It's price gouging, not inflation or supply issues

Of course...but last night, OPEC announced it would increase production, which caused the price per barrel to drop by 13% overnight.




I think starting a new oil company is much easier said than done.

The problem is that oil is bought and sold on the global markets, and the global supply is controlled by a cartel...so like I said before, we could quadruple oil production in the US but it won't matter because OPEC will simply adjust their production to account for ours in order to maintain the price per barrel....and that's if they're feeling nice.

They could always choose to be gigantic assholes and increase oil production by so much, it bankrupts US companies...which is what they actually did in 2015-16.

The thing is you can't haven't both ways. If you want low prices you need competition. If you want independence it's costly. Eventually though prices would spike downward

As to the ease of starting an oil company it shouldn't be easy but but can be done.
 
Of course...but last night, OPEC announced it would increase production, which caused the price per barrel to drop by 13% overnight.




I think starting a new oil company is much easier said than done.

The problem is that oil is bought and sold on the global markets, and the global supply is controlled by a cartel...so like I said before, we could quadruple oil production in the US but it won't matter because OPEC will simply adjust their production to account for ours in order to maintain the price per barrel....and that's if they're feeling nice.

They could always choose to be gigantic assholes and increase oil production by so much, it bankrupts US companies...which is what they actually did in 2015-16.

so in this case the price will keep falling. a race to the bottom is good in commodity prices.
 
the problem is oil drilling stopping due to environmental lies.

A complete and total lie.

Those companies hold millions of acres of land they could drill on, they're just choosing not to because drilling more means lower oil prices, which means lower oil profits.
 
The thing is you can't haven't both ways. If you want low prices you need competition. If you want independence it's costly. Eventually though prices would spike downward

Independence doesn't have to cost a thing if you're willing to nationalize the industry.

The only way the price of oil goes down is either if OPEC wants it to, or if we nationalize it for public consumption.


As to the ease of starting an oil company it shouldn't be easy but but can be done.

But that immediately places that company at a disadvantage because that company will not:

1) Have any operations
2) Hold any leases
3) Possess any of the commodity

It would have to be deficit financed, and I just don't see a bank or lender willing to stake that kind of loan on an industry that is completely controlled by a cartel.
 
so in this case the price will keep falling. a race to the bottom is good in commodity prices.

But it's not good for the oil companies, which is why they don't open up new drilling on the millions of acres they've already leased.

We keep coming back to the same thing no matter how we look at it; profit is in direct contradiction with energy independence.

To achieve energy independence, what do you need? To extract the amount of oil that aligns with our consumption. But we know that the more oil that is extracted, the less profitable it becomes. So we can never, ever achieve energy independence because of for-profit companies that would lose money if production increased.
 
A complete and total lie.

Those companies hold millions of acres of land they could drill on, they're just choosing not to because drilling more means lower oil prices, which means lower oil profits.

Nope, because more regulations mean lower profits, capping royalties for example.
 
Independence doesn't have to cost a thing if you're willing to nationalize the industry.

The only way the price of oil goes down is either if OPEC wants it to, or if we nationalize it for public consumption.




But that immediately places that company at a disadvantage because that company will not:

1) Have any operations
2) Hold any leases
3) Possess any of the commodity

It would have to be deficit financed, and I just don't see a bank or lender willing to stake that kind of loan on an industry that is completely controlled by a cartel.

Sure put Washington Bureaucrats in charge!!:palm:
 
Independence doesn't have to cost a thing if you're willing to nationalize the industry.

The only way the price of oil goes down is either if OPEC wants it to, or if we nationalize it for public consumption.




But that immediately places that company at a disadvantage because that company will not:

1) Have any operations
2) Hold any leases
3) Possess any of the commodity

It would have to be deficit financed, and I just don't see a bank or lender willing to stake that kind of loan on an industry that is completely controlled by a cartel.

But I'm not.

That's only true on the global.market. the market here will regulate it
 
Nope, because more regulations mean lower profits, capping royalties for example.

You moron.

Regulations have nothing to do with this.

Those oil companies could drill on millions of acres of land tomorrow, they're just choosing not to because drilling more reduces the price per barrel, and the costs to extract the oil are more than what that oil is worth on the global markets if it's extracted.

That's why they aren't doing any new drilling...it's not profitable because the commodity price is controlled by a cartel.
 
But I'm not.

Well then you're in a pickle because we can't achieve energy independence so long as for-profit multinational companies are extracting the oil from under our feet and selling it to whoever is willing to pay what they're asking.


That's only true on the global.market. the market here will regulate it

Again, all oil is bought and sold on the same global market...the only way to get around that is to nationalize the industry.
 
A complete and total lie.

Those companies hold millions of acres of land they could drill on, they're just choosing not to because drilling more means lower oil prices, which means lower oil profits.

It is more than that. They want more leases because they can claim a deduction on the land and avoid taxes. They have 7000 leases they have never touched and do not intend to. They of course control the lease auctions and get them very, very cheaply.
 
Well then you're in a pickle because we can't achieve energy independence so long as for-profit multinational companies are extracting the oil from under our feet and selling it to whoever is willing to pay what they're asking.




Again, all oil is bought and sold on the same global market...the only way to get around that is to nationalize the industry.

I'm kind of in that pickle anyway and I would still prefer it to nationalization. That's just me.

I see your point but I see far more pitfalls with that. I don't want the govt deciding what I get. It doesnt work anywhere
 
It is more than that. They want more leases because they can claim a deduction on the land and avoid taxes. They have 7000 leases they have never touched and do not intend to. They of course control the lease auctions and get them very, very cheaply.

That's a very good point. Well stated.
 
I'm kind of in that pickle anyway and I would still prefer it to nationalization. That's just me.

Fair enough.


I see your point but I see far more pitfalls with that. I don't want the govt deciding what I get. It doesnt work anywhere

It's hard to say what could or would occur because something like that hasn't really been done before in the US; but what we do know is that the current system isn't working because the oil markets are controlled by a foreign cartel.
 
Every single oil company recorded record profits for 2021, so it's not inflation that's causing your gas to be $4/gallon, it's capitalism and greed.

Exclusive: oil companies’ profits soared to $174bn this year as US gas prices rose
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/dec/06/oil-companies-profits-exxon-chevron-shell-exclusive

It's not just oil companies price gouging, mostly all businesses are doing it too?!!

wolv1880-800x534.jpg
 
Fair enough.




It's hard to say what could or would occur because something like that hasn't really been done before in the US; but what we do know is that the current system isn't working because the oil markets are controlled by a foreign cartel.

We may agree it's not working but the solution is another matter. In think ultimately the market is the best regulator of prices as it reflects what's actually happening and not what we want to have happen. Make sense?
 
We may agree it's not working but the solution is another matter. In think ultimately the market is the best regulator of prices as it reflects what's actually happening and not what we want to have happen. Make sense?

Sure. Fair enough. Thanks for the reasonable discussion.
 
But it's not good for the oil companies, which is why they don't open up new drilling on the millions of acres they've already leased.

We keep coming back to the same thing no matter how we look at it; profit is in direct contradiction with energy independence.

To achieve energy independence, what do you need? To extract the amount of oil that aligns with our consumption. But we know that the more oil that is extracted, the less profitable it becomes. So we can never, ever achieve energy independence because of for-profit companies that would lose money if production increased.

but your goal is increasing production.

you want overall less consumption for austerity, the environment and population control and high prices for your crony friends..
 
Back
Top