems are in the top few percent.

What are you even talking about, freak-show? Why don't you go back to what you're good at - biting the heads off live chickens?
 
listen, boomerjew,

globalism has nothing to do with jews.

https://www.definitions.net/definition/globalism


globalismnoun

An ideology based on the belief that people, goods and information ought to be able to cross national borders unfettered.

globalismnoun

A socio-economic system dedicated to free trade and free access to markets.

Freebase(3.68 / 18 votes)Rate this definition:
Globalism

Globalism can have at least two different and opposing meanings. One meaning is the attitude or policy of placing the interests of the entire world above those of individual nations. Another is viewing the entire world as a proper sphere for one nation to project political influence. American political scientist Joseph Nye, co-founder of the international relations theory of neoliberalism, argues that globalism refers to any description and explanation of a world which is characterized by networks of connections that span multi-continental distances; while globalization refers to the increase or decline in the degree of globalism. In his 2005 book The Collapse of Globalism and the Reinvention of the World, Canadian philosopher John Ralston Saul argued that, far from being an inevitable force, globalization is already breaking up into contradictory pieces and that citizens are reasserting their national interests in both positive and destructive ways.

Today, Globalist is a coded word for Jews who are seen as international elites conspiring to weaken or dismantle “Western” society using their international connections and control over big corporations (see New World Order)—all echoing the destructive theory that Jews hold greed and tribe above country.

https://www.ajc.org/translatehate/globalist
 
Is Ranting Against Globalism Anti Semitic?

The connection between globalists and Jews is, in part, the old anti-Semitic smear that Jews are not truly loyal citizens of any nation. Hitler described Jews as “international elements” that “conduct their business everywhere,” thus harming and undermining good people who are “bound to their soil, to the Fatherland.” Use of globalist as a negative term can be a dog whistle for the far right: those who recognize its roots in Hitler’s philosophy recognize that it’s an encoded way of denigrating Jews.

Some people speak interchangeably of globalism and cosmopolitanism. I absolutely identify as a cosmopolitan — someone who aspires to be a citizen of the wide world, with an awareness that in an interconnected community, we have ethical obligations even to people who live differently than we do. I learned that from the work of Ghanaian-American philosopher Kwame Appiah. I also recommend my ex-husband Ethan Zuckerman’s excellent book Rewire: Digital Cosmopolitans in the Age of Connection. So does that mean I’m a globalist, too?

https://forward.com/community/412627/globalism-anti-semitism/
 
Everyone should calm down....

and take in the joy of this happy couple:

tumblr_lfpte3aldc1qdzxe9o1_400.jpg
 
No- the Romans were simply the executioners at the behest of the Pharisees.

The Romans controlled Judea, not the Pharisees.

You can't even get basic antisemitism right.


Poor attempt at washing history's soiled hands there.

History's hands? Or you mean the Jews? So you're blaming Jews for Romans executing Jesus and you don't think you're antisemitic?
 
The Romans controlled Judea, not the Pharisees.

You can't even get basic antisemitism right.

At said ' at the behest of the Pharisees ', dumbass, not ' at the command '

You're a semantic schlemiel.


History's hands? Or you mean the Jews? So you're blaming Jews for Romans executing Jesus and you don't think you're antisemitic?

It's in all of history's newspapers, dumbass. Also- reporting the news does not equate to antisemitism. Identifying Jewish murderers is not antisemitic- although schlemiels, such as yourself, would very much like it to be. Tough titty.
 
At said ' at the behest of the Pharisees ', dumbass, not ' at the command '

Amazing to me that you think subjects of the Roman Empire were so persuasive that they could get the Romans to do anything...except leave Judea.
 
It's in all of history's newspapers, dumbass.

No it isn't.

The ramblings of an insane person in a cave are not "history's newspapers", they are a collection of fables and fairy tales -stolen from other cultures- and intended to manipulate people into being Christian.


Also- reporting the news does not equate to antisemitism

This isn't news.

The Bible is not a newspaper, it's a book of fiction.


Identifying Jewish murderers is not antisemitic

You literally just said yourself in this very same post that the Romans murdered Jesus at the behest of the Pharisees, implying that Jews secretly control the behavior of other people somehow...which is an antisemitic trope itself!

Tell me, how did the Pharisees manage to convince the Roman Empire to execute Jesus?
 
Back
Top