In a trumpf America, as ruler he jails his opponents-is this what you want??

Amazing, all these investigations into Benghazi and her email and nothing substantive unless you want to believe the BS of Trump et al. If years of investigation have turned up nothing you must realize that the republican anti Hillary chant is only to keep the base salivating hatred. Some people are only happy and contented when they are putting others down.

"Conservatives thrive on a world filled with mysterious evil and unfathomable hatreds, where good is always on the defensive and time is a precious commodity in the cosmic race against corruption and decline." Corey Robin 'The Reactionary Mind'
 
she has done nothing illegal you fucking liars

Destroying records that are under subpoena isn't illegal ????? Try it yourself, fool ,and see what happens to you


Trumps best line of the night......its what most of America thinks.....
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy


During 2007 the Congressional investigation of the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys it was discovered that administration officials had been using a private Internet domain, called gwb43.com, owned by and hosted on an email server run by the Republican National Committee,[1] for various official communications. The domain name is an abbreviation for "George W. Bush, 43rd" President of the United States. The use of this email domain became public when it was discovered that J. Scott Jennings, the White House's deputy director of political affairs, was using a gwb43.com email address to discuss the firing of the U.S. attorney for Arkansas.[2] Communications by federal employees were also found on georgewbush.com (registered to "Bush-Cheney '04, Inc."[3]) and rnchq.org (registered to "Republican National Committee"[4]). Congressional requests for administration documents while investigating the dismissals of the U.S. attorneys required the Bush administration to reveal that not all internal White House emails were available. Conducting governmental business in this manner is a possible violation of the Presidential Records Act of 1978.[5] Over 5 million emails may have been lost.[6][7] Greg Palast claims to have come up with 500 of the Karl Rove emails, leading to damaging allegations.[8] In 2009, it was announced that as many as 22 million emails may have been lost.[9
 
Amazing, all these investigations into Benghazi and her email and nothing substantive unless you want to believe the BS of Trump et al. If years of investigation have turned up nothing you must realize that the republican anti Hillary chant is only to keep the base salivating hatred. Some people are only happy and contented when they are putting others down.

"Conservatives thrive on a world filled with mysterious evil and unfathomable hatreds, where good is always on the defensive and time is a precious commodity in the cosmic race against corruption and decline." Corey Robin 'The Reactionary Mind'

The fact that Hillary is above the law does not go unnoticed by the American people....

Its proof positive how corrupt Democrats, and this administration, are.....

Its unbelievable that there actually are some morons that still deny reality....
 
Every time I went to countries like China or Russia, I mean, we couldn’t take our computers, we couldn’t take our personal devices, we couldn’t take anything off the plane because they’re so good, they would penetrate them in a minute, less, a nanosecond. So we would take the batteries out, we’d leave them on the plane,” Clinton said in Aug. 28, 2014, remarks.
^ (yet she is shown using her PDA in flightfromItaly to Libya)

The private comment apparently came in a talk she gave to a software storage company, Nexenta, and was included in an email from Tony Carrk, research director at Hillary for America, to other campaign staffers with the message line “HRC paid speeches.”

They would penetrate them in a minute, less, a nanosecond. Hillary Clinton speech, Aug. 28, 2014

Carrk noted that the New York speakers bureau that arranged Clinton’s paid speaking engagements, Harry Walker Agency, had flagged excerpts from various speeches as worthy of campaign attention.

In that speech and in others, Clinton cast herself as knowledgeable about technology, even a paladin of sorts to bring change to the federal government, and hyper aware of global cyber threats.

The excerpts contrast sharply with the portrait of Clinton drawn in documents released by the FBI of its investigation into her use of private email servers while she was secretary of state.

One of those documents quotes Clinton’s senior aide, C
heryl Mills, telling the FBI that on taking the State post in January 2009, “Clinton was not computer savvy and thus was not accustomed to using a computer, so efforts were made to try to figure out a system that would allow Clinton to operate as she did before (the State Department).”
The document said Clinton did not even have a computer in her seventh-floor State Department office.
http://www.kansascity.com/news/poli...67.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy


During 2007 the Congressional investigation of the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys it was discovered that administration officials had been using a private Internet domain, called gwb43.com, owned by and hosted on an email server run by the Republican National Committee,[1] for various official communications. The domain name is an abbreviation for "George W. Bush, 43rd" President of the United States. The use of this email domain became public when it was discovered that J. Scott Jennings, the White House's deputy director of political affairs, was using a gwb43.com email address to discuss the firing of the U.S. attorney for Arkansas.[2] Communications by federal employees were also found on georgewbush.com (registered to "Bush-Cheney '04, Inc."[3]) and rnchq.org (registered to "Republican National Committee"[4]). Congressional requests for administration documents while investigating the dismissals of the U.S. attorneys required the Bush administration to reveal that not all internal White House emails were available. Conducting governmental business in this manner is a possible violation of the Presidential Records Act of 1978.[5] Over 5 million emails may have been lost.[6][7] Greg Palast claims to have come up with 500 of the Karl Rove emails, leading to damaging allegations.[8] In 2009, it was announced that as many as 22 million emails may have been lost.[9

have you called for bush to be imprisoned yes assholes
 
Trump can talk about grabbing women in the pussy, on tape, and they don't care...

But they attack HRC for calling a woman who was sleeping with her husband a bimbo 25 years ago.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy


The dismissal of U.S. Attorneys controversy was initiated by the unprecedented[1] midterm dismissal of seven United States Attorneys on December 7, 2006, by the George W. Bush administration's Department of Justice. Congressional investigations focused on whether the Department of Justice and the White House were using the U.S. Attorney positions for political advantage. Allegations were that some of the attorneys were targeted for dismissal to impede investigations of Republican politicians or that some were targeted for their failure to initiate investigations that would damage Democratic politicians or hamper Democratic-leaning voters.[2][3] The U.S. attorneys were replaced with interim appointees, under provisions in the 2005 USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization.[4][5][6] [7][8]
A subsequent report by the Justice Department Inspector General in October 2008 found that the process used to fire the first seven attorneys and two others dismissed around the same time was "arbitrary", "fundamentally flawed", and "raised doubts about the integrity of Department prosecution decisions".[9] In July 2010, the Department of Justice prosecutors closed the two-year investigation without filing charges after determining that the firing was inappropriately political, but not criminal, saying "Evidence did not demonstrate that any prosecutable criminal offense was committed with regard to the removal of David Iglesias. The investigative team also determined that the evidence did not warrant expanding the scope of the investigation beyond the removal of Iglesias."[10]
 
He said he'd have the DOJ reopen the case.

ANd yes that is what I want if the opponent is openly breaking federal security laws. Which she did.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Office_of_the_Independent_Counsel



United States Office of the Independent Counsel was an independent prosecutor — distinct from the Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice — that provided reports to the Congress under 28 U.S.C.*§*595. The office was terminated in 1999 and replaced by the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Special Counsel.

Contents *[hide]*
1
History
2
Timeline
3
Investigations carried out by Independent Counsel
4
See also
5
Notes and references
6
External links

History[edit]
In 1978, a Democratic Congress was determined to curb the powers of the President and other senior executive branch officials due in part to the Watergate scandal and related events such as the Saturday Night Massacre. They drafted and passed the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, creating a special prosecutor (later changed to Independent Counsel) position, which could be used by Congress or the Attorney General to investigate individuals holding or formerly holding certain high positions in the federal government and in national Presidential election campaign organizations.
The prosecutor, who was appointed by a special panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, could investigate allegations of any misconduct, with an unlimited budget and no deadline, and could be dismissed only by the Attorney General for "good cause" or by the special panel of the court when the independent counsel's task was completed. As the president could not dismiss those investigating the executive branch it was felt that the independence of the office would ensure impartiality of any reports presented to Congress. However, there have been many critics of this law including Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.[1] Many argued the new Independent Counsel's office was a sort of "fourth branch" of government that had virtually unlimited powers and was answerable to no one. However, the constitutionality of the new office was ultimately upheld in the 1988 Supreme Court case Morrison v. Olson.
Previously under the Independent Counsel Reauthorization Act of 1994, United States Attorney General Janet Reno had Donald Smaltz appointed Independent Counsel by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (Division for the Purpose of Appointing Independent Counsels Ethics in Government Act of 1978, As Amended, Division 94-2) on September 9, 1994, to "investigate to the maximum extent authorized by law" whether the US Department of Agriculture Secretary Mike Espy "committed a violation of any federal criminal law . . . relating in any way to the acceptance of gifts by him from organizations or individuals with business pending before the Department of Agriculture." Smaltz was also given jurisdiction to investigate "other allegations or evidence of violations of any federal criminal law by organizations or individuals developed during the course of the investigation of Secretary Espy and connected with or arising out of that investigation."
The most famous Independent Counsel was Kenneth Starr, whose report led to the impeachment of President Bill Clinton. The most recently appointed and now dormant Office of the Independent Counsel was created to investigate the death of Vincent Foster, Whitewater and Monica Lewinsky scandals, among other prosecutions.
The Office of the Independent Counsel is not to be confused with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) which is a permanent independent federal investigative and prosecutorial agency whose basic legislative authority come from three federal statutes, the Civil Service Reform Act, the Whistleblower Protection Act, and the Hatch Act.
It should also not be confused with the "independent counsel" who is appointed by the Attorney General pursuant to United States Department of Justice regulations. 28 Code of Federal Regulations 600.1. There have been three independent counsels of this type regarding the following: the Iran/Contra investigation in 1987 (sec. 601.1); Edwin Meese III and the Wedtech case in 1987 (sec. 602.1); and President and Ms. Clinton in the Madison Guaranty/Whitewater case in 1994 (sec. 603.1). Finally, it should also not be confused with the appointment in 2003 of Patrick Fitzgerald ("United States Department of Justice Office of the Special Counsel") regarding the investigation into the public naming of CIA spy Valerie Plame. This was done pursuant to the general statutory authority of the Attorney General.[2]
 
There was the fact the firewall was pretty much worthless -so much so that they had to operate Clintonmail without it for a period of time.
Mills even warned about it n an Email

Ask yourself how quickly your computer would be hacked without a decent firewall -like 10 seconds?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...curity-features-disabled-Clintons-server.html

*Devastating new emails reveal how Hillary Clinton's 'homebrew' server had a technical problem so serious its security systems were shut off
*The then Secretary of State's closest aide Huma Abedin emailed other high-ranking staff a warning in December 2010
*Don't email hrc [Clinton] anything sensitive. I can explain more in person,' she wrote, newly-discovered documents reveal
*Weeks later a hacker DID attempt to access the secret server
*Clinton campaign deny her server was ever successfully hacked but have never explained what security procedures were in place
*Judicial Watch is suing State Department over the server and found the new documents which show anti-phishing features were disabled
 
He said he'd have the DOJ reopen the case.

ANd yes that is what I want if the opponent is openly breaking federal security laws. Which she did.

Good luck getting her convicted of anything after the Director of the FBI said it did not rise to the level of a crime.
 
Trump can talk about grabbing women in the pussy, on tape, and they don't care...

But they attack HRC for calling a woman who was sleeping with her husband a bimbo 25 years ago.

Nobody wants to reply to this?
 
Trump can talk about grabbing women in the pussy, on tape, and they don't care...

But they attack HRC for calling a woman who was sleeping with her husband a bimbo 25 years ago.

if you were to believe both sides one is off color remarks one is an attempt to destroy people standing in front of her husband. Hence the difference.
 
"Conservatives thrive on a world filled with mysterious evil and unfathomable hatreds, where good is always on the defensive and time is a precious commodity in the cosmic race against corruption and decline." Corey Robin 'The Reactionary Mind'

Very well said:hand::hand::hand:
 
Back
Top