In a trumpf America, as ruler he jails his opponents-is this what you want??

Jarod said:
Trump can talk about grabbing women in the pussy, on tape, and they don't care...

But they attack HRC for calling a woman who was sleeping with her husband a bimbo 25 years ago.
Click to expand...

Sad...:palm:

It is good to see some ppl in that party w/ self-respect & decency pull their support/vote from the dirty.........
 
evince said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy


The dismissal of U.S. Attorneys controversy was initiated by the unprecedented[1] midterm dismissal of seven United States Attorneys on December 7, 2006, by the George W. Bush administration's Department of Justice. Congressional investigations focused on whether the Department of Justice and the White House were using the U.S. Attorney positions for political advantage. Allegations were that some of the attorneys were targeted for dismissal to impede investigations of Republican politicians or that some were targeted for their failure to initiate investigations that would damage Democratic politicians or hamper Democratic-leaning voters.[2][3] The U.S. attorneys were replaced with interim appointees, under provisions in the 2005 USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization.[4][5][6] [7][8]
A subsequent report by the Justice Department Inspector General in October 2008 found that the process used to fire the first seven attorneys and two others dismissed around the same time was "arbitrary", "fundamentally flawed", and "raised doubts about the integrity of Department prosecution decisions".[9] In July 2010, the Department of Justice prosecutors closed the two-year investigation without filing charges after determining that the firing was inappropriately political, but not criminal, saying "Evidence did not demonstrate that any prosecutable criminal offense was committed with regard to the removal of David Iglesias. The investigative team also determined that the evidence did not warrant expanding the scope of the investigation beyond the removal of Iglesias."[10]
Click to expand...

Except that the Clinton administration "fired all 93 U.S. attorneys" when Janet Reno became attorney general in March 1993
 
Jarod said:
Good luck getting her convicted of anything after the Director of the FBI said it did not rise to the level of a crime.
Click to expand...

First we have to find out why that director gave immunity to her staff that weren't testifying. Why he made his agents sign non-disclosures, and why it appears the FBI maybe have lost/destroyed some of the emails themselves.
 
Irish said:
First we have to find out why that director gave immunity to her staff that weren't testifying. Why he made his agents sign non-disclosures, and why it appears the FBI maybe have lost/destroyed some of the emails themselves.
Click to expand...

Pretty bloody obvious to me why, he wanted to guard against the possibility that Trump would get in hence the need to destroy the evidence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top