It's time for the forums leftist Democrats to step up and tell us what their party stands for

80% of the regular posters here have proven, repeatedly, they are unable to intelligently articulate what the Democratic party supports. It's all hyperbole and broad-brush painting....which is a tool of lazy people.
they're not issues based.

its strictly a divide and conquer plan.
 
they're not issues based.

its strictly a divide and conquer plan.
That's what politics is about.

Democrats use abortion to try to divide the country and Republicans use abortion to try to divide the country.

Democrats tried to use marriage rights to divide the country and Republicans try to use marriage rights to divide the country.

The way that politicians win is by taking a position on issues and hoping that enough people agree with your position on those issues..
 
When Sybil first showed up at JPP, along with all three of them having a link to the fake forum in their signatures,
You don't have a forum, Sybil. You have more than three socks.
it became apparent that the three different characters dovetailed nicely with Freud's psychoanalytic theory where personality is composed of three elements known as the id, the ego, and the superego.
Your own schizophrenia is your own problem, Sybil.
IBDaMann was the ID, ITN the ego and gfm7175 the superego.
I am not you, Sybil. IBDaMann is not you, and gfm7175 is not you. You can't blame your problems on anybody else, Sybil.
Over time they melded closer to the single personality.
There is only one of you, Sybil, but you have several socks.
IBDaMann toned down because Sybil couldn't keep up the energy level of the personality.
IBDaMann is not you, Sybil.
Freud's models are useful, but psychoanalytic psychology was never my field. Mine was Behaviorism.
Both are, from personal experience as the patient.

You are your own problem, Sybil. You cannot blame your problem on me, IBDaMann, gfm7175, or anybody else.

Now you can go back to your childish mimicry.
 
That's what politics is about.
Politics is not about divide and conquer.
Democrats use abortion to try to divide the country and Republicans use abortion to try to divide the country.
Nope. Abortion itself divides. It is murder for the sake of convenience. It is mostly Democrats that support it.
Democrats tried to use marriage rights to divide the country and Republicans try to use marriage rights to divide the country.
Nope. Marriage isn't rights. It is a state of being between a man and woman. There is no other form of marriage. No other arrangement is capable of procreation.
The way that politicians win is by taking a position on issues and hoping that enough people agree with your position on those issues..
That's called a vote. Duh.
 
Politics is not about divide and conquer.

Nope. Abortion itself divides. It is murder for the sake of convenience. It is mostly Democrats that support it.

Nope. Marriage isn't rights. It is a state of being between a man and woman. There is no other form of marriage. No other arrangement is capable of procreation.

That's called a vote. Duh.
Ignoring your usual word games Because you know that a reference to marriage rights is he referenced to the right of gays to marry. Despite knowing that, you still insist on acting like a jackass, Rather than actually engaging the topic.

Politicians pick a side on an issue, and try to present their case with the hopes of getting votes. That is true of gay rights, that is true on abortion and that is true on every topic that They believe will influence voters.

The dividing of voters is inherent in the process. That's why you consistently hear politicians using inflammatory words like murderer, homophobe, racist etc. It's all an attempt to separate us from them, thus dividing.
 
Last edited:
Ignoring your usual word games
You can't blame your word games on me or anybody else, Void.
Because you know that a reference to marriage rights
Marriage is not a right. It's a state of being between a man and women.
is he referenced to the right of gays to marry.
Not possible. Marriage is a state of being between a man and women. Two men cannot procreate. Two women cannot procreate.
Despite knowing that, you still insist on acting like a jackass, Rather than actually engaging the topic.
Inversion fallacy. Redefinition fallacies.
Politicians pick a side on an issue,
The redefinition of words by you and other Democrats is an issue, and I will keep pointing it out.
and try to present their case with the hopes of getting votes.
Redefining words does not get votes.
That is true of gay rights,
No such thing.
that is true on abortion
Murder is not a right.
and that is true on every topic that They believe will influence voters.
Murder is not a right. Violence is not a right. Theft is not a right.
The dividing of voters is inherent in the process. That's why you consistently hear politicians using inflammatory words like murderer, homophobe, racist etc. It's all an attempt to separate us from them, thus dividing.
Redefinition fallacies (murder<->void, racism<->void).

Go learn English.
 
You can't blame your word games on me or anybody else, Void.

Marriage is not a right. It's a state of being between a man and women.

Not possible. Marriage is a state of being between a man and women. Two men cannot procreate. Two women cannot procreate.

Inversion fallacy. Redefinition fallacies.

The redefinition of words by you and other Democrats is an issue, and I will keep pointing it out.

Redefining words does not get votes.

No such thing.

Murder is not a right.

Murder is not a right. Violence is not a right. Theft is not a right.

Redefinition fallacies (murder<->void, racism<->void).

Go learn English.
All ignored due to continued word games and an inability to engage in intelligent conversation.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top