cancel2 2022
Canceled
LOL. You're the dumbass appealing to an alleged authority on the grounds that he was an astronaut, Senator and enginnering proferssor.
Dumbass, really!!
LOL. You're the dumbass appealing to an alleged authority on the grounds that he was an astronaut, Senator and enginnering proferssor.
Dumbass, really!!
LMAO @ 'alleged'
You think a talk show appearance negates his training and education Dung?
What training and education makes him an authority on the impact of increased CO2 on the environment as a whole and human habitation and welfare?
What training and education makes him an authority on the impact of increased CO2 on the environment as a whole and human habitation and welfare?
you are right... how ever could an engineer be expected to be able to crunch numbers.
What training does Rajendra Pachauri have that allows him to head up the IPCC? Do you consider being a railway engineer sufficient qualification?
Pachauri was born in Nainital, India. He was educated at La Martiniere College in Lucknow[SUP][4][/SUP] and at the Indian Railways Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering in Jamalpur, Bihar. He belongs to the Special Class Railway Apprentices, 1958 Batch, an elite scheme which heralded the beginning of mechanical engineering education in India.[SUP][5][/SUP] He began his career with the Indian Railways at the Diesel Locomotive Works in Varanasi. He joined the North Carolina State University in Raleigh, USA, where he obtained an MS in Industrial Engineering in 1972, and a Ph.D. with co-majors in Industrial Engineering and Economics in 1974.[SUP][6][/SUP]
It's not a matter of just crunching numbers, SF. I mean, yes, plants benefit from increased CO2 in a small, closed environment like a greenhouse. The net effects of increased CO2 on a global scale is just a tad different.
Also, too, you should probably look up the fallacy of exclusion.
Ever noitce how you don't answer any questions?
Ever noitce how you don't answer any questions?
ever notice how you always attack the messenger and don't respond to the data in the OP?
That's our Dung, always plays the man not the ball. Speaking to these people is like talking to a religious zealot, they are unshakable in their convictions and no new knowledge will persuade them otherwise.
I am sorry, but what is your background and qualifications again?
LOL. Who really does pay you, though, Aox? I mean, surely you make some money for digging up ridiculous months old op-eds from the WSJ and posting them on message boards, no?
Aox: These guys are really, really smart. One guy went to the moon!
Me: Yeah, he also went on Alex Jones, so . . .
SF: Oh, so going on a show negates his experience and training?
Me: What experience and training does he have on the subject?
SF: He can do math.
Me: Um, it's not really a math problem.
SF: Oh, yeah, what experience and training do you have?
Aox: Good one.
Fin.
LOL. Who really does pay you, though, Aox? I mean, surely you make some money for digging up ridiculous months old op-eds from the WSJ and posting them on message boards, no?
Who pays you?