Isreal Learned of the Attack a Year Ago

Bush was in office for less than 9 months on 9/11. Clinton had been President through the first WTC attack and the entire planning of 9/11.

Clinton was in office for one month before the first attack on the WTC, and the beginning of the Waco Siege. Does Clinton get the blame for those? My favorite is Clinton getting the blame for Ruby Ridge, which happened before he was even President.

Clinton handed Bush an open investigation, military plans for dealing with it, and foreign offices to investigate. Bush shut it all down. On September 10th, the day before 9/11, he actually shutdown the Bin Laden Team, as a waste of time. He refused to allow Moussaoui's computer to be investigated. He withdrew the FBI offices from Germany.

My opinion is that Bush did not want 9/11, but he thought he could talk his way out of it. He was good friends with the Bin Laden Family, and assumed that he could bribe Bin Laden out of terrorism. In some ways, he was like Netanyahu, assuming that everything was going to be OK, and would require no effort.

Israel had almost no soldiers in Southern Israel. Netanyahu assumed that Hamas had been cowed into submission, and there was no one else threatening that border. He thought he could bribe Hamas into not being terrorists. It did not end well. Once Hamas broke down the walls, they found no one to oppose them. It shocked even Hamas.
 
How about increased SECURITY at the border?

Mental cases don't know they are liars and stupid. First you lying antisemitic leftists declare that Gaza is a prison and then say why didn't they have more security? Moronic. :palm:

Why was there so little resistance to the attack you fucking idiot?

Mental cases like you should be the LAST morons calling anyone a fucking idiot. Of course, fucking idiots like you don't know they are fucking idiots. :palm:
 
The comparison is very apt dude

Want me to school you on these terror experts who were trashed by Bush and team when they REPEATEDLY tried to inform and alert Bush?

Richard Clarke
John O’Neal

Clarke was "criticized" not attacked mental case.

O-Neal was never attacked. But you can provide a source to your mentally unsound bullshit, I am sure. I'll wait to see it.
 
The comparison is very apt dude

Want me to school you on these terror experts who were trashed by Bush and team when they REPEATEDLY tried to inform and alert Bush?



Richard Clarke


John O’Neal

No, you don't need to school me, evince. I'm familiar with the history. What is your point?
 
Clinton handed Bush an open investigation, military plans for dealing with it, and foreign offices to investigate. Bush shut it all down. On September 10th, the day before 9/11, he actually shutdown the Bin Laden Team, as a waste of time. He refused to allow Moussaoui's computer to be investigated. He withdrew the FBI offices from Germany.

I would like to see your source to this bullshit.

My opinion is that Bush did not want 9/11, but he thought he could talk his way out of it. He was good friends with the Bin Laden Family, and assumed that he could bribe Bin Laden out of terrorism. In some ways, he was like Netanyahu, assuming that everything was going to be OK, and would require no effort.

I would like to see your source to this bullshit.

Israel had almost no soldiers in Southern Israel. Netanyahu assumed that Hamas had been cowed into submission, and there was no one else threatening that border. He thought he could bribe Hamas into not being terrorists. It did not end well. Once Hamas broke down the walls, they found no one to oppose them. It shocked even Hamas.

I would like to see your source to this bullshit.
 
My source is being alive in this country more than forty years and not having my head in the sand..

Thanks for admitting you are just making shit up, stupid millenial. At least Half of the forty was spent in school and being cared for by mommy.
 
Clarke was "criticized" not attacked mental case.

O-Neal was never attacked. But you can provide a source to your mentally unsound bullshit, I am sure. I'll wait to see it.

I think we can all agree that O'Neill was attacked, and killed on 9/11. It would take a true conspiracy theorist to deny that.

O'Neill and Clarke were also attacked and driven out of government before 9/11. They had made enemies by stating that Al Qaeda was a danger before Bush came to office, but the Clinton Administration was able to keep them as a counter weight. Bush had no interest in defending them, so they were gone almost immediately.

O'Neill was also the victim of bad luck. A briefcase with top secret material in it was stolen from him. It was quickly recovered from run-of-the-mill criminals who never even looked at the top secret material, but his enemies made a big deal about it. He was being criminally investigated when he left government. Yes, while the Bush Administration refused to investigate terrorists, they did investigate counter terrorists.

O'Neill's second major piece of bad luck was he took charge of WTC security... And died being attacked on 9/11/2001. Saying he was never attacked is just nonsense.
 
I would like to see your source to this bullshit.

The FBI offices in Germany were shutdown by Bush, and Moussaoui's computer with all its information sat in an evidence locker (unlooked at). Even the Bin Laden Team was disbanded (or more exactly its disbanding was announced) the day before 9/11. We had no defenses, because Bush gave up our defenses.

Bush later actually dismantled the Bin Laden Team. The reason Bush could never capture or kill Bin Laden was because he really never tried.
 
I think the only Americans to blame for 9/11 were the idiots that ran the Pilot Training school.

Here these Arabs only wanted to learn how to take-off, and fly the planes, and didn't want to know how to land them, or let's just say, they dropped out before the landing lessons came up in the training!

Why this was never reported to the authorities is beyond all imagination!
 
I think the only Americans to blame for 9/11 were the idiots that ran the Pilot Training school.

Here these Arabs only wanted to learn how to take-off, and fly the planes, and didn't want to know how to land them, or let's just say, they dropped out before the landing lessons came up in the training!

Why this was never reported to the authorities is beyond all imagination!

The FBI did know.

"
Phoenix FBI agent warned of potential terrorists using US ...

AZ Family
Sep 11, 2023 — Dealing with the ...

FBI Knew Terrorists Were Using Flight Schools

Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/arch...schools/377177b0-b632-429f-9a15-393c2256c2b4/
Sep 23, 2001 — Three days after the attack on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III described reports that several of the ..."



And, there was this incident many years earlier where jihadis planned to crash into the Eiffel tower.


Before September 11th: Air France Flight 8969
Worldpress.org
https://worldpress.org › Europe
Sep 11, 2011 — In 1994 terrorists hijacked a plane headed for Paris, intending to use the plane as a weapon. Although their plan failed, they may have ..."
"
 
Cracka pleez :palm:

The time and place was not specified. You are insane.

Apparently your poor intelligence prevents you from realizing that if the reporting is accurate the government could have but chose not to reposition at least a small existing force to the area in the belief Hamas lacked the ability to stage such an attack. Or else the government anticipated such an attack plausibly happening but felt helpless to do anything about it which does not sound much like Bibi.
 
Projection. Still waiting for your discussion on this topic of how this is a bombshell. So far, nothing but whiny flailing, trolling and deflecting. :palm:

Been asked this question a few times in this sad thread. Apparently it’s a bombshell in Tel Aviv and it was to my friends next door I talked it over with this morning, a Jewish family except for the father who’s agnostic and Scottish. If your dim intelligence sees it as so much ho hum this would not be surprising.
 
Clinton was in office for one month before the first attack on the WTC, and the beginning of the Waco Siege. Does Clinton get the blame for those? My favorite is Clinton getting the blame for Ruby Ridge, which happened before he was even President.

Clinton handed Bush an open investigation, military plans for dealing with it, and foreign offices to investigate. Bush shut it all down. On September 10th, the day before 9/11, he actually shutdown the Bin Laden Team, as a waste of time. He refused to allow Moussaoui's computer to be investigated. He withdrew the FBI offices from Germany.

My opinion is that Bush did not want 9/11, but he thought he could talk his way out of it. He was good friends with the Bin Laden Family, and assumed that he could bribe Bin Laden out of terrorism. In some ways, he was like Netanyahu, assuming that everything was going to be OK, and would require no effort.

Israel had almost no soldiers in Southern Israel. Netanyahu assumed that Hamas had been cowed into submission, and there was no one else threatening that border. He thought he could bribe Hamas into not being terrorists. It did not end well. Once Hamas broke down the walls, they found no one to oppose them. It shocked even Hamas.
Thanks for admitting Clinton had first hand knowledge a month into his first term that Jihadist terrorists wanted to kill Americans and had a fetish about the WTC. He served 8 years. Besides launching a few cruise missiles, what else did he do to stop al-Qaeda other than pass the buck to the new President?

Bush was an idiot, but that doesn't give Clinton a free pass.

No doubt Bibi will take a major political hit for this tragedy. Are you agreeing that, like 9/11, October 7th was more a failure of imagination than it was a conspiracy to get Israel into a final confrontation with Iran and their terrorists?
 
Back
Top