Interesting how the Trump Administration shows little interest

Nomad said:
Show us your proof that ANY investigation of Trump, his campaign or his associates is a "witch hunt".

Show us your proof that, just because we don't know whether or not the investigators have credible evidence of possible misdeeds, that means they do not have such evidence.

Oh wait, you don't have any proof and you don't know what evidence they have or don't have.

So your use of the term "witch hunt" is just more of the usual Trumptard hyperbole.

Got it.
Click to expand...
Adam Schiff says they do know whether or not the investigators have credible evidence of possible misdeeds:

The 11-month-old investigation into whether President Trump or members of his campaign colluded with Russians has still not turned up any evidence that’s strong enough to put before a jury.

That’s according to California Rep. Adam Schiff, the ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee, which is overseeing one of the parallel investigations into whether members of the Trump campaign coordinated with the Kremlin to influence the outcome of the election.

“I’m not prepared to say that there’s proof you could take to a jury,” Schiff told ABC News’ Martha Raddatz on Sunday when asked if he’s seen proof of collusion.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/18/adam-schiff-admits-theres-no-proof-of-trump-russia-collusion-video/
 
GazzaQueen said:
Adam Schiff says they do know whether or not the investigators have credible evidence of possible misdeeds:

The 11-month-old investigation into whether President Trump or members of his campaign colluded with Russians has still not turned up any evidence that’s strong enough to put before a jury.

That’s according to California Rep. Adam Schiff, the ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee, which is overseeing one of the parallel investigations into whether members of the Trump campaign coordinated with the Kremlin to influence the outcome of the election.

“I’m not prepared to say that there’s proof you could take to a jury,” Schiff told ABC News’ Martha Raddatz on Sunday when asked if he’s seen proof of collusion.
Click to expand...

“I’m not prepared to say that there’s proof you could take to a jury,” = wiggle room.

Apparently he's "not prepared to say..." that there isn't either.

Six/one = half dozen/other.
 
archives said:
in Russian interference into America's election process. Sixteen Intelligence agencies have confirmed the fact, the vast majority of everyone in Washington Republican and Democrat believe it is a fact and needs addressing for the future, yet the Trump team has been largely silent on the issue, Sessions even admitted he has never been briefed nor had any meetings about the problem.

The only movement Trump has made regarding questions over the last election was in one of his now infamous photo op executive orders to appoint a commission to study voter fraud, which included nothing to address any future Russian interference.


Why all the apathy over an issue most Americans and their leaders find troublesome?
Click to expand...

I agree, how could the Obama administration let this happen?

and until it happens under trumps watch could we assume it is being taken care of.

just a thought loons
 
archives said:
in Russian interference into America's election process. Sixteen Intelligence agencies have confirmed the fact, the vast majority of everyone in Washington Republican and Democrat believe it is a fact and needs addressing for the future, yet the Trump team has been largely silent on the issue, Sessions even admitted he has never been briefed nor had any meetings about the problem.

The only movement Trump has made regarding questions over the last election was in one of his now infamous photo op executive orders to appoint a commission to study voter fraud, which included nothing to address any future Russian interference.

Why all the apathy over an issue most Americans and their leaders find troublesome?
Click to expand...

like I said I a thread a week ago



they know what happened


its embarrassing to talk to the briefers because they know the briefers know how quilty they are




they don't want to have to sit there
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top