Issa caught BS'ing on FOX

.... LtCol. Wood's affidavit concerns embassy security while he was in country...
He plainly states he served as the Site Security Team (SST) Commander in Libya from 12 February to 14 August of this year, 2012.....
so he obviously hasn't there when the attacked occured....

I thought it was plain in the heading, "Lieutenant Colonel Andrew Wood Special Forces on security" made it plain about the subject matter of his affidavit...

Does this mean you're really as stupid as TD has been claiming ?....its beginning to look that way to the rest of us....BTW...did you
answer my questions in the other thread yet ?..


Oh...so he wasn't actually there and therefore CAN'T confirm any claim of a "stand down order".

Keep digging that hole, Bunky.
 
Where's the testimony from the Special Forces officer who supposedly got the order.

Where is the testimony from whomever GAVE the order.

Pentagon spokesmen had previously stated that no U.S. assets were ever told to "stand down" the night of the attack in Benghazi. Air Force Maj. Rob Firman told USA Today Tuesday that the military's account of this response "hasn't changed."

"There was never any kind of stand down order to anybody,"
Firman said.

Well, that seems to contradict what you claimed...

Nope...all you've got is unfounded HEARSAY.

Hill staffers investigating the attack believed about 37 personnel were in Benghazi on behalf of the State Department and CIA on Sept. 11. With the deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others, about 33 people were evacuated.

None have been allowed to tell their stories that I know of.... if they did, I didn't hear about it...

Obama administration officials are finally letting the attorney for a Benghazi whistleblower get a security clearance — but the clearance is at such a low level that it will probably slow the congressional probe of how the administration handled last year’s terrorist attack on the embassy in Benghazi.

Don't expect anything soon.....
 
But I remember this little scandal....

http://tinyurl.com/o25zups

Dylan Davies, the disgraced contractor at the center of 60 Minutes' retreat on its story about the terror attack in Benghazi last year, has gone into hiding. That leaves CBS standing alone in the spotlight of continuing critique over the controversial story.




60 Minutes's October 27 report, since withdrawn, centered on Davies' tale of his actions that night: his sneaking into an Al Qaeda-controlled hospital, his striking a terrorist in the head with the butt of his rifle. As The New York Times and The Washington Post reported, Davies told both the FBI and his employer (contracting firm Blue Mountain Security) that he was never able to get to the diplomatic compound on the night of the attack.
That inconsistency prompted CBS to rescind its story and Simon & Schuster, the CBS-owned publisher producing a book by Davies, to take it off the shelves. Shortly before it did so, Davies made it impossible for anyone to question him further about his claims: He vanished. The Daily Beast's Eli Lake reports:
RELATED: The Benghazi Conspiracy Is Too Good a Story Not to Be Told
Davies wrote that on Sunday November 3 at 4:00 am, he was hand-delivered a note to his home address in Wales that said, “Stop talking now or your wife and son will disappear.” In the email to [Simon & Schuster vice president Jennifer] Robinson, he went onto say, “Due to this threat I will not discuss the book with anyone under any circumstances for the foreseeable future, I am not prepared to put my family in danger. I stand by my story however I understand that it continues to be rubbished, which I expected.”




This guy was a British contractor not in the US......
 
Where's the testimony from the Special Forces officer who supposedly got the order.

Where is the testimony from whomever GAVE the order.

Pentagon spokesmen had previously stated that no U.S. assets were ever told to "stand down" the night of the attack in Benghazi. Air Force Maj. Rob Firman told USA Today Tuesday that the military's account of this response "hasn't changed."

"There was never any kind of stand down order to anybody,"
Firman said.

Well, that seems to contradict what you claimed...

Nope...all you've got is unfounded HEARSAY.

Facts don't matter to fools like Nova.....all he needs is a an "official" like Issa ( a fucking crook if there ever was one) to "validate" his prejudices by wasting the taxpayers money pursuing a "suspicion" based on his attempted re-definitions. I swear, it's like Issa took a page out of L. Ron Hubbard's bag of bullshit!
 
Facts don't matter to fools like Nova.....all he needs is a an "official" like Issa ( a fucking crook if there ever was one) to "validate" his prejudices by wasting the taxpayers money pursuing a "suspicion" based on his attempted re-definitions. I swear, it's like Issa took a page out of L. Ron Hubbard's bag of bullshit!

Hill staffers investigating the attack believed about 37 personnel were in Benghazi on behalf of the State Department and CIA on Sept. 11. With the deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others, about 33 people were evacuated.

33 people that were present and not one word of testimony for even one ?....odd...even bizarre.............and suspicious
 
Hill staffers investigating the attack believed about 37 personnel were in Benghazi on behalf of the State Department and CIA on Sept. 11. With the deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others, about 33 people were evacuated.

33 people that were present and not one word of testimony for even one ?....odd...even bizarre.............and suspicious

What's "bizarre" is your consistent hunt to try and validate Issa's folly while DENYING the simple FACT that Issa was PROVEN WRONG when he claimed (or however the hell he categorizes it) that there was a "stand down" order from Clinton's office.


All you're doing is demonstrating your ignorance as to what has recently transpired. Once again, let me TRY to bring you up to speed. From November of last year:


CNN Forgets: Benghazi Survivors Have Testified Before Congress


http://mediamatters.org/research/2013/11/03/cnn-forgets-benghazi-survivors-have-testified-b/196728
 
What's "bizarre" is your consistent hunt to try and validate Issa's folly while DENYING the simple FACT that Issa was PROVEN WRONG when he claimed (or however the hell he categorizes it) that there was a "stand down" order from Clinton's office.


All you're doing is demonstrating your ignorance as to what has recently transpired. Once again, let me TRY to bring you up to speed. From November of last year:


CNN Forgets: Benghazi Survivors Have Testified Before Congress


http://mediamatters.org/research/2013/11/03/cnn-forgets-benghazi-survivors-have-testified-b/196728

and once bravo has his nosed rubbed in his own shit, he disappears rather than apologize.
 
I have been banned from this board. What does that have to do with the point in question?

I don't lie. I may say things that make people upset, but I don't lie.
 
I don't. It's a point of personal honor and integrity with me. I can imagine that concepts such as those are probably pretty foreign to you.... Your loss, I assure you.

Since you lie, this would mean that you also have no integrity or honor; but that was already known.
 
Back
Top