James Lovelock: Why are we so afraid of nuclear power?

maggot
th
Moonshi'ite is definitely reviled and totally scientifically illiterate.
Click to expand...


Your efforts to promote yourself as the forum's alpha cut-and-paste boffin are a source of entertainment, maggot, one of the reasons for visiting here. You must be very popular at real scientists coffee-breaks.


Haw, haw, haw, haw, haw....................haw, haw...........................haw.
 
moon said:
You have to be rather dim to believe that all nuclear nuts- such as your sad self- are on the political Right. Whatever powers your mental light-bulb is in need of recharging.,


Haw, haw.......................haw.

Silly fucker.
Click to expand...

I was trained and worked in nuclear power. I studied it in college too. At least I, unlike you, actually know how it works and the benefits and hazards of it as opposed to getting my information from some radical-Leftist environmentalist site run by people with degrees in things like Womyn's Studies, or playing the bassoon.

It would be nice if you actually knew anything about nuclear power other than nonsense fueled by hysteria and superstition.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I was trained and worked in nuclear power. I studied it in college too. At least I, unlike you, actually know how it works and the benefits and hazards of it as opposed to getting my information from some radical-Leftist environmentalist site run by people with degrees in things like Womyn's Studies, or playing the bassoon.

It would be nice if you actually knew anything about nuclear power other than nonsense fueled by hysteria and superstition.
Click to expand...

It seems to use the Guardian, the in-house magazine at the BBC, a lot especially for climate propaganda, but that's not unusual for Trots and twats. It clearly has never studied any scientific discipline in any great depth, preferring instead to resort to slogans, cliches and agitprop. The Russian "Firehose of Falsehood" propaganda model appears to be the driving force behind its lies and falsehoods.

https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE198.html
 
Last edited:
T. A. Gardner said:
I was trained and worked in nuclear power. I studied it in college too. At least I, unlike you, actually know how it works and the benefits and hazards of it as opposed to getting my information from some radical-Leftist environmentalist site run by people with degrees in things like Womyn's Studies, or playing the bassoon.

It would be nice if you actually knew anything about nuclear power other than nonsense fueled by hysteria and superstition.
Click to expand...

Your training was crap- otherwise you'd acknowledge the unacceptable dangers of the profiteering nuclear industry.
 
Nobody wants it. You force it onto communities. You dump it wherever you think you can get away with it. I look forward to the total collapse of the entire filthy industry.
 
moon said:
Nobody wants it. You force it onto communities. You dump it wherever you think you can get away with it. I look forward to the total collapse of the entire filthy industry.
Click to expand...

So, you refuse to have a dialogue and give actual examples backed with factual data hum? Yea, you're just another one of those delusional radical-Leftist's that talks nothing but smack and knows absolutely nothing about nuclear power or things nuclear. You're against it because your extremist Leftist quasi-political-religious views demand it. I'd put you in the same category as some hardcore Rightist religious fanatic who says stupid shit like It's in the Bible! God said it, I believe it, that ends it (the argument)!

It's myopic intransigent people like you arguing from total ignorance that keeps real, science and engineering-based solutions to problems from being implemented. Instead, you argue for what your religious dogma demands no matter how utterly insane it is--like demanding the world run on whirligigs and sunshine.
 
moon said:
It's already in the record. Get lost.
Click to expand...

This is the one and only time you tried to contribute anything other than opinion or insults to this thread.

That's the problem;

Why Japan Is Dumping Water From Fukushima Into the Sea

The Japanese utility giant Tepco is planning to release more than 1 million cubic meters of treated radioactive water -- enough to fill 500 Olympic-size swimming pools -- from the wrecked Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear power plant into the Pacific Ocean, part of its nearly $200 billion effort to clean up the worst atomic accident since Chernobyl. Storage tanks at the site are forecast to be full as early as mid-2022, and space for building more is scarce.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...fc8_story.html
Click to expand...

Haw, haw.....................haw.
Click to expand...

Below is my rebuttal to that entirely and completely demolishing your argument.

T. A. Gardner said:
So? US Navy aircraft carriers--they're nuclear powered--do that regularly. The amount they're releasing doesn't even amount to a drop in a five-gallon bucket. Aside from that, if the water has been treated it likely doesn't contain enough radiation to make any difference whatsoever compared to the natural radiation from isotopes in seawater. Yes, seawater has natural radioactivity in it.
So, a couple of 'tards that work for Bloomberg News get an article in the WaPo? It's clear that their Progressive leanings taint their work.

Objectively, the release is totally meaningless and routine. Nothing to see here, move along.

Here's the math: There are about 710,000,000 cubic kilometers of water in the Pacific Ocean. Water mixes freely so any released would be increasingly diluted. 1 million cubic meters of water is 1/1000 of a cubic kilometer (1x 10^9 cubic meters in a cubic kilometer). That means the amount released in relation to the amount of water in the Pacific Ocean is so infinitesimal as to be totally ignored.

giphy.gif
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top