Interesting how the Trump Administration shows little interest

archives said:
So even if that instance was the scenario you would like to believe, that would be one, one example to show the entire media collided with the DNC? For real?
Click to expand...

You asked who was colluding with the media. The answer is the DNC.

There were others who ran their stories by the Clinton Campaign for editorial before printing, but I'm too lazy to look them up right now.
 
Our country and our model political system was successfully attacked by a hostile foreign government.
No one in this Trump administration is concerned, curious or the least bit alarmed about that.
What the fuck does that tell you?
 
GazzaQueen said:
You asked who was colluding with the media. The answer is the DNC.

There were others who ran their stories by the Clinton Campaign for editorial before printing, but I'm too lazy to look them up right now.
Click to expand...

No, after you said it was the DNC, I wanted to know how, and you delivered one example and now supposedly something your too lazy to look up

Fact is the DNC did not collude with the media or vica versa, your just regurgitating demogogue rhetoric based on a few examples framed to "prove" the point
 
archives said:
No, after you said it was the DNC, I wanted to know how, and you delivered one example and now supposedly something your too lazy to look up

Fact is the DNC did not collude with the media or vica versa, your just regurgitating demogogue rhetoric based on a few examples framed to "prove" the point
Click to expand...

We all still remember. It's much too early to revise history.
 
archives said:
Even if true, another topic, does any of that threaten the American political system now or anytime in the future?

Why don't you try to stay on topic
Click to expand...

The media with their anonymous sources/fake news is a bigger threat to our political system than Russia ever was.
 
Darth Omar said:
The media with their anonymous sources/fake news is a bigger threat to our political system than Russia ever was.
Click to expand...

Keep on drinking that Kool Aid, sonny.

That's how the right-wing droolers keep you voting for idiots and greedy assholes who care more about their own profits than they do the general public.
 
Yaya said:
^ hypocrite ^
Click to expand...

How so?

It seems that you're the one who is hypocritical for not addressing the OP, and instead just going for a "they do it too".

Like when you always call out liberals for not being as "outraged" by Christian persecution, but then another poster says that all Muslims should be exterminated, and you don't care one single bit.
 
GazzaQueen said:
I know the POTUS has said he supports the investigation.
Click to expand...

I doubt it.

Responding to news reports that Robert Mueller, the special counsel in the Russia investigation, is now investigating him for possible obstruction of justice, Trump wrote, “They made up a phony collusion with the Russians story, found zero proof, so now they go for obstruction of justice on the phony story. Nice.”

About an hour later, he posted another message: “You are witnessing the single greatest WITCH HUNT in American political history - led by some very bad and conflicted people! #MAGA”

http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-...residential-sideand-then-went-back-to-ranting
 
christiefan915 said:
I doubt it.

Responding to news reports that Robert Mueller, the special counsel in the Russia investigation, is now investigating him for possible obstruction of justice, Trump wrote, “They made up a phony collusion with the Russians story, found zero proof, so now they go for obstruction of justice on the phony story. Nice.”

About an hour later, he posted another message: “You are witnessing the single greatest WITCH HUNT in American political history - led by some very bad and conflicted people! #MAGA”

http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-...residential-sideand-then-went-back-to-ranting
Click to expand...

He said he welcomes learning of any member of his staff's involvement. He also said it is a witch hunt. Both are true.

He also beat the wig off of Hillary. Now we have 3 truths.
 
archives said:
in Russian interference into America's election process. Sixteen Intelligence agencies have confirmed the fact, the vast majority of everyone in Washington Republican and Democrat believe it is a fact and needs addressing for the future, yet the Trump team has been largely silent on the issue, Sessions even admitted he has never been briefed nor had any meetings about the problem.

The only movement Trump has made regarding questions over the last election was in one of his now infamous photo op executive orders to appoint a commission to study voter fraud, which included nothing to address any future Russian interference.

Why all the apathy over an issue most Americans and their leaders find troublesome?
Click to expand...

actually fourteen agencies have confirmed they were told of interference by three agencies, two of which acknowledge they got the information from one agency which has admitted they got the information from Crowdstrike who reportedly got the info from the DNC.......it is true this needs addressing......
 
GazzaQueen said:
He said he welcomes learning of any member of his staff's involvement. He also said it is a witch hunt. Both are true.

He also beat the wig off of Hillary. Now we have 3 truths.
Click to expand...

How much is trump paying you to add a Hillary criticism in all your posts, GQ?
 
Yaya said:
How has he done that?
Click to expand...

:rolleyes:

On Friday, February 24[SUP]th[/SUP], the Trump administration issued a “gaggle” against reporters from the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, CNN, and Politico, prohibiting them from gaining access to the White House press briefing. The ban was quickly followed by a boycott of the press meeting by Time magazine and the Associated Press. To their credit, these two outlets did what White House reporters should have already done – stop attending press conferences dominated by obvious fabrications, distortions, and propaganda.

May 10 - At a time of strain between the White House and the media over coverage of the new administration, reporters raised questions Wednesday as to why a photographer from the Russian media, but not the U.S. press, was apparently allowed into an Oval Office meeting between President Trump and Russian officials.
 
christiefan915 said:
:rolleyes:

On Friday, February 24[SUP]th[/SUP], the Trump administration issued a “gaggle” against reporters from the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, CNN, and Politico, prohibiting them from gaining access to the White House press briefing. The ban was quickly followed by a boycott of the press meeting by Time magazine and the Associated Press. To their credit, these two outlets did what White House reporters should have already done – stop attending press conferences dominated by obvious fabrications, distortions, and propaganda.

May 10 - At a time of strain between the White House and the media over coverage of the new administration, reporters raised questions Wednesday as to why a photographer from the Russian media, but not the U.S. press, was apparently allowed into an Oval Office meeting between President Trump and Russian officials.
Click to expand...

And, if true, did any of this actually stifle speech?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top