BidenPresident
Verified User
no, that was you.
No. You said untestable ideas are valid. I merely gave another example.
no, that was you.
Dr. Robert Hazen, a graduate of MIT, Harvard, and a prominent researcher in the origin of life isn't afraid of saying that many people invoke or speculate that the origin of cellular life was a miracle. Why be afraid to acknowledge it?
His job is then to focus the class' attention on testable hypotheses, like the chemical origins of cellular life from prebiotic material.
Depends on what you call religious! I was warned stay clear of churches?Does that make me religious or not religious?
The nature of existence is matter, space and time exist
They interact
That interaction causes the matter to evolve and change over time
Given Enough time many conditions are created
Some of those conditions created the possibility of things like us forming
Our existence proves that to be very possible
Of course we don’t understand all of the processes yet
Many we now understand we’re once unknown by man and considered by some unknowable by man
That was proven incorrect
We will know at some point if conditions allow us the time
A brain needs engineering,a heart needs engineering,a gall bladder needs engineering,ETC!
Sure, everyone is entitled to an opinion on religion.
I think of God, Brahman, and The Dao as human attempts to anthropomorphize the mystery of the infinite.
There is an enormous amount we don't know about the cosmos and even about mathmatics. Some of the answers we may never know, like the origin of the physical laws, the arbitraty nature of the physical constants, the mathmatically implausible fine tuning of the universe.
My personal opinion is that it is hubris to assume our souped-up chimpanzee brains can, or ever will, know the true nature of everything and of all reality.
Come to think of it, I haven't heard anything about the pseudoscience known as creationism in years, if it's been discredited, that's a good thing.
I'm not an atheist - but I find that to be poor logic for the existence of a creator.
Something like the universe can't come into existence on its own - but an ominiscient, all-powerful being just always existed?
You run into the same issues explaining how a creator came into being as you would w/ the universe coming into being...
Occam's Razor makes it more likely than that the world we see around us just happened randomly.......
Discredited by atheist! Duh
No. You said untestable ideas are valid. I merely gave another example.
I am not partial to anthrocentric words like watchmaker, deity, spirit. Its the same mistake the Medieval Church made, putting humans at the center of all reality.
I am probably one of the few on this board that will eschew absolute certainty and confess to ignorance.
I have no idea if there is some higher organizing principle underlying reality which our simian brains lack the capacity to fathom.
Or whether there is just an inert mathmatical scaffolding our minds can access and which explains everything about the cosmos.
all ideas are valid. some are true, others not, the rest unknown at present.
After creationism was shot down by the courts, ID was evangelical Christianity's next attempt to sneak creationism into science education via the Trojan horse of ID.
God is I AM. Wow!!! Profound!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Who's AM I?
Which is what theists say when asked for proof of God. Like, it's like uh...man, lots of stuff in the world..,mysterious n'stuff!!!
Which is what theists say when asked for proof of God. Like, it's like uh...man, lots of stuff in the world..,mysterious n'stuff!!!
shut up
as opposed to scientists who make up proof of stuff like climate change, mRNA vaccines, big bang and evolution. maybe one day the truth will emerge b2ut its just talk now.