Is Trump being baited, again?

What is improperly being done in this investigation?

How could it possibly be independent of Government? (Money, Subpoena Power, ect.)

How do we do it in the UK? We set up an inquiry and appoint someone from the judiciary to head it up.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Here to tell you that a million clients are using that privilege every day all day long and it is respected by all the courts and opposing counsel.
The idea that "the privilege is dead" is just more stupid rhetoric from the clown in chief that makes zero sense in logic or fact.
Just because the privilege doesn't work for a criminal doesn't mean it doesn't work for the rest of us.


Not if your lawyer is guilty of fraud...
 
Why does the US have this crazy system where you give somebody millions of dollars, and basically say go get them, and don't come back till you do? How is that much different to the old Soviet show trials?

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
"show me the man and i'll show you the crime"
Congress got rid of Special Prosecutors just for that reason -for some reason DoJ did not.

To add to the craziness Congress critters are trying to pass a bill that says a SC if fired gets judicial review.

As usual Congress dithers, balks, farts out some bogus legislation, and returns to a stupor
 
Alan said "I think the investigation should end and I think the Congress should appoint a special non-partisan commission,” said Dershowitz. He said he thinks a Congressional committee would be too partisan."


I disagree, I think the investigation should continue and be fully exhausted, I will be happy if after a complete investigation Rump is found to be clear. I don't think Mueller is acting in a partisan way, in fact Mueller is a lifelong Republican and Conservative. He is also an American hero as a Viet Nam Vet.

Exactly correct. It's just a narrative with no facts to support it. Trump is being attacked therefore it is partisan. That's the totality of it. Hillary not guilty so partisan.

They can't see that they have a corrupt potus and Hillary was not a criminal. They just don't see that because they watch Fox all day and listen to Rush
or whoever else. If they were intelligent and informed or say lawyers or prosecutors they would understand. Hell, the fact that this is a casino owning real estate
mogul who fucks pornstars whilwe his wife and baby are nursing should tell them something. But they do not share the same reality as we do. They live
on bullshit mountain, homeschool their kids to learn about Jesus riding a dinosaur and hate climate science because oil millionaire told them to.

They are all fucking idiots.
 
We dont have such a system.

We give Mueller millions of dollars and say, fully investigate this, its okay if you find he didn't do anything wrong, as long as you fully investigate. Alan is simply wrong with his allegation about anyone demanding he get Trump. In fact I believe the Republicans who appointed Mueller would prefer Mueller find no crimes.

The Republicans who appointed Ken Starr (a Republican), might have had pressure to find something on Clinton, but it was Clinton's fault that they found it.
how would you like you very own personal investigator up your azz day after day with no probable cause as a basis?

It's a very bad way to fact find -which is what we really want.
also given the scope of investigations what's the chance a SP says "Ok I found nothing?"
They dig and dig until they damnside find something!

* Eureka ! the probe is now justified!*
 
how would you like you very own personal investigator up your azz day after day with no probable cause as a basis?

It's a very bad way to fact find -which is what we really want.
also given the scope of investigations what's the chance a SP says "Ok I found nothing?"
They dig and dig until they damnside find something!

* Eureka ! the probe is now justified!*
Jarod is an ambulance chaser, that ought to tell you how impartial he's likely to be.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
how would you like you very own personal investigator up your azz day after day with no probable cause as a basis?

It's a very bad way to fact find -which is what we really want.
also given the scope of investigations what's the chance a SP says "Ok I found nothing?"
They dig and dig until they damnside find something!

* Eureka ! the probe is now justified!*


Oh come on now.. Trump knows he's dirty.. He's been dirty his whole life.
 
Exactly correct. It's just a narrative with no facts to support it. Trump is being attacked therefore it is partisan. That's the totality of it. Hillary not guilty so partisan.

They can't see that they have a corrupt potus and Hillary was not a criminal. They just don't see that because they watch Fox all day and listen to Rush
or whoever else. If they were intelligent and informed or say lawyers or prosecutors they would understand. Hell, the fact that this is a casino owning real estate
mogul who fucks pornstars whilwe his wife and baby are nursing should tell them something. But they do not share the same reality as we do. They live
on bullshit mountain, homeschool their kids to learn about Jesus riding a dinosaur and hate climate science because oil millionaire told them to.

They are all fucking idiots.

They are incapable of independent thought and draw conclusions without any facts.
 
how would you like you very own personal investigator up your azz day after day with no probable cause as a basis?

It's a very bad way to fact find -which is what we really want.
also given the scope of investigations what's the chance a SP says "Ok I found nothing?"
They dig and dig until they damnside find something!

* Eureka ! the probe is now justified!*

I would not like being investigated like that, and thus don't run for President. A president should expect it and be tough enough/and clean enough to handle it.
 
Gosh, Moon...you must have a Lenovo K8 with Tapetalk.

I'm impressed.

You should have mentioned it before.
It's Tapatalk ffs! It's automatically generated.
I could easily change it to something like 'Frank is a geriatric wanker' but it pisses off the likes of Nomad off and that's a result in my book.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
it's absolute. the exception is if they can convince a judge a crime is imminent ( including destroying doc) and a warrant is the onlly waay to secure evidence. Otherwise it's in force

Bullshit!
The lawyer commited the crime you retard!
There is no privilege
 
Hello Darth Omar,

And you [rjhenn] are a very weak poster lol.

No, I have not seen that. rjhenn is a say-it-like-it-is kind of a poster.

But why are we talking about one another? We should all refrain from such pettiness and focus on furthering the political discussions. Isn't that why we come to 'Just Plain Politics?'
 
it's absolute. the exception is if they can convince a judge a crime is imminent ( including destroying doc) and a warrant is the onlly waay to secure evidence. Otherwise it's in force

Absolutely untrue.

If a client were to call me and say... "I am considering committing XYZ crime, if I can figure out a way to get away with it, will you give me some advice or help?"

IN that scenario, the crime is not imminent and the communication would clearly not be privileged.

Additionally, If you and your cousin Fred come to my office, I represent you but not Fred... What you tell both of us is not privileged because an outside person breaks the privilege.

There are other exceptions, but those are just two.
 
Hello kudzu,

Pence has stated that legal abortion will be repealed in his lifetime.. He wants a Baptist theocracy.

I know. He is welcome to his beliefs. He lost most of he nation with that schtick, and those he didn't lose with that he lost by agreeing to be Trump's VP. He's damaged goods.
 
If my client Daniel Dumff calls me and tells me to pay off the Judge, that conversation is not privileged.
 
Back
Top