Is Special Counsel Mueller’s Office About to Have Its First Conviction Overturned?

Darth Beto Omar said:
Since Mullet’s resources are backed by infinite tax dollars he can wear down a person like Flynn. Flynn was bankrupt before it would have gone to trial.

Just because Flynn pleaded guilty doesn’t mean a jury would have convicted him. Kind of jacked-up, isn’t it.
Click to expand...

He could have used the services of the public defender, like a regular average American would have had to do!
 
noise said:
ROFL.. let me know when special prosecutors go after ordinary people
Click to expand...

Papadopoulos is close to ordinary.

He was just a young dude trying to make a name for himself or build a resume till he got caught up in this business. Thanks to Mullet’s Crime Generator, the young man gets to put ‘convicted felon’ on his resumes now.

All because he ‘lacked candor’ over a boozy encounter in a London bar where absolutely nothing illegal transpired. It’s very easy to get the idea at least some of these people have been set up.

Notice that is the *exact same crime* Mccabe is guilty of. McCabe ‘lacked candor’ [euphemism for lying] in an interview but he doesn’t get indicted.

Why, you ask lol? Because there is no path to Trump through Mccabe. Also, McCabe was a principle actor in the Flynn take-down, so they can’t very well indict McCabe—at least until Sullivan gets done sentencing Flynn.
 
Darth Beto Omar said:
Papadopoulos is close to ordinary.

He was just a young dude trying to make a name for himself or build a resume till he got caught up in this business. Thanks to Mullet’s Crime Generator, the young man gets to put ‘convicted felon’ on his resumes now.

All because he ‘lacked candor’ over a boozy encounter in a London bar where absolutely nothing illegal transpired. It’s very easy to get the idea at least some of these people have been set up.

Notice that is the *exact same crime* Mccabe is guilty of. McCabe ‘lacked candor’ [euphemism for lying] in an interview but he doesn’t get indicted.

Why, you ask lol? Because there is no path to Trump through Mccabe. Also, McCabe was a principle actor in the Flynn take-down, so they can’t very well indict McCabe—at least until Sullivan gets done sentencing Flynn.
Click to expand...

You are for Trump regardless of the evidence.

https://www.brookings.edu/research/...stice-the-case-of-donald-j-trump-2nd-edition/
 
katzgar said:
Looks like the judge wants the prosecutor to charge Flynn with treason
Click to expand...

Omg, they can’t lol.

In order to be guilty of treason: we have to be war with someone, otherwise it’s impossible. Turkey is in NATO for crying out loud. This degree of legal ignorance is barely excusable on a debate board.

For a federal judge to make such a comment in such a politically charged proceeding blows my mind. It’s almost like he was throwing Red Meat to The Resistance.
 
Shut down due to illegal activity:

1. Trump University
2. Trump Foundation

Under criminal investigation:

1. Trump campaign
2. Trump transition
3. Trump inauguration
4. Trump administration
5. Trump Organization
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top