I think a strong and compelling argument could be made for that premise.
Sure. Everyone who owns a wireless device can do so.
I think a strong and compelling argument could be made for that premise.
And you're still not seeing where the government is involved. Awesome.
The UN says internet access is a right, don't they?
I pointed out that the gov't is not shown to be involved in the OP. The fact that I am involved in building fiber optic systems in rural areas is not relevant, per se. Since there is no one claiming that anyone will get them for free. The gov't provides money for large infrastructure construction all the time. In this case the stimulus is doing what it should.
Because you get a paycheck from tax dollars it's OK for government to fund internet systems for private companies?
Because it benefits you personally?
You have low wages?
.Reading really isn't your strong suit, is it?
I defy you to show me where I said anything about my wages, let alone that they are low. Stop trolling.
Can you read at all? What part of the following sentence is unclear? "So the tax dollars have extended the reach of, and access to, utilities, while providing income and training for workers in an area with high unemployment and low wages."
there is no one claiming that anyone will get them for free.
Zuckerberg unveils plan for free Net access for all
http://www.11alive.com/news/article/303475/40/Zuckerberg-unveils-plan-for-free-Net-access-for-all
Yep, this area typically has high unemployment (+/- 11%) and low wages (median household income around $25k). I am not from here. But the workers who are from here are earning better money and learning a valuable skill. I'd guess 25% to 30% of the workers here are new to this industry.
I don't see where he suggested it is a "right".
So you aren't benefited at all?
I am reasonably certain your career benefitted from tax dollars as well.
Based on what evidence?
You are not a complete hermit.