Islam hates us?

Thing1 said:
My "original presentation" was the established psychological principle that people who are marginalized are more susceptible to radicalization. Which you haven't countered with anything, btw.

Again: you are a very stupid person.
Click to expand...

I never tried to counter it and when I used your "original presentation" in a way that caused your sphincter to pucker, you decided to move the goal posts and hoped no one would notice.
So sad.
 
Thing1 said:
You can end it all very quickly: show me the post where I said or implied that marginalization is the only factor in radicalization.
Click to expand...

Since you never included it in your "original post, that's what was being discussed prior to you trying to move the goal posts; which as really pretty sad.

Now show me in your post below, where you said anything about any other factors; seeing as how you want to live in a make believe world, of your own making.
Or don't you think that words have meanings?

Thing1 said:
...the best way to radicalize any person or group is to marginalize them....
Click to expand...
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Since you never included it in your "original post, that's what was being discussed prior to you trying to move the goal posts; which as really pretty sad.

Now show me in your post below, where you said anything about any other factors; seeing as how you want to live in a make believe world, of your own making.
Or don't you think that words have meanings?
Click to expand...

LOL - the "best way." That doesn't imply to your tiny brain that there are "other ways"?

Hahahahahahaha. I love it. Poor stupid USF.

As far as "never including it" - never did I claim that this thread was a history of radicalization and its many factors. How effing stupid.
 
Thing1 said:
Unfortunately, it doesn't.

We can start at the most basic level: the premise that marginalization is connected to radicalization.

Do you dispute that very basic psychological concept, and if you do, why & what is your proof of that?
Click to expand...

I think you'll agree, USF, that I have answered MANY of your questions over the course of this rather painstaking thread.

Why not have a go at my original question to you? Why do you keep dodging it?
 
Thing1 said:
LOL - the "best way." That doesn't imply to your tiny brain that there are "other ways"?

Hahahahahahaha. I love it. Poor stupid USF.

As far as "never including it" - never did I claim that this thread was a history of radicalization and its many factors. How effing stupid.
Click to expand...

I never said a word about "the best way". :p

I love it when liberals begin their nervous laughter; because it's one of the signs that they knew they never had a leg to stand on in the first place and are just hoping to avoid to much embarrassment. :D

The FACT that you've decided to dig in your heels and just try to deny your failures, is even more amusing then all of your attempts to show you MEANT something other then what you said. :chesh:
 
Thing1 said:
I think you'll agree, USF, that I have answered MANY of your questions over the course of this rather painstaking thread.

Why not have a go at my original question to you? Why do you keep dodging it?
Click to expand...

You've answered nothing, except to try and derail you own original comment; but then, you are a liberal after all.
And yet, you continue to try and move the goal posts to something that you're more comfortable with. :palm:
 
USF - you copied my post about the "best way". I assumed it was your "proof" that I didn't allude to other factors?

If not...what was it?

Your schtick is old & juvenile - which is seemingly contradictory, but it is what it is. And yeah - I noticed that you couldn't answer the simple question I posed. Again.
 
Thing1 said:
USF - you copied my post about the "best way". I assumed it was your "proof" that I didn't allude to other factors?

If not...what was it?

Your schtick is old & juvenile - which is seemingly contradictory, but it is what it is. And yeah - I noticed that you couldn't answer the simple question I posed. Again.
Click to expand...

And I was correct that I said nothing about "the best way"; but thanks for admitting that the words were yours and that you originally never said a word about "other factors". :good4u:

Thanks for letting me know that liberals consider facts and the truth as nothing more then an "old & juvenile schtick". :palm:

I noticed that you still can't admit that your own words, you are now attempting to deny.
 
anatta said:
it's hilarious that the left refuses to say "Islamic violent extremists" while the right says "Islam hates us"..in truth it's always been a significant enough part
that waxes and wanes.
good info on Muslim brotherhood, i'll have to look that up.
Click to expand...

The left would actually be amusing on this issue if it weren't such a serious problem. It's like if you refuse to utter certain phrases reality will automatically conform to what you think it ought to be.

But saying Islam is a religion of peace doesn't neccessarily make it so.

The left, and again, much of the national security apparatus, is hell-bent on searching for 'root causes' for Islamic terrorism that will exempt Islam from the equation. Unbelievably, any unbiased observer can figure it out using Google during their lunch break.

Google 'political Islam' and you'll find the Muslim Brotherhood and from there it's pretty obvious the root cause is an ideology.

It even has a name: radical Islam.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top