It's time for the forums leftist Democrats to step up and tell us what their party stands for

[IBDaMann]

By making them violently rebel against against the authorities?

Yes, exactly. That's how terrorists work. They push an agenda by instilling fear.

 

[AProudLefty]

Yes, exactly. That's how terrorists work. They push an agenda by instilling fear.

So they want terrorists in the USA? They want their own country destroyed? If it's destroyed, what's left to rule?

 

[IBDaMann]

So they want terrorists in the USA?

I see you have reverted back to your cryptic non-speak. What is the antecedent for "they"? Taken in context, you are asking if terrorists in the USA want terrorists in the USA? Of course they do. Duh!

They want their own country destroyed?

Objection! Calls for speculation ... and calls for much greater clarity.

If it's destroyed, what's left to rule?

Objection! The prosecution knows that the witness can't possibly testify to the prosecution's state of mind.

 

[AProudLefty]

I see you have reverted back to your cryptic non-speak. What is the antecedent for "they"? Taken in context, you are asking if terrorists in the USA want terrorists in the USA? Of course they do. Duh!


Objection! Calls for speculation ... and calls for much greater clarity.


Objection! The prosecution knows that the witness can't possibly testify to the prosecution's state of mind.

^ Too dumb to remember that "they" refers to Democrats.

 

[IBDaMann]

^ Too dumb to remember that "they" refers to Democrats.

^ Too dumb to remember to include the antecedent in the quoted text, or else include it in his own verbiage. He must be deaf.

 

[AProudLefty]

^ Too dumb to remember to include the antecedent in the quoted text, or else include it in his own verbiage. He must be deaf.

It's simple logic.

It was in response to this

For what purpose? Power/control/tyrannical rule. That's ultimately what Team Democrat wants for themselves. ...... and they'd STILL be miserable saps!

"They" being Democrats.

 

[IBDaMann]

It's simple logic.

Nope, it's laziness on your part that generates great ambiguity. You are at fault.

It was in response to this "They" being Democrats.

Not unless you either include that as quoted text or you use "Democrats" instead of "they" in your first usage.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

By making them violently rebel against against the authorities? You don't make sense. But then again you're not good at logic.

Sybil is cray-cray. Average or better intelligence but a few of his transistors are burned out for some reason. Anyone who truly believes his socks are other people is clearly schizophrenic.

 

[gfm7175]

By making them violently rebel against against the authorities? You don't make sense. But then again you're not good at logic.

They're ALREADY violently rebelling against the authorities. See the LA riots.

 

[gfm7175]

Sybil is cray-cray. Average or better intelligence but a few of his transistors are burned out for some reason. Anyone who truly believes his socks are other people is clearly schizophrenic.

I love it when Dutch holds conversations with himself.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I love it when Dutch holds conversations with himself.

^^^
I Irony

The mentally ill are the funniest people on JPP.

I've always been a member of it, but now I've unfortunately had to put Dutch Uncle onto the ignore list

Thankfully, on the new forum, Dutch can be put on ignore and his notification clutter trick doesn't work anymore.

I guarantee that Dutch will keep doing it right up until the very moment that you make an official rule about it. He's not going to honor any of your "requests", specifically because they are not official rules. That's how his mind operates.

I had to add him to my ignore list because this notification "trick" of his got too annoying. I still click on "show hidden content" to view everything that he posts, but at least I don't receive his purposely annoying (non)notifications anymore.

 

[gfm7175]

^^^
I Irony

The mentally ill are the funniest people on JPP.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

 

[gfm7175]

 

[Dutch Uncle]

View attachment 52194

 

[AProudLefty]

They're ALREADY violently rebelling against the authorities. See the LA riots.

They rioted over Rodney King.

 

[AProudLefty]

Nope, it's laziness on your part that generates great ambiguity. You are at fault.


Not unless you either include that as quoted text or you use "Democrats" instead of "they" in your first usage.

It was quoted.

Next time follow the conversation.

 

[IBDaMann]

It was quoted.

Not in that post. It has to be quoted in the post in question. I shouldn't be the first person to explain this to you.

 

[AProudLefty]

Not in that post. It has to be quoted in the post in question. I shouldn't be the first person to explain this to you.

I shouldn't be the first person to explain about following conversations to you.

Now that you realize that "they" was referring to Democrats, perhaps you'll care to address the original post and explain Gfm's strange logic.

 

[IBDaMann]

I shouldn't be the first person to explain about following conversations to you.

It was your post; you bear the full responsibility to not be so lazy as to induce ambiguity and incoherence. I shouldn't have to explain this to you.

... perhaps you'll care to address the original post and explain Gfm's strange logic.

The original post was Truth Detector's courteous listing of Democrat and leftist positions. There was nothing strange about gfm7175's logic. To what are you pretending to refer?