Ivermectin Didn’t Reduce Covid-19 Hospitalizations in Largest Trial to Date

.
The insane cunt never gives up, must be a real nightmare in real life. Seriously Lousy Vermin fuck off, nobody gives a shit about your craziness.
 
It does a terrific number on the lungs!

It's remarks like that - and there are many of them - that show what a shocking ignoramus you-know-who is. And he will not learn, because learning would be an admission that he doesn't know it all already. That is not good, especially for someone in his former position.

What did he say when he was going around telling people that Lincoln was a Republican? "Nobody knew until I came along." Was he joking? It would be a joke against himself, and I don't think he is capable of that.

Sorry, Havvy. I can't respect a person like that.
 
I haven't a clue what NotAllThere is saying, but it is almost certain to be prime bullshit.


Professor Chris Butler, from the University Oxford’s Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Joint Chief Investigator of the PRINCIPLE trial, said,

‘Ivermectin is readily available globally, has been in wide use for many other infectious conditions so it’s a well-known medicine with a good safety profile, and because of the early promising results in some studies it is already being widely used to treat COVID-19 in several countries.

"Widely used" does not equal "effective." When YOUR family members got Covid, did you advise them to take quack meds like this, or to seek proven medical advice/treatment?
 
All along hospitals said their use of Ivermectin was worthless and sometimes damaging. The right claimed it was a miracle drug. They will not change as the data comes along over and over proving it does not work. They have right-wing beliefs that Trump facts,data, and science.
 
Let's look at the abstract, published by the respected New England Journal of Medicine. You can read the entire study here.

~~~
BACKGROUND
The efficacy of ivermectin in preventing hospitalization or extended observation in an emergency setting among outpatients with acutely symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), the disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is unclear.

METHODS
We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, adaptive platform trial involving symptomatic SARS-CoV-2–positive adults recruited from 12 public health clinics in Brazil. Patients who had had symptoms of Covid-19 for up to 7 days and had at least one risk factor for disease progression were randomly assigned to receive ivermectin (400 μg per kilogram of body weight) once daily for 3 days or placebo. (The trial also involved other interventions that are not reported here.) The primary composite outcome was hospitalization due to Covid-19 within 28 days after randomization or an emergency department visit due to clinical worsening of Covid-19 (defined as the participant remaining under observation for >6 hours) within 28 days after randomization.

RESULTS
A total of 3515 patients were randomly assigned to receive ivermectin (679 patients), placebo (679), or another intervention (2157). Overall, 100 patients (14.7%) in the ivermectin group had a primary-outcome event, as compared with 111 (16.3%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.90; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.70 to 1.16). Of the 211 primary-outcome events, 171 (81.0%) were hospital admissions. Findings were similar to the primary analysis in a modified intention-to-treat analysis that included only patients who received at least one dose of ivermectin or placebo (relative risk, 0.89; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.69 to 1.15) and in a per-protocol analysis that included only patients who reported 100% adherence to the assigned regimen (relative risk, 0.94; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.67 to 1.35). There were no significant effects of ivermectin use on secondary outcomes or adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS
Treatment with ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital due to progression of Covid-19 or of prolonged emergency department observation among outpatients with an early diagnosis of Covid-19. (Funded by FastGrants and the Rainwater Charitable Foundation; TOGETHER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04727424. opens in new tab.)
 
All along hospitals said their use of Ivermectin was worthless and sometimes damaging. The right claimed it was a miracle drug. They will not change as the data comes along over and over proving it does not work. They have right-wing beliefs that Trump facts,data, and science.

How true. We are watching Darwin's theories in real time -- fascinating.
 
All along hospitals said their use of Ivermectin was worthless and sometimes damaging. The right claimed it was a miracle drug. They will not change as the data comes along over and over proving it does not work. They have right-wing beliefs that Trump facts,data, and science.

Another stupid fucker that just spouts bullshit, the jury is still out on Ivermectin. Unlike you I'd prefer to wait for the PRINCIPLE trial, organised by Oxford University, rather than listen to left wing loonies like Madwitch, Lousy Vermin and you.
 
It's remarks like that - and there are many of them - that show what a shocking ignoramus you-know-who is. And he will not learn, because learning would be an admission that he doesn't know it all already. That is not good, especially for someone in his former position.

What did he say when he was going around telling people that Lincoln was a Republican? "Nobody knew until I came along." Was he joking? It would be a joke against himself, and I don't think he is capable of that.

Sorry, Havvy. I can't respect a person like that.

He never said the bollocks spouted by the Left, I expect that from the likes of Madwitch, Nutjob, Lousy Vermin and Daesh but expected better out of you.

https://www.politifact.com/factchec...mp-didnt-tell-americans-infected-coronavirus/
 
"Widely used" does not equal "effective." When YOUR family members got Covid, did you advise them to take quack meds like this, or to seek proven medical advice/treatment?
The guy got his doctorate in nurse education.

He's citing studies by people who say that he's lying about their findings.

Pretty much what Havana Moon always does.

Posts outdated, or bogus citations that often make him look like a moron.

Thankfully he put me on ignore a while ago. He used to fill my inbox with groans.
 
I haven't a clue what NotAllThere is saying, but it is almost certain to be prime bullshit.


Professor Chris Butler, from the University Oxford’s Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Joint Chief Investigator of the PRINCIPLE trial, said,

‘Ivermectin is readily available globally, has been in wide use for many other infectious conditions so it’s a well-known medicine with a good safety profile, and because of the early promising results in some studies it is already being widely used to treat COVID-19 in several countries.
LMFAO!!!!! 'Some studies'.

Yea...in Joe Rogan's butt.


Well then, it MUST work against the trump virus.
 
The bloody shits you were taking wasn't you evacuating COVID from your system, it was you shitting out your intestinal lining which means in a few years, you're not going to have control of your bowels and you'll either shit yourself every day and need Depends, or have to get a colostomy bag strapped to your side.
He doesn't actually use it. He just tries to get others to use it.

How can you tell when Havana Moon has you on ignore?

You don't get 'groaned' 50 times a day.
 
"Widely used" does not equal "effective." When YOUR family members got Covid, did you advise them to take quack meds like this, or to seek proven medical advice/treatment?
Widely used for parasites. It's safe.

Just not effective against Covid.
 
"Widely used" does not equal "effective." When YOUR family members got Covid, did you advise them to take quack meds like this, or to seek proven medical advice/treatment?

I take Ivermectin as do several Americans I know here. I've also had two Astra Zeneca jabs as well. Why the fuck shouldn't I take it Madwitch, answer that if you can?

As fir my family I certainly would have advised them to take it but you just can't get it in the UK very easily, not like here.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top